VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > RV Firewall Forward Section > Traditional Aircraft Engines
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-26-2016, 01:45 PM
lr172 lr172 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Schaumburg, IL
Posts: 5,281
Default Continuing Problems with Oil Temps

I have an IO-320 6A. The oil cooler is a Mocal 10 row (same as Setrab and heard several reports of success with 7 row version) mounted on the baffle behind #4. Hoses are new; replaced this spring, -6 size.

I had goods success last fall, with temps remaining in the 190 range even in 90* ambient days. This spring I noticed higher temps reaching max's of 220-225 at 75% power levels. I have replaced the cooler, as I thought it may have become blocked with all the carbon I had in the oil during break-in (due to a glazed cylinder). I have two different verhatherms that I have tried (neither new). The one I flew with today was tested last night. I put it in 190* water and observed a growth of .230" I saw Dan's post and his tested at .248" The minimum is .160 or .180. It would seem that the Vernatherm is working properly.

I don't really know where to go next. I can't see in the vernatherm cavity and I have considered removing the oil filter housing (lycoming style with V/T pointing down) and replacing with screen to rule out issues with the bore that the vernatherm seals. I think that I also have a spring and plug laying around to bypass the vernatherm all together. I have also considered buying a new vernatherm.

Does anyone have suggestions or seen similar problems they could share insight from?

Thanks,

Larry
__________________
N64LR - RV-6A / IO-320, Flying as of 8/2015
N11LR - RV-10, Flying as of 12/2019
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-26-2016, 01:56 PM
Toobuilder's Avatar
Toobuilder Toobuilder is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Mojave
Posts: 4,642
Default

I'm sure others will jump in here but the first thing that catches my eye is the #6 hose size. Thats pushing it as far as Im concerned. And if you throw in a couple of 90 degree fittings, it makes it worse. Might explore running the #8 hose, keeping it as short as possible, and 45 or 180 degree fittings wherever you can.
__________________
WARNING! Incorrect design and/or fabrication of aircraft and/or components may result in injury or death. Information presented in this post is based on my own experience - Reader has sole responsibility for determining accuracy or suitability for use.

Michael Robinson
______________
Harmon Rocket II -SDS EFI
RV-8 - SDS CPI
1940 Taylorcraft BL-65
1984 L39C
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-26-2016, 02:09 PM
lr172 lr172 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Schaumburg, IL
Posts: 5,281
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toobuilder View Post
I'm sure others will jump in here but the first thing that catches my eye is the #6 hose size. Thats pushing it as far as Im concerned. And if you throw in a couple of 90 degree fittings, it makes it worse. Might explore running the #8 hose, keeping it as short as possible, and 45 or 180 degree fittings wherever you can.
Thanks Michael. There is one straight fitting, two 45's and one 90. All are hose fittings, so a generous radius. I have read quite a few posts on the the subject of -6 lines and it seems the flow is adequate, but could increase pressure. It was my understanding that many engines, including certified, run these lines. I also had good success with this, even during the high heat of break-in. I realize that 8's are better, but it worked for me last fall

Larry
__________________
N64LR - RV-6A / IO-320, Flying as of 8/2015
N11LR - RV-10, Flying as of 12/2019
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-26-2016, 02:28 PM
Kyle Boatright Kyle Boatright is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,208
Default

Let's see a few under-cowl pictures:

1) Your baffles and seals.
2) The intake area for your cooler.
3) The exit area for your cooler.

On my -6, I originally undersized the hole in the baffles for the baffle mounted cooler. After 6 months (?) of fighting oil temperatures, I opened the hole up as large as I thought practical, which gave immediate benefit.
__________________
Kyle Boatright
Marietta, GA
2001 RV-6 N46KB
2019(?) RV-10
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-26-2016, 03:17 PM
vic syracuse vic syracuse is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Locust Grove, GA
Posts: 2,624
Default

Hoese to/from the cooler really should be -8. You would be really surprised if you looked at the flow rates of the oil pump. In a typical Lycoming the complete oil quantity is sometimes cycled in a minute.
Sure there are a lot of other factors, but choking it down to start with is not helping. What works in certified airplanes is not always transferable in our very-tightly-cowled engines.

