VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > RV Firewall Forward Section > Traditional Aircraft Engines
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-07-2015, 11:33 AM
jdeas's Avatar
jdeas jdeas is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 626
Default Possible detonation or FOD?

Yesterday in my post flight inspection I noticed my alternate air door (vertical sump FAB) departed the aircraft, screws and all! This lead me to pull the plugs for a FOD inspection. What I found does not look exactly like FOD to me but it has me wondering if I am leaning to the point of detonation. The erosion on the piston head has be concerned. I have posted two photos 1 for scale and the other a closeup of the erosion.


Here is the closeup


The engine has around 150hr SMOH w/chrome cylinders and using a quart every 6 hrs. Is this normal erosion?
__________________
JD
----------------------
RV-7 N314SY (KWHP)
IO-360-B1B

CANbus based trim/flaps and electrical
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-07-2015, 12:09 PM
aerhed aerhed is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Big Sandy, WY
Posts: 2,567
Default

I don't think its eroded. Looks like an oil burn patina from breakin with a 100LL crust on top that chipped off.
__________________
Actual repeat offender.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-07-2015, 12:29 PM
jdeas's Avatar
jdeas jdeas is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 626
Default Lead deposits

Yes, consider the lead deposits only as markers. Look between the deposits where you can see the top of the piston directly. It's the pitted surface on the piston, not the lead deposits that worry me.
__________________
JD
----------------------
RV-7 N314SY (KWHP)
IO-360-B1B

CANbus based trim/flaps and electrical
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-07-2015, 03:46 PM
RV7A Flyer's Avatar
RV7A Flyer RV7A Flyer is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: US
Posts: 2,245
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aerhed View Post
I don't think its eroded. Looks like an oil burn patina from breakin with a 100LL crust on top that chipped off.
For those of us new to looking at cylinders with scopes...which is which?

Is the light sort of whitish area lead deposit or the piston?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-07-2015, 04:20 PM
aerhed aerhed is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Big Sandy, WY
Posts: 2,567
Default

The white stuff is lead. The dark area is oil burnt onto the piston. The pistons themselves often have a nubby surface that looks rough under a borescope. The only iffy spot I see is that gob on the edge at 4 oclock. Being rounded it looks eroded, but I bet its cooked oil.
__________________
Actual repeat offender.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-07-2015, 06:31 PM
Russ McCutcheon's Avatar
Russ McCutcheon Russ McCutcheon is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
Posts: 908
Default

If a screw went thru a cylinder you would know about right then, they don't run well at all with a screw floating around in a cylinder beating the heck out of everything including the spark plugs, (spark plugs look normal?) your photo looks totally normal to me..
__________________
Russ McCutcheon
@rv4welder on Facebook
russmccutcheon@gmail.com
We build many of your RV weldments.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-07-2015, 07:56 PM
BillL BillL is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Central IL
Posts: 5,515
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Russ McCutcheon View Post
If a screw went thru a cylinder you would know about right then, they don't run well at all with a screw floating around in a cylinder beating the heck out of everything including the spark plugs, (spark plugs look normal?) your photo looks totally normal to me..
+1 Ditto (8 9 10)
__________________
Bill

RV-7
Lord Kelvin:
“I often say that when you can measure what you are speaking about,
and express it in numbers, you know something about it; but when you
cannot measure it, when you cannot express it in numbers, your knowledge
is of a meager and unsatisfactory kind.”
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-09-2015, 12:22 PM
jdeas's Avatar
jdeas jdeas is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 626
Default Would this increase of decrease the danger

OK, looking for a simple change here. I have fabricated a new door for the alternate air and reenforced the ring in the bottom of the FAB.
It is easy to see this assembly is not only prone to failure once unlocked but also leaks a good deal of air.

Has anyone used red RTV to create a thin bond between the door edge and the frame (Fillet between door edge and mounting plate)?

It should seal the air leak, reduce the door vibration and make it more difficult to become unlatched but still be weak enough to shear when pulling the cable.

The danger comes in the RTV fillet. When it gets sheared by pulling the door open it is possible that some would get ingested (if both sides of the bond failed). Given its RTV, how much of a danger is this?
__________________
JD
----------------------
RV-7 N314SY (KWHP)
IO-360-B1B

CANbus based trim/flaps and electrical
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-09-2015, 01:09 PM
rvbuilder2002's Avatar
rvbuilder2002 rvbuilder2002 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Hubbard Oregon
Posts: 9,027
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jdeas View Post
OK, looking for a simple change here. I have fabricated a new door for the alternate air and reenforced the ring in the bottom of the FAB.
It is easy to see this assembly is not only prone to failure once unlocked but also leaks a good deal of air.

Has anyone used red RTV to create a thin bond between the door edge and the frame (Fillet between door edge and mounting plate)?

It should seal the air leak, reduce the door vibration and make it more difficult to become unlatched but still be weak enough to shear when pulling the cable.

The danger comes in the RTV fillet. When it gets sheared by pulling the door open it is possible that some would get ingested (if both sides of the bond failed). Given its RTV, how much of a danger is this?
RTV in any location that could get exposed to fuel (in this case fuel from a flooded engine, etc) is a bad idea. RTV will turn to moosh from fuel exposure.
__________________
Opinions, information and comments are my own unless stated otherwise. They do not necessarily represent the direction/opinions of my employer.

Scott McDaniels
Van's Aircraft Engineering Prototype Shop Manager
Hubbard, Oregon
RV-6A (aka "Junkyard Special ")
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-09-2015, 01:10 PM
vic syracuse vic syracuse is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Locust Grove, GA
Posts: 2,624
Default Dont do that

Fuel often runs down into the FAB, sometimes from overpriming. RTV is not fuel proof enough. It will get gummy and flake off and you will ingest it or perhaps even clog a jet.

You really want that door to open when and if it is needed, so I would be careful of putting anything there that could cause it to stick over the long haul.

Vic
__________________
Vic Syracuse

Built RV-4, RV-6, 2-RV-10's, RV-7A, RV-8, Prescott Pusher, Kitfox Model II, Kitfox Speedster, Kitfox 7 Super Sport, Just Superstol, DAR, A&P/IA, EAA Tech Counselor/Flight Advisor, CFII-ASMEL/ASES
Kitplanes "Unairworthy" monthly feature
EAA Sport Aviation "Checkpoints" column
EAA Homebuilt Council Chair/member EAA BOD
Author "Pre-Buy Guide for Amateur-Built Aircraft"
www.Baselegaviation.com
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:58 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.