VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics

  #11  
Old 12-03-2017, 03:38 PM
Richard Connell Richard Connell is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 220
Default

Around 3y of flying with single GDU 460 and a 305 here.
In my experience, IFR- particularly the approach phase, using the screen is pretty much a no go if you only have one GDU.
Also the added redundancy of having an autopilot if the GDU goes dark is important.
I?ve had mine go dark once, thankfully VMC.
All depends on your mission. VFR can live without. IFR I wouldn?t.
__________________
Richard
RV7 VH-XRC Sold :-(
RV10 in progress.
Sydney, AUS
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-03-2017, 04:13 PM
Jimd Jimd is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Central Iowa
Posts: 317
Default

Richard are you using the display full screen or split? I always fly split screen with the ElFIS on the left and map or approach plate on the right. I do not have the 305 so I have to tap the AP control on the top of the EFIS to bring up the autopilot window on the right side. I fly IFR with this configuration and I don't find myself wishing for more. The EFIS is always up on the left half and the plate or map is only covered up with the AP control screen for a moment, then put away.

I thought I was going to want the AP control head but the only thing I wish I could do is install a discrete button to activate the right side control screen and then put it away again with the same button.

I think if I had gotten used to the control head I probably would think I couldn't live without it.

Jim
__________________
RV-6
RV-10 tail kit 50%
(When do I get to measure something?)

"Flying north of the Arctic Circle and back - several thousand dollars,

Doing it in an RV you built yourself - PRICELESS!"
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-03-2017, 05:29 PM
Richard Connell Richard Connell is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 220
Default

Hi Jim.
Yes this is pretty much how I am set up as well.
For me the issue is more one of unwanted PFD changes in the approach phase.

In my view having any PDF configuration changes while flying an approach in IMC is not risk free.
My approach checklist bans all touching of the screen past the IAF.

Also, It?s pretty easy to have more than one go at something on the touch screen if it?s bumpy. The touch screen requires 3 discrete touches to achieve the same as one touch on the GMC.

I agree you?d be pleasantly surprised at how easy a GMC would make your life :-)
__________________
Richard
RV7 VH-XRC Sold :-(
RV10 in progress.
Sydney, AUS
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-03-2017, 09:42 PM
ColoRv's Avatar
ColoRv ColoRv is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Tampa (BKV)
Posts: 926
Default

I just upgraded from non touch dual screen to single touch large screen. No GMC room on my panel so I go without. I've been playing with it IFR, coupled and have no complaints. It can't definitely be left out and considering how huge the GMC is (really Garmin?) I suspect some will leave it out. I am content without it.
__________________
RV-8 Flying
1,235th flying RV8
SARL Race#95
SnF Homebuilt Judge

2015 Sun n Fun Kit Built Reserve Grand Champion
2015 Oshkosh Kit Built Champion
2015 Jeffco Kit Built Grand Champion
2014 Oshkosh Outstanding Workmanship Award

Broken Warrior of the Jarhead Clan
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:38 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.