|
-
POSTING RULES

-
Donate yearly (please).
-
Advertise in here!
-
Today's Posts
|
Insert Pics
|

10-29-2015, 09:06 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: brazil
Posts: 316
|
|
Ask guys at Boeing 787! fire, fire, heat. dangerous, it is not worth
__________________
Guilherme Plassmann (Brazil)
RV7A (Mr Flame) slow kit S/N 74285 Finished 04/14/15😀😀😀😀flying
G3X
Superior IO360
Sterba prop
TSFlightlines hoses
LR30,PRM1,C560,C510S,HS125,B350 FAA/ANAC Pilot

Donation made 2016
|

10-29-2015, 10:16 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 804
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Canadian_JOY
I was going to use an Odyssey PC680 in our project plane, and I even bought a pair of them for this very purpose. Then the battery in my wife's Miata failed, so one of the 680's was called into service. Uh oh, now the lawn tractor won't start. Dang, there goes the second 680.
Now that I have no 680's in stock, I'm giving consideration to going the EarthX route.
What I'd like to know is how large is the install base and what is the fleet flight hour accumulation on these LiFePo batteries. In short, I'd like to get a sense of overall reliability. A second important consideration for me is, being a Canuck, I have to have a battery that will make things go when it's cold. I mean cold, as in -20C (my personal cutoff for flying).
|
Call EarthX and ask for Kathy. She will give you answers or go and get answers for you.
__________________
James E. Clark
Columbia, SC
RV6 Flying, RV6A Cowling
APRS
|

10-29-2015, 10:35 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Dunwoody GA (KLZU)
Posts: 59
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guilhermepilot
Ask guys at Boeing 787! fire, fire, heat. dangerous, it is not worth
|
The 787 uses a LiCoO2 battery the only technology available at the time, the newer LiFePO4 are much safer and what is in use today. They're used in electric cars as well as laptops etc. For me the weight savings plus other advantages are hard to ignore.
__________________
John
9A - 92129 / N1354J First Flight 5/2/2015
Dues paid
|

10-29-2015, 10:48 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,967
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Evolution10
Bought the EarthX, never worked from the start (read would not turn engine at all). I even bought the Optima4 charger for it. For now I traded back to Concorde. I will call EarthX up soon.
|
Could have a bad cell, which would indicate proper Volts, but might hamper cranking ability. Call them up, I'm sure they can help diagnose the problem. If it was bad from the start they'd probably replace it.
|

10-29-2015, 02:54 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 1,565
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BruceMe
Great, I have a lot of good experience with LiFePO4 from an DIY electric vehicle conversion I upgraded and drove for years. From that experience, I know they drop off rapidly in current capability below about 50F and drawing current below 2v/cell does permanent irrevocable damage. Otherwise they proved very robust and produce dramatically better in all regards than SLA for a fraction the weight. And I know they have a nice low self-discharge another nice long winter months feature.
Would still love to hear from someone who has had it longer than a few months.
Thanks though!
|
Close to two years, 370+ hours, and zero problems on the Shorai battery. Very happy with it and would do it again without pause.
__________________
Brad Benson, Maplewood MN.
RV-6A N164BL, Flying since Nov 2012!
If you're not making mistakes, you're probably not making anything
|

10-29-2015, 03:10 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Frederick, MD
Posts: 821
|
|
I don''t think anyone will disagree at this point, that any lithium battery chemistry can fail in a mode that results in the battery emitting copious amounts of noxious smoke and or fire. Even for Lithium Iron phosphate chemistries, a battery management system is necessary. For example, over discharging any single cell can induce failure on recharge sometime in the future. Lithium cells don''t tolerate over discharge at all.
I just reconfirmed via email from Shorai, that they do not have a BMS to protect from over discharge, over voltage, overtemperature or provide cell balancing. There are batteries out there that do. EarthX actually has robust BMS with some integrated redundancies. At least this system has a reasonable chance of preventing battery misues/abuse resulting in premature failures. Failures don't always mean fire and smoke, but often do.
I have driven certified batteries to failure during TSO testing (including LiFePo batteries), and you would not want to have this happening anywhere where the fumes or fire could get in the cockpit.
http://www.vansairforce.com/communit...i+battery+fire
This thread discusses what ended up being an overvoltage related fire on a battery with no BMS.
The risk is yours to take, or not, but you should understand that there is a better option.
__________________
Dan Morris
Frederick, MD
PA28-140
Hph 304CZ
RV6 built and sold
N199EC RV6A flying
Learn the facts. "Democracy dies in darkness"
|

