VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > RV Ongoing Maintenance Issues
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-29-2015, 03:55 PM
bruceh's Avatar
bruceh bruceh is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Ramona, CA
Posts: 2,367
Default Failed experiment with my alternate air solution

I'm going through my first condition inspection at 106.3 hours. So far only a few tiny things to fix until I noticed that my alternate air sliding door that I fabricated seemed loose. Still in place and functioned fine. The design keeps anything from accidentally getting sucked into the engine, and that seems to have worked. Upon closer inspection it is easy to see why it is loose.



Just a bit cracked around the edges of the fiberglassing that I built up to hold the sliding door and underlying aluminum plate in place.

The underlying aluminum plate just slid right out after I got the airbox removed from the engine.



Looking at the failure, I think it just wasn't enough layups of fiberglass and once the vibrations got things loose it started weakening the structure.



So I guess this is why we "experiment". I am going to make some adjustments to the original design. First, I'm going to reinstall the aluminum plate with more G/Flex epoxy and this time I will put a couple of rivets through the plate and into the airbox to keep it secured even if the epoxy lets go. The shop ends of the rivets will be inside the airbox, but I will position them so they are safely under the rubber edges of the K&N filter. That way they still can't get sucked into the engine if the rivets break. Second, I will re-layup more fiberglass over the cracked portions and hopefully give it much more strength.

My original design and build photos indicate that I had only 4 thin layers of fiberglass on here. I should probably double that number just to be safe.

__________________
Bruce Hill
RV-9A N5771H flown over 800 hours!
http://www.overthehills.com/RV-9A-Project
APRS Tracking for KJ6YRP and New Flying Blog
2020 VAF donator
EAA Tech Counselor, Build assistance - canopy/tanks/fiberglass/electrical/repairs
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-29-2015, 05:46 PM
Steve Melton's Avatar
Steve Melton Steve Melton is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 2,787
Default alt air

humm, every alt air config I have seen in that location has failed in a relatively short amount of time. there must be a significant pressure pulse inside the FAB to cause that damage. if it fails the threat is no carb heat. the risk is potentially no carb heat vs intake obstruction. both are real threats with different values. I choose to remove my alt air config before first flight and glass it over. I am still looking for a better alt air config.
__________________
Steve Melton
Cincinnati, OH
RV-9A, Tip-up, Superior O-320, roller lifters, 160HP, WW 200RV, dual impulse slick mags, oil pressure = 65 psi, EGT = 1300F, flight hours = 800+ for all

Simplicity is the art in design.
My Artwork is freely given and published and cannot be patented.
www.rvplasticparts.com

Last edited by Steve Melton : 04-29-2015 at 08:24 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-29-2015, 06:08 PM
crabandy crabandy is online now
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Ottawa, Ks
Posts: 2,188
Default

I have a similar alt air design, Albeit more crude than yours. I have about 100 hours on mine with no issues.
I'm guessing that the entire FAB didn't crack, just the portion laid up on top of the FAB for the Alt Air?
I'm a total novice on the whole fiberglass airplane building, so FWIW....
I've had some of my experiments peel like that when I
A. I didn't properly clean the surface prior to "roughing it up" and ground contaminants into the surface I was fiber glassing to
B. I didn't properly rough up the surface aggressively enough, like 30-60ish grit
C. I didn't overlap (scarf) the edges of my new fiberglass enough

Good luck on your next edition!
__________________
RV 7 400 hours and counting
19 donation done
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-29-2015, 06:55 PM
AX-O's Avatar
AX-O AX-O is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,452
Default

what kind of joint did you use when you laid the glass? All the same size fiberglass sheets or did you overlap them growing in size?
__________________
Axel
RV-4 fastback thread and Pics
VAF 2020 paid VAF 704
The information that I post is just that; information and my own personal experiences. You need to weight out the pros and cons and make up your own mind/decisions. The pictures posted may not show the final stage or configuration. Build at your own risk.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-30-2015, 12:50 AM
bruceh's Avatar
bruceh bruceh is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Ramona, CA
Posts: 2,367
Default

I think the fiberglass I added just didn't bond well enough to the original FAB fiberglass. The cracking is around the edges where it lifted (or was pushed out by the high pressure from inside the airbox). There was 4 layers and they did overlap, but they just didn't hold on to the underlying material. The original FAB fiberglass underneath is fine and has no cracking. The cloth I used is just too thin for 4 layers to be enough structurally.

