VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > RV General Discussion/News
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #31  
Old 07-28-2016, 11:17 AM
JonJay's Avatar
JonJay JonJay is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Battleground
Posts: 4,348
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bret View Post
It looks like the G trigger is in the forward direction, thinking about mounting in the spot designated in the plans behind the baggage wall, upside down but still forward arranged forward, and then install a Lexan window on the bottom of the fuse, in case a crash and end up upside down, and the external antenna gets damaged or coax severed, the internal GPS antenna can see the sky and yell for HELP? YES-NO? any other thoughts-ideas?
Careful. That is a structural area.
Last year, a young girl walked out of the woods here in Washington State. Her grandparents didn't make it out of the crash. The ELT didn't do anything. This was a certified Bonanza.
Your thought process is good, but you can not plan for every accident scenario.
I do not know why the ELT didn't work. Could have been a maintenance issue for all I know.
__________________
Smart People do Stupid things all the time. I know, I've seen me do'em.

RV6 - Builder/Flying
Bucker Jungmann
Fiat G.46 -(restoration in progress, if I have enough life left in me)
RV1 - Proud Pilot.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 07-28-2016, 12:18 PM
BobTurner BobTurner is online now
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Livermore, CA
Posts: 6,797
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bret View Post
It looks like the G trigger is in the forward direction, thinking about mounting in the spot designated in the plans behind the baggage wall, upside down but still forward arranged forward, and then install a Lexan window on the bottom of the fuse, in case a crash and end up upside down, and the external antenna gets damaged or coax severed, the internal GPS antenna can see the sky and yell for HELP? YES-NO? any other thoughts-ideas?
The g trigger looks for sudden decelleration in the forward AND vertical directions. Do not mount it upside down.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 07-28-2016, 12:53 PM
bret's Avatar
bret bret is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Gardnerville Nv.
Posts: 2,828
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BobTurner View Post
The g trigger looks for sudden decelleration in the forward AND vertical directions. Do not mount it upside down.
Ok, thanks Bob. Any suggestions for where to mount one of theses so we have an open RF window for the internal GPS antenna?
__________________
7A Slider, EFII Angle 360, CS, SJ.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 07-28-2016, 04:13 PM
BobTurner BobTurner is online now
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Livermore, CA
Posts: 6,797
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bret View Post
Ok, thanks Bob. Any suggestions for where to mount one of theses so we have an open RF window for the internal GPS antenna?
This is a lot harder than you imagine. It's not the GHz gps signal, it's the ELT signal that has an issue. A hole tends to look like a hole to radio waves only if the antenna is very close to the hole, or the hole is a lot larger than a wavelength. At 450 MHz a wavelength is roughly 2 feet. I doubt you're going to cut a 2 foot hole anywhere!
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 07-28-2016, 06:05 PM
rzbill's Avatar
rzbill rzbill is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Asheville, NC
Posts: 2,692
Default

As a one off that is different than all the other 406 units I am aware of, I installed an EBC-406 in the cabin of my 7A. No GPS, no annunciator panel (none required), I can activate it manually if needed and I can pick it up and take it with me if desired (assuming I could walk at that time ).
__________________
Bill Pendergrass
ME/AE '82
RV-7A: Flying since April 15, 2012. 850 hrs
YIO-360-M1B, mags, CS, GRT EX and WS H1s & A/P, Navworx
Unpainted, polished....kinda'... Eyeballin' vinyl really hard.
Yeah. The boss got a Silhouette Cameo 4 Xmas 2019.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 07-28-2016, 11:58 PM
RV7A Flyer's Avatar
RV7A Flyer RV7A Flyer is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: US
Posts: 2,251
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Canadian_JOY View Post
RV7A Flyer wrote:
"So what's the difference between a 406 MHz ELT and a PLB, really? Essentially, only the automation of initiating a signal, right? They're both GPS-based, satellite-detected, and initiate S&R immediately upon receipt of first signal, IIRC."

A couple of points of education here, if I may...

