VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Education > Flight Testing
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-05-2007, 02:14 PM
dwilson dwilson is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 433
Default How to dress for flight testing????

I am nearing completion of my 9A. I want to know what you all recommend I wear during phase I.

I plan to have Mike Saeger do my first two flights as my piloting skills are not ready for that yet.

So, what do you suggest:

Tennis shoes, shorts and a T-shirt? or
Nomex flight suit and helmet?

Somewhere in between?

Thanks,

Duane
__________________
Duane Wilson

RV9A. Built, flew 1000 hours, Sold

RV10 Built, flying 330 hours so far.

Central Oregon
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-05-2007, 02:45 PM
Thermos's Avatar
Thermos Thermos is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: KASH
Posts: 496
Default

Some might consider it overkill, but I'd definitely vote for nomex if you can swing it. Gloves and a helmet would be nice too. Plus, you'll feel like Chuck Yeager when you taxi out for that first flight.

If you can't buy, borrow or steal nomex, consider wearing something made out of cotton. Synthetics - nylon, etc - have a nasty habit of melting, which is not something you want to happen when they're next to your skin.

I'm sure you're kidding about the t-shirt and shorts but whatever you wear, make sure it covers your arms and legs.

Good luck!

Dave
__________________
Dave Setser
RV-7 airworthy!
Nashua, NH (KASH)
Putting the "slow" in slow-build since 2004!

Last edited by Thermos : 01-05-2007 at 02:48 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-05-2007, 03:08 PM
Brian Denk Brian Denk is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Los Lunas, New Mexico
Posts: 187
Default

Fly nekkid.

No?

OK, then go to the other extreme...Nomex, gloves, helmet if you can find one. I went the full happy meal package including HGU55 (I think) wired for civilian impedence. Yeah, felt really cool and the tinted visor offers incredible field of view. Also wore a chute and still have it. Never saw the inside of it, which is good!

Worrying about your personal safety is not something you want taking up mental bandwidth on the first flight.

At least a full cotton jumpsuit, boots and gloves would be better than that natty polyester leisure suit you might be eyeing in the closet.
__________________
Brian Denk
RV8 N94BD 425 hrs. SOLD.
'57 C-180 Skywagon aka "Shrek"
RV10 90% completed empecone kit FOR SALE $3k.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-05-2007, 03:31 PM
Jim P's Avatar
Jim P Jim P is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 934
Default Ditto on the Nomax

I'd have to enter one for ditto on the Nomax. I have a nomax jacket I use after 250 hours in another homebuilt and I still wear nomax gloves every flight. I had someone tell me once they wore gloves every flight; if you get in an accident, you're going to need your hands and you don't have time to put them on. At a minimum, takeoff and landing. I also have an HGU55 wired up for civilian radios and I love it. In an RV, it gives you a little better chance of surviving direct bird strike on the canopy and the wide field of vision is great. I can't say I feel like 'ol Chuck; he probably wouldnt' get caught dead in a yellow brain bucket but I figure it's easy to see.

So day-to-day flying it's nomax gloves and jacket, with a helmet.

Jim
__________________
Jim Piavis
RV-7 (Flying!)
http://adap.com/rv7
Redmond, WA
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-05-2007, 03:32 PM
rv6ejguy's Avatar
rv6ejguy rv6ejguy is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 5,745
Default

Helmet, Nomex a good idea. The chute won't be much good apparently as you can't get the canopy open (slider) in flight without a quick release of some sort.
__________________

Ross Farnham, Calgary, Alberta
Turbo Subaru EJ22, SDS EFI, Marcotte M-300, IVO, Shorai- RV6A C-GVZX flying from CYBW since 2003- 441.0 hrs. on the Hobbs,
RV10 95% built- Sold 2016
http://www.sdsefi.com/aircraft.html
http://sdsefi.com/cpi2.htm


Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-05-2007, 05:00 PM
fodrv7's Avatar
fodrv7 fodrv7 is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Torquay, Victoria, Australia
Posts: 826
Default Plus

Plus, a fire extinguisher within reach......... and not Powder Chemical.
Powder Chemical will wreck your aircraft with corrosion and the powder will stick to the canopy and the instruments.
Pete.
__________________
Peter James.
Australia Down Under.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-05-2007, 05:20 PM
walter's Avatar
walter walter is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Mansfield TX
Posts: 339
Default

I guess I was bucking the trend when I flew first flight in shorts and t-shirt
and tennis shoes. I was wearing cotton socks though



__________________
Walter Tondu
Flying RV-8A - Fastback, IO-390, G3X Touch, 74 HRT
Prior RV-7A Build Log
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-05-2007, 05:47 PM
gbrasch gbrasch is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Arizona
Posts: 613
Exclamation

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Denk

I went the full happy meal package including HGU55 (I think) wired for civilian impedence.

Hey guys, just be aware of one thing with the HGU55. It is not designed to be as crashworthy as other helmets out there. I learned this when I was a safety officer/pilot of a helicopter aviation unit. The Canadians did a big study on them. The have the nickname of the "bump helmet", all the F-16 guys and the like wear them as they are designed to protect fighter pilots heads when they "bump" off of the inside of the canopies during their high g maneuvers. They do little to protect you in a crash. (But they do look cool). Hope this helps.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-05-2007, 06:11 PM
JimP JimP is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Redmond, WA
Posts: 65
Default Agree

Agree on the crash worthiness with the -55. There's a warning sticker they put on the back of the helmet to that extent as well. That said, I suppose you could end up with with a motorcycle helmet with audio if you wanted to go that far, but I suppose most of the mil-spec flight helmets are a fairly happy mid-ground to give some level of protection. It would be interesting to see what the duster guys wear as well. In a serious crunch, I doubt it's going to do anything aside from keeping stuff together, but it might give you a fighting chance when a seagull runs through the bug food processor up front. This is really one of those things that each pilot needs to decide on. All personal choice, kind of like primer
__________________
Jim Piavis
"Please, make the fiberglass sanding just go away!"
Redmond, WA
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-05-2007, 06:44 PM
jcoloccia jcoloccia is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,110
Default

In addition to all the other wonderful suggestions, I also recommend equipping yourself with a holy hand grenade.

http://www.vansairforce.com/communit...ad.php?t=14057
__________________
John Coloccia
www.ballofshame.com
Former builder, but still lurking 'cause you're a pretty cool bunch...

Last edited by jcoloccia : 01-05-2007 at 06:51 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:44 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.