Vic
__________________
Vic Syracuse

Built RV-4, RV-6, 2-RV-10's, RV-7A, RV-8, Prescott Pusher, Kitfox Model II, Kitfox Speedster, Kitfox 7 Super Sport, Just Superstol, DAR, A&P/IA, EAA Tech Counselor/Flight Advisor, CFII-ASMEL/ASES
Kitplanes "Unairworthy" monthly feature
EAA Sport Aviation "Checkpoints" column
EAA Homebuilt Council Chair/member EAA BOD
Author "Pre-Buy Guide for Amateur-Built Aircraft"
www.Baselegaviation.com
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-26-2016, 03:23 PM
lr172 lr172 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Schaumburg, IL
Posts: 5,281
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kyle Boatright View Post
Let's see a few under-cowl pictures:

1) Your baffles and seals.
2) The intake area for your cooler.
3) The exit area for your cooler.

On my -6, I originally undersized the hole in the baffles for the baffle mounted cooler. After 6 months (?) of fighting oil temperatures, I opened the hole up as large as I thought practical, which gave immediate benefit.
I'll take a couple of pics. I forgot to mention that I think my baffles are in decent shape. My CHT's run 340 with #2 at 360* at 75% power. I stay under 400 even in hard climbs. My cut-out for my cooler fully matches the size of the cooler and the bottom of the opening sits just above the fins of #4, so not blocked by the cylinder. Area behind the cooler is wide open and not obstructed.

Larry
__________________
N64LR - RV-6A / IO-320, Flying as of 8/2015
N11LR - RV-10, Flying as of 12/2019
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-26-2016, 03:31 PM
lr172 lr172 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Schaumburg, IL
Posts: 5,281
Default

I am trying to install the plunger and spring to force everything to the cooler. That should help me troubleshoot the verntatherm / housing and confirm I am cooling as I should with my cooler and hoses.

I have a plunger, but I am not sure I have the right spring. Does anyone have the relaxed length of the 69436 spring used with this plunger? The one that I have sits proud of the top of the threaded opening by a good 1 1/2" It makes me suspect that is is the correct spring.

Larry
__________________
N64LR - RV-6A / IO-320, Flying as of 8/2015
N11LR - RV-10, Flying as of 12/2019
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-26-2016, 03:38 PM
BobTurner BobTurner is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Livermore, CA
Posts: 6,767
Default

Try easy things first, even if unlikely. Pull your temperature probe, provide a ground, and hold it in boiling water. What does it read?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-26-2016, 03:52 PM
lr172 lr172 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Schaumburg, IL
Posts: 5,281
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BobTurner View Post
Try easy things first, even if unlikely. Pull your temperature probe, provide a ground, and hold it in boiling water. What does it read?
A Good idea. I did that during my initial troubleshooting. It read within a few degrees of a quality thermometer at 200* It also mirrors ambient temps closely on cold startup.
__________________
N64LR - RV-6A / IO-320, Flying as of 8/2015
N11LR - RV-10, Flying as of 12/2019

Last edited by lr172 : 06-26-2016 at 09:26 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-26-2016, 06:50 PM
vic syracuse vic syracuse is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Locust Grove, GA
Posts: 2,624
Default Correction

So I just received an email from a very trusted friend who tells me that they did some testing on the early RV-4's and found they could RAISE the oil temps by using larger lines and that using smaller lines actually made the oil cool better.
I would never have guessed that.

Vic
__________________
Vic Syracuse

Built RV-4, RV-6, 2-RV-10's, RV-7A, RV-8, Prescott Pusher, Kitfox Model II, Kitfox Speedster, Kitfox 7 Super Sport, Just Superstol, DAR, A&P/IA, EAA Tech Counselor/Flight Advisor, CFII-ASMEL/ASES
Kitplanes "Unairworthy" monthly feature
EAA Sport Aviation "Checkpoints" column
EAA Homebuilt Council Chair/member EAA BOD
Author "Pre-Buy Guide for Amateur-Built Aircraft"
www.Baselegaviation.com
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:05 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.