1) neither ELT nor PLB are GPS-based. they can both use GPS position to narrow the search area, but the primary means of location remains the production of a small search area through multiple passes of LEO satellites (soon to be MEO satellites), using Doppler, to locate the transmitter. If that transmitter is sending GPS information then that GPS position is provided to SAR via a geostationary satellite and virtually eliminates the need for multiple LEO satellites, thus giving SAR your position within minutes.
But since my PLB *does* use GPS, and it's unlikely that many would install a 406 ELT without hooking up a GPS if it's possible given their on-board GPS equipment, then in the real world, we're talking GPS location for the most part, with multiple sat passes as a sort of back-up.

Quote:
2) 121.5 ELTs are NOT satellite detected, and haven't been for several years. If your 121.5 ELT goes off, you're reliant on an over-flying aircraft hearing your transmission, then finding the transmitter is done by brute-force searching with airplanes and people. There is no way to take even a rough position hack off your 121.5 transmission - that died when the last 121.5 satellite splashed down in the ocean. Again, 121.5 ELT signals are NOT monitored by COSPAS-SARSAT, period.
I know that. I never said they were monitored or detected by satellite.

Quote:
3) a 121.5 ELT + a PLB does NOT = redundancy. A 406 ELT + a PLB = redundancy. Again, no big brother up in the heavens is looking for your 121.5 signal. A 121.5 ELT signal does NOT initiate SAR unless somebody just happens to hear it. Do you want to take the chance that you're unconscious, bleeding out, with your PLB hanging dormant on your harness? Think about it!
Which is why I said "activate the PLB as part of the emergency checklist".

I'm not averse to 406 ELTs...just their cost. If the price differential hadn't been so high, and the PLB gives me sat-based SAR *and* portability *and* low cost, then I might have installed a 406 instead of a 121.5.

But I didn't.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 07-29-2016, 07:48 AM
bret's Avatar
bret bret is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Gardnerville Nv.
Posts: 2,828
Default

Thanks for all the input gents, the one comment that hit me was (do you have life ins, do you want your family to get paid, they need to find you) that statement hit home for me, Just ordered the Kannad 11-09927 right now untill 8/2015 they have a free battery and retro kit offer, so there ya go.........Cha Ching! man this is getting expensive!......
__________________
7A Slider, EFII Angle 360, CS, SJ.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 07-29-2016, 08:40 AM
moosepileit moosepileit is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Floyds Knobs, IN
Posts: 633
Default

Airlines have to monitor 121.5. I've relayed for distressed GA planes twice. We let ATC know when we here an ELT, sometimes false alarms sound for multiple days, which gets annoying and a bit disconcerting. CAP still sweeps and homes on 121.5, if not also 243. You can see them practicing at Oshkosh, the 4 antenna H pattern on a stick with a sunburned kid on the back of a golf cart, I think they practice on 121.6, based on a time the trainer hid one in our C-17 airshow static where one might want to play hide and seek.

Military monitors 243 in flight, typically. I have homed on activated parachute pingers overflying bases and radioed command post to let the life support shop know one needs to be tuned off. I have heard the new ELTs with GPS feeds, the data goes out on 406 and a synthesized voice on 121.5. I sent the lat lon to FSS, who then asked me about signal strength off some outdated checklist (false alarm at a home, but under a thunderstorm, I had started a 100 mile divert, realized I could not make it to the coords, found out later it was a false alarm). The folks that have to monitor 121.5 are probably wondering if I'm a "Guard Nazi" - I am not, it's sad to me how 121.5 is misuesed, and the 2x I've used it to aid have been filled with other pilots saying, "You're on Guard", causing missed calls to and from the distressed.

This is in only 6000 hours over 20 years of mil heavies and airlines. I'm probably typical.

Not to oversell outdated and not officially monitored ELTs. My issue is a basic fear of antenna function after a crash of any ELT. I believe I have a good chance of triggering the remote pre impact if off airport. The same thoughts on activating a PLB.

A 406/121.5/243 ELT with a dedicated gps feed is the current highest standard. Many good units do not have a 243 option. They still should be fine. Most of us have enough gps sources to feed an ELT's input without needing a 406 ELT with the GPS chip and antennae on the unit itself.
__________________
RV-6, bought from builder.
O-320, slider, carb, mags, FP
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:05 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.