VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics

  #1  
Old 07-03-2016, 10:23 AM
bill v bill v is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: zeeland michigan
Posts: 127
Default sensenich props

anyone have experience with both the metal and adjustable props for an o-360 (solid crank) going on a rv-7. I have a rv-4 o-320 with a wood prop but would like to not have to check the bolts or worry about rain. will the metal have more vibration and pull left on takeoff then a wood prop (what I am familiar with) the extra weight should help weight and balance. The adjustable seems to be the best choice for me except for the word adjustable means moving parts and I worry about having another thing to watch were the solid metal is more bolt it on and forget it. that's were my mind is but would like to hear from someone with experience with both
__________________
built rv-4 started 1987 finished 1996 now building rv-7, fitting cowl
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-03-2016, 03:16 PM
Neal@F14's Avatar
Neal@F14 Neal@F14 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Wichita Falls, TX
Posts: 2,182
Default

I have the Sensenich ground adjustable on an O-320 RV-6. It is "turbine smooth" but in my experience, both it, and my prior wooden prop pull left harder on takeoff and need more right rudder than metal prop RVs that I've flown... not really a big deal, just something you get used to. You also don't really adjust it often... I found my happy pitch setting and pretty much leave it there.

The metal Sensenich prop for the 360 engine has the benefit of no rpm restriction like the metal prop for the 320 does. The extra weight up front does help the CG a bit, and it costs less than the carbon fiber GA prop, and you can use a standard Vans spinner instead of having to buy a special $600 spinner that the GA prop requires. Metal props do vibrate more than wood or composite.

You might also want to look at the Catto props with metal leading edges, and with a 360 engine, you won't be having as much CG issues as those of us with taildragger 6s and 7s do. And you could always use a heavy thick steel crush plate from Sabre on it if you need more weight on the nose.
__________________
Neal Howard
Airplaneless once again...
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:25 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.