VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > RV General Discussion/News
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

View Poll Results: Would you use a "turn-key" flight test resource package for your aircraft?
Yes, and would be willing to pay a small fee if professionally done 6 26.09%
Yes, but only if it's offered for free 2 8.70%
Maybe, I'd have to see a sample before deciding 9 39.13%
No, I'd prefer to make my own test cards and data plots 6 26.09%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 23. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-12-2015, 07:22 PM
Greg G Greg G is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Fort Walton Beach, FL
Posts: 11
Default Use for Flight Test Resources?

I've been searching the internet lately for some good resources (flight cards, procedures, data redux tools, etc.) regarding a flight test program for RV aircraft, and haven't found anything too comprehensive or "turn-key." AC 90-89B provides pretty good guidance, but is very generalized. I believe that testing your aircraft is a fantastic way to learn the particulars regarding how it flies in all portions of the envelope, and I'm pretty passionate about this work. I'm a career flight test engineer with formal education in the subject area, and am looking to see whether you guys would use these resources if I was to build a professional set... even if you're past the "fly off" phase and just want to learn more about your aircraft. I'm honestly not yet sure whether this is something that I could do quickly and provide for free, or whether it will take substantial time leading me to request a reasonable (small) fee. Please vote, comment below, or send me a message with your thoughts.

Thanks!
Greg
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-12-2015, 07:27 PM
Mike S's Avatar
Mike S Mike S is offline
Senior Curmudgeon
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Dayton Airpark, NV A34
Posts: 15,408
Default

Greg and I have discussed this a bit, and I suggested he ask the membership here.

I personally wish I would have had a set of "test cards" for my flyoff-------but that is just my opinion.
__________________
Mike Starkey
VAF 909

Rv-10, N210LM.

Flying as of 12/4/2010

Phase 1 done, 2/4/2011

Sold after 240+ wonderful hours of flight.

"Flying the airplane is more important than radioing your plight to a person on the ground incapable of understanding or doing anything about it."
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-12-2015, 07:49 PM
Ironflight's Avatar
Ironflight Ironflight is offline
VAF Moderator / Line Boy
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dayton, NV
Posts: 12,247
Default

There are people in the EAA working on this exact project right now - not sure the status, but I have seen drafts, and it will be a good thing.
__________________
Paul F. Dye
Editor at Large - KITPLANES Magazine
RV-8 - N188PD - "Valkyrie"
RV-6 (By Marriage) - N164MS - "Mikey"
RV-3B - N13PL - "Tsamsiyu"
A&P, EAA Tech Counselor/Flight Advisor
Dayton Valley Airpark (A34)
http://Ironflight.com
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-17-2015, 05:56 PM
Greg G Greg G is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Fort Walton Beach, FL
Posts: 11
Default

Thanks for the feedback! Glad to hear that EAA is taking this on. This is something I think is pretty important, and believe I have something to contribute, so I'll probably share what I put together anyways if even for free. Appreciate the help!

Greg
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-17-2015, 06:04 PM
Ed_Wischmeyer's Avatar
Ed_Wischmeyer Ed_Wischmeyer is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 1,301
Default

Back when I was I the EAA Homebuilt Aircraft Council, we got fairly far along on that but didn't take it to completion because staff was overworked, IIRC. Hopefully I've still got it on my computer. Send me your email address.

Ed
__________________
RV-9A at KSAV (Savannah, GA; dual G3X Touch with autopilot, GTN650, GTX330ES, GDL52 ADSB-In)
Previously RV-4, RV-8, RV-8A, AirCam, Cessna 175
ATP CFII PhD, so I have no excuses when I screw up
2020 dues slightly overpaid
Retired - "They used to pay me to be good, now I'm good for nothing."
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-17-2015, 06:10 PM
Auburntsts's Avatar
Auburntsts Auburntsts is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 2,861
Default

I voted no mainly because I was able to make my own using examples others had posted and other flight test resources ( the AC, EAA webinars, test flight articles, etc) available online and lived to tell the tale. However, I'm sure there are others that would prefer the turnkey option.
__________________
Todd "I drink and know things" Stovall
PP ASEL-IA
RV-10 N728TT - Flying!
WAR EAGLE!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-17-2015, 06:55 PM
David Paule David Paule is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 4,428
Default

I voted no because I intend to use examples which are already available and create my own using them as a basis.

I have a small bit of formal background in it and am looking forward to that phase of the project.

Note that here and there, some of the data is readily available. You can do a search for these documents:

USNTPS-FTM-NO. 108 Fixed Wing Performance

USNTPS-FTM-NO. 103 Fixed Wing Stability and Control

USNTPS-FTM-NO. 109 Systems Testing

And these will give you some background and in some cases might prove useful. Back issues of EAA's Experimenter over the last few years carried some good discussions, too, more oriented towards our aircraft but limited in topic.

Dave
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-18-2015, 12:20 AM
Vac Vac is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Niceville, Florida
Posts: 434
Default

Greg,

Sent you a PM.

Cheers,

Vac
__________________
Mike Vaccaro
RV-4 2112
Niceville, Florida
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-18-2015, 12:49 PM
AX-O's Avatar
AX-O AX-O is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,452
Default

I also thought about doing the same. But right now i am going through my own stuff and some docs from Vac, and dont have the time. Vac has done a great job with his doc.

Its a service just like those that go get help from a build center or pay for an instrument panel or interior. If you dont have the skill, you can get a better product from someone that does it for a living.
__________________
Axel
RV-4 fastback thread and Pics
VAF 2020 paid VAF 704
The information that I post is just that; information and my own personal experiences. You need to weight out the pros and cons and make up your own mind/decisions. The pictures posted may not show the final stage or configuration. Build at your own risk.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-18-2015, 07:16 PM
Greg G Greg G is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Fort Walton Beach, FL
Posts: 11
Default

Thanks guys for the good words and reasons for voting "no." I understand that some folks have more free time than others, so building your own program makes sense. I was just offering up my flight test background to help make it easy to collect data in-flight, then jam the data into a simple computer program that would generate the plots you need/desire for your POH. After all, who doesn't want to know the best rate of climb schedule and best range cruise speeds for your specific aircraft to save some cash on fuel?

Thanks again,
Greg
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:45 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.