VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > RV General Discussion/News
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-22-2006, 10:20 AM
ptrotter ptrotter is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sussex, NJ
Posts: 309
Default Altitude Encoders

I'm putting in GRT's Horizon I EFIS that has an altitude encoder output. Is there any reason to install a seperate altitude encoder? Has anyone had any issues with their transponder check if they don't have a TSO's encoder? Do the regs say anything about a TSO's encoder for IFR operation? An encoder is fairly cheap but it takes up space and just adds one more thing. If I do put one in, what is the opnion on the best choice? There is an obvious advantage to using the output from the GRT as your transponder would agree with your instruments.
__________________
Paul Trotter
Sussex, NJ
RV-8 82080 Finish/FWF Kit
N801PT
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-22-2006, 10:53 AM
brian's Avatar
brian brian is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Cornish, NH
Posts: 391
Default

I went through a huge saga on this. I have both BMA and GRT EFIS systems. Both produce encoder output. My local avionics guy, who has a stellar reputation, but little experimental experience, said he would not wire up the avionics for me unless I bought a TSO encoder. Going ot another shop was not really an option for me.

We went around and around on it for months, also getting opinions on it from EAA and local FSDO. EAA said OK, FSDO said no. I also started what was quite a long thread about it on the BMA discussion group. In the end, I gave up arguing about it and bought a Sandia encoder, although it irked me to do so.

I understand there are lots of people out there flying IFR using the encoder from their experimental GRT or BMA EFIS. So, it really comes down to what you are comfortable with, and what your avionics installer/tester is comfortable with.

Details starting at http://brian76.mystarband.net/avionicsAug04.htm#aug31

good luck with it - it's a very confusing and ambiguous situation
brian
__________________
Brian Meyette, Cornish, NH
1995 RV-6A - N16RK (Ralph Koger) SOLD
RV-7A - incomplete, supercharged Subaru STi - N432MM - SOLD
2001 Quad City Challenger II LW - N28RT SOLD

www.meyette.us/RV-7Ahome.htm
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-22-2006, 11:46 AM
Ironflight's Avatar
Ironflight Ironflight is offline
VAF Moderator / Line Boy
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dayton, NV
Posts: 12,247
Default

I feel for you Brian - I have myself experienced the frustration that comes from the differing opinions between FSDO's around the country (back when I owned certified airplanes). It kind of puts a lie to the whole "Federal Agency" thing when you get directly opposite opinions from two different offices, and BOTH of them are allowed to take enforcement action against you....

That said - I had no problem whatsoever getting my system IFR checked by a local avionics tech using the GRT encoder. I know.....it's not fair!

Paul
__________________
Paul F. Dye
Editor at Large - KITPLANES Magazine
RV-8 - N188PD - "Valkyrie"
RV-6 (By Marriage) - N164MS - "Mikey"
RV-3B - N13PL - "Tsamsiyu"
A&P, EAA Tech Counselor/Flight Advisor
Dayton Valley Airpark (A34)
http://Ironflight.com
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-22-2006, 11:51 AM
Martin Sutter Martin Sutter is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 266
Default

Just had my GRT system IFR certified and encountered absolutely no problems. The encoder output was dead on and the altimeter only 20' off, easily adjusted in the set-up pages.

Martin Sutter
RV6 868CM, RV7A 678CM
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-22-2006, 12:03 PM
AZtailwind's Avatar
AZtailwind AZtailwind is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Flagstaff, AZ
Posts: 447
Default Transponder type?

Some of this answer will depend on your transponder- I know the Dynon system I am planning on will require a serial to gray code converter. My older King transponder is gray codec for Mode-C reporting.... Another box. So I was thinking of just buying an encoder for my Mode-C and using the serial output of the Dynon for the GPS IFR required encoding. This would make half of a TSO'd system "legal". Kind of like a FAA/government setup- One half wouldn't know what the other is doing

Brad
RV6A
panel-Finishing
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:27 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.