VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Model Specific > RV-7/7A
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-01-2014, 11:43 AM
s10sakota's Avatar
s10sakota s10sakota is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Westland, MI
Posts: 311
Default Canopy: Change of mind...Maybe.

Has anyone ever ordered their fuselage kit and then changed their mind on the canopy? I bought the slider, and now I'm thinking I might want the tip-up.

It's not too late in my build to switch, but I'm wondering if it's worth it to buy all the needed parts, and then send the un-needed parts back to Vans.

I know I can call Vans and ask, but I thought I'd ask here first. I can't be the only one to ever change my mind...um, right?

PS: I'm not 100% sure I want to switch, but I think I just like the looks and the unrestricted vis better with the tip-up.
__________________
Mark Pensenstadler
1962 Piper Cherokee 160
2003 RANS S-10
2011 RANS S-6S
2011 Vans RV-7
2015 Zenith Cruzer
1962 Mooney M20C
2019 KITFOX Super Sport
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-01-2014, 01:15 PM
fstringham1 fstringham1 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Saint George, Utah
Posts: 13
Default RE: Canopy

Hi Mark

I built a tip up and have flown in the slider. This could be a primer type war ????
Slider is more water tight, better cooling on the ground, ease of use. Tipper clear view out front, better subpanel access, and a bit better baggage access in back. I worked on buliding both and I believe it is a toss up as to which is the worst in fab.

I must admit I sure liked the view out front in my tipper.

Anything is possible ..... Will just about anything .... I would stay with the slider. Get it done and go flying!!!!!!!

Last edited by fstringham1 : 11-01-2014 at 01:31 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-01-2014, 01:26 PM
alpinelakespilot2000 alpinelakespilot2000 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,642
Default

Though I am a completely happy slider builder/owner, I think both have their advantages, making it a wash in the end. For that reason, and because changing will probably require a significant outlay of additional cash, I'd say stick with what you've got. In the long run, you're probably not going to care that much either way.
__________________
Steve M.
Ellensburg WA
RV-9 Flying, 0-320, Catto

Donation reminder: Jan. 2021
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-01-2014, 03:36 PM
Captain_John's Avatar
Captain_John Captain_John is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: KPYM
Posts: 2,686
Default

Stay on track!

I say build what you have!

Being indecisive only slows you down. Nothing to it but to do it!

Both types, as we know have their benefits. Enjoy the benefits of the decision you made. Enjoy the plane that you will have built!

Mark, i also saw that you were interested in a partially completed six kit for a great price. Don't let these distractions cloud your end goal.

Build your plane!

. CJ
__________________
RV-7 Flying - 1,200 Hours in 5 Years!
The experiment works!
TMX-IO-360, G3i ignition & G3X with VP-X
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-01-2014, 05:32 PM
s10sakota's Avatar
s10sakota s10sakota is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Westland, MI
Posts: 311
Default

You guys are right! What the heck am I thinking? It would cost a fortune to buy new parts and then send these ones back to Vans. This airplane will never get done if I keep second guessing.

Geez...building on!
__________________
Mark Pensenstadler
1962 Piper Cherokee 160
2003 RANS S-10
2011 RANS S-6S
2011 Vans RV-7
2015 Zenith Cruzer
1962 Mooney M20C
2019 KITFOX Super Sport
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-01-2014, 08:23 PM
N941WR's Avatar
N941WR N941WR is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: SC
Posts: 12,887
Default

Now, about the position of the little wheel...
__________________
Bill R.
RV-9 (Yes, it's a dragon tail)
O-360 w/ dual P-mags
Build the plane you want, not the plane others want you to build!
SC86 - Easley, SC
www.repucci.com/bill/baf.html
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-02-2014, 01:54 AM
PIN 37 PIN 37 is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Adelaide Australia
Posts: 218
Default

Well, I spent 250 hrs on my tip up and I am not really happy with the result. I did talk to Gus about the abysmal fit of the tip up parts for the 7 at Osh.(2014) His response was that there was no money in it for them to improve the fit of the tip up, so nothing was going to be done. I, personally thought that this was a pretty poor response, but apparently that is Vans attitude. Thats what you get and if you dont like it, build something else. Personally, if they did offer a better fit/quality canopy, I would consider building a new canopy for fitment and "looks".
__________________
Phil
LAME (Aust)
RV7 99% finished
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-02-2014, 07:11 AM
Captain_John's Avatar
Captain_John Captain_John is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: KPYM
Posts: 2,686
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by N941WR View Post
Now, about the position of the little wheel...
Now that... Is a possibly valid alteration! Haha

I don't think that I know anyone (myself included) that is 100% thrilled with their tipper.

I do love the simplicity and visibility. That is the bed I made and that is what I sleep in!

I also fly a -6 that is a very nicely built slider. I guess that I either have the best of both worlds or the worstof both worlds, depending on you point if view!

CJ
__________________
RV-7 Flying - 1,200 Hours in 5 Years!
The experiment works!
TMX-IO-360, G3i ignition & G3X with VP-X
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-02-2014, 08:01 AM
petersb petersb is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 328
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by s10sakota View Post
You guys are right! What the heck am I thinking? It would cost a fortune to buy new parts and then send these ones back to Vans. This airplane will never get done if I keep second guessing.

Geez...building on!
I have had both. Tip on my RV6 1600 hours and slider on my RV7A, 200 hours.

By far I prefer the slider. Much nicer taxing in hot weather, I find the visibility superior, the front wind screen roll over bar becomes invisible pretty quickly, the improved visibility is to the side and rear due to the canopy shape and lack of roll bar behind you.

No more water getting on the instruments when the canopy is raised or during flight , access to the instruments I find is better as I have the panel attached to a mounting ring which allows removal of the panel with a few screws.

By the way, after several thousand hours of tail wheel time I do like having a nose wheel now, possibly age
__________________
RV7A New Dec 2013 - 360, C/S, slider
RV6 - 1600 Hours ---- Sold

Last edited by petersb : 11-02-2014 at 08:04 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-02-2014, 09:44 AM
Mel's Avatar
Mel Mel is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dallas area
Posts: 10,761
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain_John View Post
Now that... Is a possibly valid alteration! Haha
I don't think that I know anyone (myself included) that is 100% thrilled with their tipper.
I do love the simplicity and visibility. That is the bed I made and that is what I sleep in!
I also fly a -6 that is a very nicely built slider. I guess that I either have the best of both worlds or the worstof both worlds, depending on you point if view!
CJ
Well, I guess you don't know me. I've been flying with my tip-up canopy for 21.5 years and would not trade it for all the sliders in the world!
I absolutely love it.
__________________
Mel Asberry, DAR since the last century.
EAA Flight Advisor/Tech Counselor, Friend of the RV-1
Recipient of Tony Bingelis Award and Wright Brothers Master Pilot Award
USAF Vet, High School E-LSA Project Mentor.
RV-6 Flying since 1993 (sold)
<rvmel(at)icloud.com>
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:03 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.