VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > RV General Discussion/News
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-13-2007, 10:11 AM
prkaye prkaye is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 2,116
Default blind rivet sizes

When my inspector looked at my emp, he said that it is usually perfectly acceptable to use a blind rivet in places where you have trouble with a hard rivet. He also indicated that, unless you have a whole row of them, badly set rivets are better left-alone (not drilled-out). Does anyone know of a table, or general guidelines to determine equivalencies between blind and hard rivets (i.e. what type of blind to substitute for a given hard rivet).

In my current situation I'm not looking at substituting, but rather at adding extra rivets for reinforcement. For the main wing-spar to ribs, I'm not happy with a few of the AD4-5 rivets on the outboard few ribs. They have had a tendency to cleat, and sometimes the cupped rivet set slips and damages the manufactured heads. If I drill these out, I will probably end-up with elongated holes and a bigger mess. I think a better solution is to add some blind rivets between the hard rivets, in places where I am in doubt. But what type/size?
__________________
Phil
RV9A (SB)
Flying since July 2010!
Ottawa, Canada
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-13-2007, 10:42 AM
Paul Eastham's Avatar
Paul Eastham Paul Eastham is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 506
Default

Hi Phil,
I do not believe any such table exists, because each solid and blind rivet type have different strengths, and spacing varies -- the number of combinations would be huge.

Have you read the riveting mil-spec and the part of the RV manual about riveting? Van's says that "smileys" on the factory head are generally ok. My reading of the mil-spec is that a cleated rivet might be ok if you can't see the underlying hole and the usual head size requirements are met.
http://rvimg.com/MIL-R-47196A_MI.pdf

You are defintely correct that replacing rivets can make things worse, especially when thin layers are involved.

Even if you do have unacceptable rivets, they may be better left alone.
Van's often allows substitution of cheezy LP4-3 blind rivets on some rib flanges -- your flawed solid rivets may be stronger. I recommend that you send a picture to Van's showing them which and how many rivets you don't like -- they may tell you to leave it alone.
__________________
Paul Eastham - Mountain View CA
RV-9A standard build, flying! ~300 hrs
EAA Chapter 338 San Jose
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-13-2007, 10:55 AM
prkaye prkaye is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 2,116
Default cheezy?

Thanks Paul!

Quote:
cheezy LP4-3
Why are they cheezy?

I've decided to invest in a longeron yoke... I've always had waaay better success with squeezed rivets (pneum. squeezer), and I have been dreading doing the ribs to rear spar rivets (near the floor) the old fashioned way. Longeron yoke should make those a snap.
__________________
Phil
RV9A (SB)
Flying since July 2010!
Ottawa, Canada
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:26 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.