VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics

  #11  
Old 05-02-2016, 12:24 PM
bkthomps bkthomps is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Destin
Posts: 1,543
Default

My price is $23/btl after verifying receipts- that's still considerably less than 28+tax
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-02-2016, 01:52 PM
David-aviator David-aviator is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chesterfield, Missouri
Posts: 4,514
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RV8JD View Post
I'm confused. I thought the smallest bottle Aviation Camguard came in was 16 ounces (Pint). Is that not correct, or did you get a non-aviation version of Camguard?
Sorry for confusion. I bought aviation stuff, 16 ounces.
A search turned up the 8 oz bottle from a "pilot shop" but it is the auto version.
__________________
RV-12 Build Helper
RV-7A...Sold #70374
The RV-8...Sold #83261
I'm in, dues paid 2019 This place is worth it!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-02-2016, 02:40 PM
swordtail swordtail is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Grindstone, PA
Posts: 145
Default

I use it in my boat, motorcycle, truck, tractor, mower and airplane (RV6A). Different versions of the same product. IMHO this is insurance and it has a cost. I got A 3 mpg increase in my Yukon using it. I don't mind spending a little money to save a lot of money.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-03-2016, 09:04 AM
6 Gun 6 Gun is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 846
Default product

Whats the different names of other than Cam Guard?
Bob
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-03-2016, 10:35 AM
swordtail swordtail is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Grindstone, PA
Posts: 145
Default

Cam Guard, Marine, Auto, Aviation. I use the marine in the tractor and Auto for the motorcycle.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-03-2016, 12:00 PM
NYTOM NYTOM is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Raleigh, North Carolina
Posts: 1,128
Default Hoping its a good investment

I read a very interesting article a few years back on Avweb, Flying or maybe AOPA or at least some aviation related area. They did a In depth comparison of oil additives and rated them. Can't remember the contents at all but do remember that Camgard was the best hands down. Even wrote the word "Camguard" in the inside lid of my toolbox so I wouldn't forget. Good to see people here are getting good results.
__________________
Tom Norwood
Classic "Short Tail 6A N822PM
TMX-O360. Phase 1
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-03-2016, 02:04 PM
moosepileit moosepileit is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Floyds Knobs, IN
Posts: 638
Default

My take from the salt cabinet tests was that multiviscosity is fine if you fly every week, straight weight if flying every two weeks and Camguard if you may be down up to three weeks.

Past that, you, "should" preserve the engine.

I often have 2 week flying breaks, I use Camguard.

It's the equivalent, to me of paying an extra $3.25/qt for the best oil I can get. I would pay 50% more for the best quart of oil, so I do. I only fly 75-100 hours/year, so I value time of overhaul case splits over pure flying hours between major work.

Hoping it's a bit of, "time, in a bottle".
__________________
RV-6, bought from builder.
O-320, slider, carb, mags, FP
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-03-2016, 02:22 PM
tim2542 tim2542 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Redding,Ca
Posts: 633
Default ECI

ECI claimed my early (300hr) valve guide failure was the result of my using CamGaurd.
I don't believe it, but that's what they told me.
FWIW
Tim Andres
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-03-2016, 02:45 PM
StuBob StuBob is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 254
Default

If you search the Aviation Consumer site for stories about oil and about Camguard, you could lose about three days reading it all. Then see what Ed Kollin, former Exxon Elite project manager and developer of Camguard has written over on BeechTalk, which will cost you another day. Here's the Executive Summary:

1. There's no advantage to semi-synthetic oils over straight dinosaur, and there's probably a disadvantage.
2. The additive packages in AeroShell 15W-50, W100+, and Exxon Elite are similar to that in CamGuard, but in inadequate quantities. There is no reason to use these more expensive oils.
3. There is no disadvantage to multi-viscosity oils.
4. AvBlend might reduce corrosion.
5. CamGuard probably reduces corrosion.

Based on this, I've come down to Phillips X/C 20W-50 and CamGuard.
__________________
Stu F.
RV8
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 05-03-2016, 04:08 PM
AndyRV7's Avatar
AndyRV7 AndyRV7 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hudson County, NJ
Posts: 1,092
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by StuBob View Post
Based on this, I've come down to Phillips X/C 20W-50 and CamGuard.
That's what I use too. Not sure if it is doing anything. But the times I am weathered for a few weekends in a row, I feel better.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:20 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.