|
-
POSTING RULES

-
Donate yearly (please).
-
Advertise in here!
-
Today's Posts
|
Insert Pics
|

01-17-2007, 07:48 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Bahamas
Posts: 2
|
|
Turbo-Charging A Lycoming/Continental 360 Engine
Any one out there got any information on the specifications of the turbos, wastegate and/or pop off valves etc needed for the 360 cubic inch Lycoming engines. I want to use two turbos not one.
|

01-17-2007, 08:07 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: White Swan Wa.
Posts: 366
|
|
I believe the lycoming o-360-c1a came with a turbo, a parts manual for that should give you some numbers for parts, but that would be for just one.
__________________
Joe Boisselle
2010 RV-4
1941 Luscombe 8C
|

01-17-2007, 09:13 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: El Paso, Texas
Posts: 105
|
|
check this out
From Superior
3. Are Turbocharged versions available?
Superior produces a turbo-normalized (TNIO-360) engine for Lancair. This engine application was developed for the Lancair Legacy FG and is sold only through Lancair. Due to the variations in induction systems, exhaust systems and cowlings of the airplanes offered in the experimental market, each turbo-normalized application can be very different and require different sized components. Superior will work directly with any kit manufacturer that would like to offer a turbo-normalized (TNIO-360) engine application.
See this link
http://www.eaa62.org/progress/show-i....itm&bid=blog1
__________________
______
TGudz
EP, TX
RV7
Wire/Elec Phase
|

01-17-2007, 10:39 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 1,324
|
|
Turbocharged RV8
The cover story on the February 2004 Sport Aviation features a very clean Turbocharged RV8.
John Clark
RV8 N18U
KSBA
|

01-17-2007, 10:45 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pasadena CA
Posts: 2,484
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by cliveure
Any one out there got any information on the specifications of the turbos, wastegate and/or pop off valves etc needed for the 360 cubic inch Lycoming engines. I want to use two turbos not one.
|
Any reason for the twin turbo setup? Seems like a lot of extra work if one would be sufficient. It's EXTREMELY hard to syncronise two turbos to balance boost on a single engine. Mooney did it recently with the Acclaim, but they used single wastegate (or acutator, not sure...). I'd look real hard at doing a single setup. Also look at Tornado Alley Turbo, they make a kit of IO-360's for Cardinal RG's...
__________________
Stephen Samuelian, CFII, A&P IA, CTO
RV4 wing in Jig @ KPOC
RV7 emp built
|

01-18-2007, 08:57 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 5,745
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by cliveure
Any one out there got any information on the specifications of the turbos, wastegate and/or pop off valves etc needed for the 360 cubic inch Lycoming engines. I want to use two turbos not one.
|
If you want to use modern parts and do it at a reasonable price I can help you match the compressors, intercoolers and turbines. Need to know hp, MP and altitude ranges you plan to operate at. The twin turbos package a lot easier in most cases and allow the use of turbos with integral wastegates, again easing plumbing concerns. A big single turbo is a plumbing nightmare on opposed engines generally with long crossover pipes, slip joints, support structures and heavy remote wastegates.
Low mounted turbos will require an oil scavenge pump as well.
There is a lot to it to make it work right. Be sure you need these for your mission before you start and be aware of RV Vne limitations at higher altitudes.
Last edited by rv6ejguy : 01-18-2007 at 09:00 AM.
|

01-18-2007, 11:18 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,283
|
|
Cool idea but not practical? (for a RV)
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by cliveure
Any one out there got any information on the specifications of the turbos, wastegate and/or pop off valves etc needed for the 360 cubic inch Lycoming engines. I want to use two turbos not one.
|
That is nice if Ross to offer to help with info on a custom auto based component design; he knows his stuff and it might save you money over a aviation set up, but it will still add: expense, weight, complexity, maintenance and turbo charging a Lyc not made for turbo charging can have negative effect on the engine.
My main point is WHY? How high do you want to fly or need to fly? If you do you will be sucking O2 thru a tube. As Ross mentions the Vne/Flutter margins get ran into. RV's are a "Sport Plane", "Total Performance" which is very versatile and a good cross country plane but not it's main purpose. Except for X-C the turbo is baggage since it only comes into play above say 8,000-10,000 feet.
With that said it would be cool if Ross or someone was able to fab a system based on auto components. The Superior engine is big money. Don't have a $ but I think you might be shocked. I guess about $20k over base engine or about $50 would be a min.
__________________
George
Raleigh, NC Area
RV-4, RV-7, ATP, CFII, MEI, 737/757/767
2020 Dues Paid
|

01-18-2007, 11:35 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pasadena CA
Posts: 2,484
|
|
I was planning on doing an auto-based setup for awhile, then I thought about it. Can't run 50W oil through most auto turbos, that means new bearings for the turbos or a completely seperate oil system.... I stopped there.
__________________
Stephen Samuelian, CFII, A&P IA, CTO
RV4 wing in Jig @ KPOC
RV7 emp built
|

01-20-2007, 08:44 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Bahamas
Posts: 2
|
|
I'm going to work with Ross on this one and I will keep you updated, however here are some comments gentlemen...... Twin Turbos because the plumbing is WAY less and both fit nicely on either side of the engine tucked under the back of the exhaust on either side, [seen a lot of larger Lycoming engines with twin turbos and they worked just fine], short tubes into the engine air inlet, mounted right on the exhaust manifold [thicker wall tubing] high enough for feed oil to drain back into the pan without any scavenge pump. Using intercoolers, internal wastegates and a preset pop off valve. All I am doing is turbo-normalizing as all my flying is between 10 and 14 thousand feet between the islands [Bahamas], keeps me away from all those Sunday VFR flyers !!!!! and I want to be able to use my Hartzell to its full potential up there.
|

09-13-2009, 07:37 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Vul, VA
Posts: 316
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gmcjetpilot
That is nice if Ross to offer to help with info on a custom auto based component design; he knows his stuff and it might save you money over a aviation set up, but it will still add: expense, weight, complexity, maintenance and turbo charging a Lyc not made for turbo charging can have negative effect on the engine.
My main point is WHY? How high do you want to fly or need to fly? If you do you will be sucking O2 thru a tube. As Ross mentions the Vne/Flutter margins get ran into. RV's are a "Sport Plane", "Total Performance" which is very versatile and a good cross country plane but not it's main purpose. Except for X-C the turbo is baggage since it only comes into play above say 8,000-10,000 feet.
With that said it would be cool if Ross or someone was able to fab a system based on auto components. The Superior engine is big money. Don't have a $ but I think you might be shocked. I guess about $20k over base engine or about $50 would be a min.
|
My answer would be why not? There are as many pros for doing it as cons. My FBO is at 6000', and my main route of flight within 40 minutes takes me over 14,000. My regular flights are to Aspen, Eagle Vail, Leadville, Telluride, and for cheap gas, Los Alamos is 20 minutes away. Although not for everyone, I would LOVE to see a 200-210 HP TN. I have a V-tail with a TN
IO 520, and now can't imagine flying without it.
My .02 .
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:44 PM.
|