No worries about carb heat, since this engine is fuel injected.

Tonight I roughed everything up, cleaned it thoroughly and used the G/Flex epoxy to put the main pieces back together. Once that sets up I can do more layups over the cracks, and this time I will really get it roughed up so they will hold. I also put a rivet on the plate to physically hold it in place.
__________________
Bruce Hill
RV-9A N5771H flown over 800 hours!
http://www.overthehills.com/RV-9A-Project
APRS Tracking for KJ6YRP and New Flying Blog
2020 VAF donator
EAA Tech Counselor, Build assistance - canopy/tanks/fiberglass/electrical/repairs
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-30-2015, 10:50 AM
jjconstant's Avatar
jjconstant jjconstant is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Oakland CA
Posts: 771
Default

When I was going through the decision about FAB alternate air it seemed to me that the original metal flapper door with magnet holding it closed was the best solution and the problem they "fixed" with all the other arrangements was one of improper securing of the magnet, leading to it disappearing. I liked the idea the door opening automatically with no intervention needed in a time that would otherwise be very stressful (power loss on takeoff being the most stressful).

I simply used the old design with baffle material as the hinge but floxed and fiberglassed the magnet in very solidly. Still no signs of problems at 325hrs.

In the pictures it looks like a very clean separation between layers which leads me to believe there is a bonding issue rather than only a strength issue. It could be that I'm just not seeing things clearly in the photos. If you are bonding fiberglass to metal there are specific epoxies that are designed to do that well, and others that are notorious for not doing it well. I had Hysol recommended to me and used some that was provided by a friend. There seems to have been some major consolidation in the industry so I'm not sure what product to recommend now, but here is a possible resource: http://www.henkelna.com/us/content_d...ide_lo_res.pdf
Those better at research are welcome to follow up

All in the interest of education and recreation!
__________________
All Best

Jeremy Constant
RV7A "Stella Luna" ECI IO-360 WW200RV Pmags 360hrs
VAF 2019 paid plus some for those who can't
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-30-2015, 11:50 AM
DanH's Avatar
DanH DanH is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 08A
Posts: 9,476
Default

Jeremy and I are of the same mind here. Since you're reworking it anyway, perhaps you might consider a no-pilot-action-needed solution. Sucking up a bird or a plastic bag at 150 ft doesn't leave a lot of time for diagnosis and action.
__________________
Dan Horton
RV-8 SS
Barrett IO-390
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-30-2015, 12:46 PM
Steve Barnes Steve Barnes is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 580
Default What type of resin did you use?

A joint like that shouldn't fail. If the box is made of epoxy resin and you used poly-ester or vinyl-ester resins (the smelly ones) they wont' stick to epoxy resins. However epoxy WILL stick to poly-ester or poly-vinyl resins.

Steve Barnes (The new owner of FAIRINGS-ETC.)
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-30-2015, 12:54 PM
bruceh's Avatar
bruceh bruceh is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Ramona, CA
Posts: 2,367
Default

I used West System Epoxy resin on the layers that I added. The plate was glued down with G/Flex. Definitely a bonding issue on the layers I added, but made worse by pressure and vibration.

I'm going to continue to play with it and give it another shot. Worse case I can just grind it all off and fill the hole or use the original Van's metal mechanism (which I still have).
__________________
Bruce Hill
RV-9A N5771H flown over 800 hours!
http://www.overthehills.com/RV-9A-Project
APRS Tracking for KJ6YRP and New Flying Blog
2020 VAF donator
EAA Tech Counselor, Build assistance - canopy/tanks/fiberglass/electrical/repairs
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-03-2015, 08:43 PM
bruceh's Avatar
bruceh bruceh is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Ramona, CA
Posts: 2,367
Default

Fiberglassing done, looking pretty sturdy. I'm going to put some micro over this and then sand it down smooth for painting.

__________________
Bruce Hill
RV-9A N5771H flown over 800 hours!
http://www.overthehills.com/RV-9A-Project
APRS Tracking for KJ6YRP and New Flying Blog
2020 VAF donator
EAA Tech Counselor, Build assistance - canopy/tanks/fiberglass/electrical/repairs
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:41 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.