|
-
POSTING RULES

-
Donate yearly (please).
-
Advertise in here!
-
Today's Posts
|
Insert Pics
|

12-14-2015, 08:27 AM
|
 |
Senior Curmudgeon
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Dayton Airpark, NV A34
Posts: 15,408
|
|
Welcome to VAF!
Quote:
Originally Posted by N710B
Hi all,
I'm new to the group and just purchased an RV-6
Dave
|
Dave, welcome aboard the good ship VAF
Congrats on the new 6.
__________________
Mike Starkey
VAF 909
Rv-10, N210LM.
Flying as of 12/4/2010
Phase 1 done, 2/4/2011 
Sold after 240+ wonderful hours of flight.
"Flying the airplane is more important than radioing your plight to a person on the ground incapable of understanding or doing anything about it."
|

12-14-2015, 08:34 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dallas area
Posts: 10,762
|
|
Like Sam says, the -E2D has a hollow crank but won't allow for C/S because of the front bearing configuration. High compression pistons are the simplest way to increase hp.
__________________
Mel Asberry, DAR since the last century.
EAA Flight Advisor/Tech Counselor, Friend of the RV-1
Recipient of Tony Bingelis Award and Wright Brothers Master Pilot Award
USAF Vet, High School E-LSA Project Mentor.
RV-6 Flying since 1993 (sold)
<rvmel(at)icloud.com>
|

12-14-2015, 10:44 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ga
Posts: 662
|
|
Agree
All things considered, I agree with Mel and Sam. I had a 150hp and changed the Pistons to 9:1 along with heavy wall pins. It really brought the engine to life and turned a good cruise prop into an great all around climber.
No changes to structure and didn't have to change carb either.
Cj
|

12-14-2015, 12:26 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Royse City, TX
Posts: 143
|
|
Concur
The potential 20-30 hp performance gain may be marginalized by the high cost of swapping out a perfectly good O-320, the minimal performance gain, the added 25 lbs fwd of the firewall, increased fuel usage, time spent re-engineering the swap and time spent in Phase 1.
Keep it light and simple.
Possibly put a Catto prop on your current configuration, it may provide additional performance for minimal effort and cost.
|

12-14-2015, 02:46 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,670
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam Buchanan
My E2D has a hollow crank but the case isn't machined for a governor..................
|
Sam, if you have a hollow crank, wouldn't that change the engine designation? I thought that by definition, an -E2D has a solid crank... 
__________________
Pete Hunt, [San Diego] VAF #1069
RV-6, RV-6A, T-6G
ATP, CFII, A&P
2020 Donation+, Gladly Sent
|

12-14-2015, 02:54 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dallas area
Posts: 10,762
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PCHunt
Sam, if you have a hollow crank, wouldn't that change the engine designation? I thought that by definition, an -E2D has a solid crank... 
|
Where did you see this? I've never seen an -E2D with a solid crank.
__________________
Mel Asberry, DAR since the last century.
EAA Flight Advisor/Tech Counselor, Friend of the RV-1
Recipient of Tony Bingelis Award and Wright Brothers Master Pilot Award
USAF Vet, High School E-LSA Project Mentor.
RV-6 Flying since 1993 (sold)
<rvmel(at)icloud.com>
|

12-14-2015, 06:11 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,670
|
|
Hi Mel, I bought an RV-6A with an O-320-E2D installed, and was told it had a solid crank. I have been trying to find something online that would state which crank it has, unsuccessful so far.
I do see that it has an O-235 front bearing on that crank, and I assumed that meant solid crank?
Waiting to be properly educated!! 
__________________
Pete Hunt, [San Diego] VAF #1069
RV-6, RV-6A, T-6G
ATP, CFII, A&P
2020 Donation+, Gladly Sent
|

12-14-2015, 06:29 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Omaha, NE (KMLE)
Posts: 2,246
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PCHunt
Hi Mel, I bought an RV-6A with an O-320-E2D installed, and was told it had a solid crank. I have been trying to find something online that would state which crank it has, unsuccessful so far.
|
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lycoming_O-320
Might not be perfect, but might help.
__________________
Dale
Omaha, NE
RV-12 # 222 N980KM "Screamin' Canary" (bought flying)
Fisher Celebrity (under construction)
Previous RV-7 project (sold)
|

12-15-2015, 11:01 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ashland, OR
Posts: 2,561
|
|
The other issue with 360 conversion
Along with what others have mentioned here,
The motor mount is different for the 360....it is a bit shorter, to keep the c.g. in the right place.
Whether that moves the crank flange back, I don't know for sure. But I suspect the cowl would have to be changed (either because of this, or because of the width increase and carb location, as mentioned by others).
So, engine mount, baffles, cowl....its pretty much a complete re-do of the FWF.
On the flip side, if that O-320 is not making metal, and has good compression and not burning too much oil, just keep running it. I'm not convinced they ever truly "time out". I've owned a Citabria with a 320 that we decided we should overhaul after 3200 hrs. It was pretty much like new inside.
On the other side though, I've known of an O-320 that went downhill very fast at 1400 hrs with dramatic loss of power, high oil consumption and metal in the oil screen.
The difference was it was left to sit unused for a prolonged period and then returned to hard service. I think it was a camshaft rust problem.
And when it does come time to overhaul, some of the options suggested here will get you a nice boost in power.
__________________
Steve Smith
Aeronautical Engineer
RV-8 N825RV
IO-360 A1A
WW 200RV
"The Magic Carpet"
Hobbs 625
LS6-15/18W sailplane SOLD
bought my old LS6-A back!! 
VAF donation Jan 2020
|

12-15-2015, 12:01 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: 57AZ - NW Tucson area
Posts: 10,011
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by scsmith
Along with what others have mentioned here,
The motor mount is different for the 360....it is a bit shorter, to keep the c.g. in the right place.
Whether that moves the crank flange back, I don't know for sure. But I suspect the cowl would have to be changed (either because of this, or because of the width increase and carb location, as mentioned by others).
So, engine mount, baffles, cowl....its pretty much a complete re-do of the FWF.
.....
|
I think your motor mount comment is for the RV-7 series only.
The RV-6 motor mounts are the same for O-320 and O-360 engines. I changed in mid-build with no mount problems.
There are two cowl lengths though depending on the length of the prop spacer, and the depth of the "carb scoop" between the two models changes, but a replacement scoop is available that can be spliced onto the existing cowl.
__________________
Gil Alexander
EAA Technical Counselor, Airframe Mechanic
Half completed RV-10 QB purchased
RV-6A N61GX - finally flying
Grumman Tiger N12GA - flying
La Cholla Airpark (57AZ) Tucson AZ
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:42 PM.
|