|
-
POSTING RULES

-
Donate yearly (please).
-
Advertise in here!
-
Today's Posts
|
Insert Pics
|

11-09-2015, 04:43 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Clinton, Indiana
Posts: 992
|
|
Engine smoothness question ?
RV-3 with 0320parrallel mount w/carb,dual Pmag and Catto 2 blade 😞
Would a dynamical 3 blade be worth the effort to upgrade ?????
__________________
Larry DeCamp
RV-3B flying w/7:1 0320 / carb / Pmags / Catto 3b / digital steam
RV-4 fastback w/ Superior roller 360/AFP/G3X/CPI/Catto3b
Clinton, IN
|

11-09-2015, 04:45 PM
|
|
Super Moderator
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Locust Grove, GA
Posts: 2,624
|
|
Oh yes!
I just balanced my MT 3 blade down to .02 IPS.
Vic
__________________
 Vic Syracuse
Built RV-4, RV-6, 2-RV-10's, RV-7A, RV-8, Prescott Pusher, Kitfox Model II, Kitfox Speedster, Kitfox 7 Super Sport, Just Superstol, DAR, A&P/IA, EAA Tech Counselor/Flight Advisor, CFII-ASMEL/ASES
Kitplanes "Unairworthy" monthly feature
EAA Sport Aviation "Checkpoints" column
EAA Homebuilt Council Chair/member EAA BOD
Author "Pre-Buy Guide for Amateur-Built Aircraft"
www.Baselegaviation.com
|

11-09-2015, 05:04 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
Posts: 908
|
|
I think he?s asking if it would be worth upgrading from 2 blade to 3 blade. I don?t know what a ?dynamical 3 blade? is.
2 blades or 3, they both work well, if you like your 2 blade I would keep it, if you want a 3 blade get a 3 blade.
|

11-09-2015, 05:14 PM
|
|
Super Moderator
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Locust Grove, GA
Posts: 2,624
|
|
Sorry
Missed that. But yes, my experience has been that the 3 blades can be a little smoother. Not to start a war. I said CAN be.

__________________
 Vic Syracuse
Built RV-4, RV-6, 2-RV-10's, RV-7A, RV-8, Prescott Pusher, Kitfox Model II, Kitfox Speedster, Kitfox 7 Super Sport, Just Superstol, DAR, A&P/IA, EAA Tech Counselor/Flight Advisor, CFII-ASMEL/ASES
Kitplanes "Unairworthy" monthly feature
EAA Sport Aviation "Checkpoints" column
EAA Homebuilt Council Chair/member EAA BOD
Author "Pre-Buy Guide for Amateur-Built Aircraft"
www.Baselegaviation.com
|

11-09-2015, 05:19 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Clinton, Indiana
Posts: 992
|
|
Mount significance ?
OK, Craig says a 3 blade might be smoother, and of course, balancing can only be worth 0 to plus X? My real unknown is the value of dynafocal. That would require a new mount, new engine and probably a cowl.
__________________
Larry DeCamp
RV-3B flying w/7:1 0320 / carb / Pmags / Catto 3b / digital steam
RV-4 fastback w/ Superior roller 360/AFP/G3X/CPI/Catto3b
Clinton, IN
|

11-09-2015, 06:35 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Warwickshire UK
Posts: 703
|
|
There is a conical mount upgrade that works better than the standard Lycoming part.
It is Lord mount part J1552. About 5 times the price, but they do make a difference.
|

11-09-2015, 06:48 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Wichita Falls, TX
Posts: 2,182
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Russ McCutcheon
I don?t know what a ?dynamical 3 blade? is
|
Must be something like a "jellicle" cat 
Yeah I know that a 3 blade prop is smoother and lots more sexy looking than a 2 blade, but a 2 blade is slightly more efficient than a 3 blade and a whole lot cheaper to buy.
__________________
Neal Howard
Airplaneless once again...
|

11-09-2015, 08:25 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 4,428
|
|
A dynamic prop balance is a lot cheaper than a new prop and has, on mine, made a big difference and that's with a 2-bladed prop. Of course if the dynamic balance wasn't enough and then you got that new prop afterwards, that would be money wasted, I think.
How is the mixture? Any smoothing when you lean or enrichen it?
Dave
|

11-10-2015, 08:58 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 4,428
|
|
Larry, the only other thing I wondered about, given the snug RV-3 cowl, is whether the engine is bumping into something.
Dave
|

11-10-2015, 10:17 AM
|
 |
VAF Moderator / Line Boy
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dayton, NV
Posts: 12,247
|
|
Ownign both two and three-blade props, I know that they can both be made as smooth as silk with a good dynamic balance. You have several unknowns that, unless you throw money at them, you really don't know how they affect the overall result. Going Dynafocal should help, but it would be a big deal to change. A new prop? Always fun, but unless you have other reasons to change the prop, I think I'd go for a dynamic balance first, and see if that helps.
__________________
Paul F. Dye
Editor at Large - KITPLANES Magazine
RV-8 - N188PD - "Valkyrie"
RV-6 (By Marriage) - N164MS - "Mikey"
RV-3B - N13PL - "Tsamsiyu"
A&P, EAA Tech Counselor/Flight Advisor
Dayton Valley Airpark (A34)
http://Ironflight.com
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:06 AM.
|