10-29-2015, 03:49 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 1,958
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RVDan
The risk is yours to take, or not, but you should understand that there is a better option.
|
Which is what, Dan? Lead acid?
(Not a leading or laoded question. You seem to speak from experience but not sure what you were meaning here.)
__________________
Kurt W.
RV9A
FLYING!!!
|

10-29-2015, 04:30 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Prescott, AZ
Posts: 739
|
|
I think it's unfair to condemn all Lithium batteries because a few have failed. There many millions of Lithium batteries in use everyday without one problem. Lithium chemistry has been for a very long time. I can't remember the first time I saw a 3 volt battery in a PC, in the '80's. Lithium. Lead acid fails, NiCad fails, NiMH fails, Alkaline fails. I have a few friends using Lithiums in their planes without problems. When my PC680 slides into the afterlife I'll get a Lithium. They are in **** near everything nowadays.
|

10-29-2015, 06:20 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 1,565
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RVDan
The risk is yours to take, or not, but you should understand that there is a better option.
|
That's pretty subjective. Certainly not better in terms of cost, or weight. And with an EMS providing over-voltage warning coupled with some form of automatic over-voltage protection, along with regular cell balancing (I do it when I change the oil) there is little need for a BMS to prevent an over-voltage condition.
__________________
Brad Benson, Maplewood MN.
RV-6A N164BL, Flying since Nov 2012!
If you're not making mistakes, you're probably not making anything
|

10-29-2015, 09:39 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Frederick, MD
Posts: 821
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by krw5927
Which is what, Dan? Lead acid?
(Not a leading or laoded question. You seem to speak from experience but not sure what you were meaning here.)
|
Sorry didn't mean to be vague. I only said that because as experimenters we want to make risk decisions based on the money we trade to reduce risk. So I meant the risk posed by Lion batteries. You can choose the cheaper Lion batteries without BMS's and take your chances or buy one with a BMS and be "safer". The risk can be quantified very easily. A battery model with no BMS will have greater chance of failure with smoke and fire than a battery with one.
In the certified airplane world in addition to a BMS of a numerically quantified reliability, we are also required to have an enclosure that will contain and vent the smoke and fire overboard in case the battery fails that way. That is safe.
Responding to FASGLAS. I am not trashing the technology, just stating that there are known failure modes that lead to smoke and fire for all of th eLion chemistries. Some of these are user induced, like discharging the battery below the minimum voltage for the cells, another is high temperature environments, another is over voltage charging, and some are cell manufacturing related. I think there might be some science guys who could talk more to that, but the industry says that about 1 in 3 million cells will contain a defect that will cause the cell to fail by overheating. That number is about 3 yrs old, and not very well quantified by industry, since no one reports cell failures from the field, but that is their best guess. The simple addition of a BMS will go a long way to reducing all types of failures and given the sensitivity of the flight environment to fire or smoke, a good thing.
BTW, even the small cylindrical cells sold for your flashlight contain rudimentary bMS's. If you try to buy a raw cell without a BMS the cell manufaturer usually provides a statement that you must provide a BMS.
__________________
Dan Morris
Frederick, MD
PA28-140
Hph 304CZ
RV6 built and sold
N199EC RV6A flying
Learn the facts. "Democracy dies in darkness"
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:23 AM.
|