Quote:
Originally Posted by rightrudder
Good info, Derek. Am I right to think that with a little less pitch, take-off rpm will be higher and climb performance a little better than, say, a 70/72?
|
Yes, in fact I think you will be quite pleased. What was intriguing to me with the Catto was that even though I thought it was under pitched at altitude, I never thought so on the ground. My static run-ups were spot on, 2150-2200 if i recall, and climb was good to. I could just never firewall it, unless i was REAL high. Your ability to run lean of peak (with your FI), effectively reducing full throttle HP, might just make this prop a perfect fit for you.
I think BruceH runs lean of peak a lot on his cross countries, maybe he can chime on whether or not it allows him to firewall it?
Running full throttle on a carb produces more even fuel distribution, (butterfly straight up and down) but if your under pitched you can never do that unless you're really high up....
__________________
Derek Hoeschen
EAA Tech Counselor
RV-9A #92103 - N803DK
G3X, Superior XO-320, Dual Pmags, Catto 3B
www.mykitlog.com/dbro172/
1974 Bellanca Super Viking - N16AW - Flying
RV-8 #83565 - N184DK - building
1968 Mooney M20C - N6801N - Sold
1956 C-182 - N744W - Sold