|
-
POSTING RULES

-
Donate yearly (please).
-
Advertise in here!
-
Today's Posts
|
Insert Pics
|

04-16-2015, 09:31 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: LI, NY
Posts: 409
|
|
IFR training, practice flying, safety pilot
I asked this on the AOPA forum but figured I would post it here as well. I am training for my IFR rating. I currently have just my private SEL. Here is the question, my plane is an RV-6, a tail dragger. I have many friends that could fly with me as a safety pilot but most do not have their tail dragger rating. When flying under the hood for practice, in VFR conditions, does the safety pilot need the tail dragger endorsement in order to act as my safety pilot. The regulations state he must be a private pilot with category and class ratings appropriate for the aircraft being flown. To me that is category, normal and class single engine land.
__________________
Richard Fazio
LI, NY
N966RV
RV-6 Slider
O-360
FP Wood Prop
|

04-16-2015, 10:05 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Davis, CA, USA
Posts: 539
|
|
Last time I looked at the regs, I came to the same conclusion. You can have a safety pilot that does not have a taildragger endorsment, same goes for high performance and complex.
Your safety pilot can not log PIC for the flight time though. (maybe SIC).
I've been a safety pilot in a high performance aircraft before I had those ratings. I didn't log PIC.
__________________
Jeff Caplins
California
RV7 N76CX
(started: Feb 2002 --> Completed: May 2016)
|

04-16-2015, 10:11 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Delaware, OH (KDLZ)
Posts: 4,194
|
|
All they are looking for is Single Engine Land. He doesn't need the tail wheel endorsement unless you are letting him land or take off.
|

04-16-2015, 10:33 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 2,861
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RFazio
The regulations state he must be a private pilot with category and class ratings appropriate for the aircraft being flown.
|
Don't forget they also need a current medical.
__________________
Todd "I drink and know things" Stovall
PP ASEL-IA
RV-10 N728TT - Flying!
WAR EAGLE!
|

04-16-2015, 10:33 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Hendersonville, NC
Posts: 186
|
|
Fun with the FARs
We just discussed this this week at our EAA Chapter meeting, and it's been one of my favorite FAR 'trivia' questions over the years, as there are so many divergent opinions. I once flew as an instrument safety pilot in a complex aircraft (hi Bill!), but I had no complex endorsement. So I've wondered and discussed for years... was it legal?
The opinion presented the other night was that the safety pilot needs to hold the appropriate rating only, and an endorsement is not a rating, therefore the flight was legal.
This letter of interpretation from the FAA backs up that conclusion as of 1991: http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/...rpretation.pdf
-jon
__________________
RV-6 | O-320 | Triple-bladed Catto
|

04-16-2015, 10:40 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Lake Havasu City AZ
Posts: 2,391
|
|
Endorsement
Quote:
Originally Posted by rleffler
All they are looking for is Single Engine Land. He doesn't need the tail wheel endorsement unless you are letting him land or take off.
|
That is not correct. If the pilot in command is comfortable with letting the safety pilot take off and land, that is legal, whether or not the PIC has instructors certificate.
There are many case where part 135 company instructors do not have an instructors certificate. They are simply designated by the FAA as company instructors. While taildraggers are very rare in this environment there are still a few around. Twin Beech, DC3 etc. A part 135 company instructor with no instructors certificate can train and sign off a new company pilots training in a taildragger. In the case of the DC3 a type rating would be required for PIC but copilot is just training and a sign off.
|

04-16-2015, 10:56 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Livermore, CA
Posts: 6,767
|
|
I think it's all been said. Your safety pilot most hold a private, or higher, license, and it must have Airplane, single engine land printed on it. As a required crew member he must hold a valid medical.
The requirements of a tailwheel endorsement, 3 landings in the last 90 days, flight review, etc., only apply if he is also going to act as PIC - the person legally responsible for, and the final authority for, the operation of the aircraft. Since it is your airplane it is highly unlikely that you would delegate that to anyone else.
Last edited by BobTurner : 04-16-2015 at 01:40 PM.
Reason: typo
|

04-16-2015, 11:00 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: LI, NY
Posts: 409
|
|
Thanks
Thanks guys, for all the info. This makes things much easier.
__________________
Richard Fazio
LI, NY
N966RV
RV-6 Slider
O-360
FP Wood Prop
|

04-16-2015, 11:56 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Landing field "12VA"
Posts: 1,529
|
|
Silly question...
just wondering. Is there a legal requirement to have a safety pilot? I assume the discussion pertains to a view-limiting device while practicing IFR procedures. Common sense says you don't don foggles or a hood without a competent lookout in the right seat, but common sense also says you don't gaze too long at the sexy colored light show on your glass panel in VMC instead of looking outside, either. My question is about regs, though.
-Stormy
|

04-16-2015, 01:05 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Livermore, CA
Posts: 6,767
|
|
see FAR 91.109(c)
Now if you want to open a can of worms, ask about the safety pilot logging PIC time.
Last edited by BobTurner : 04-16-2015 at 01:09 PM.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:06 AM.
|