|
-
POSTING RULES

-
Donate yearly (please).
-
Advertise in here!
-
Today's Posts
|
Insert Pics
|

07-10-2014, 02:03 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: The Woodlands, TX
Posts: 30
|
|
IO360 and mogas
I have read several posts where people are debating the merits of mogas vs 100LL. I can't seem to find any good thread on the modifications required to tolerate the ethanol in mogas. I am considering building an rv7 someday with the IO360, possibly electronic ignition. Just want more info on the possibility of using Mogas. Thanks
|

07-10-2014, 02:32 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: St. Paul, MN.
Posts: 4,792
|
|
Go here. And download the December 2013 newsletter. Pete Howell has a good writeup.
You can never go wrong listening to anything Pete has to say.
|

07-10-2014, 02:53 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: MN
Posts: 2,269
|
|
Dangerous Advice
My wife has other thoughts on the value of any information from this guy named Pete Howell.
Mogas use is a complex topic with many opinions on both sides. It has worked well for me in an O-320 with Electronic Ignition. YMMV.
Fuel Quality, compression ratio, ignition timing, and other factors are important considerations.
A good place to start are the archives here(search button) and at Avweb.
Given the price and future of 100LL - it is good to have options.
__________________
Cheers,
Pete
Amateur Plane - RV-9A N789PH - 2350+ Hrs
Amateur Radio - KD0CVN
Doggies Delivered - 25+
St. Paul, MN
|

07-10-2014, 02:54 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: The Woodlands, TX
Posts: 30
|
|
Thanks, that newsletter is great. I still wonder if there are any mods possible to make the fuel system ethanol friendly. I really like the idea of running one tank 100LL for take off and landing and keeping another full of mogas.
|

07-10-2014, 02:55 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Central IL
Posts: 5,514
|
|
Talking about 100LL in the $6 range and premium gasoline without ethanol at $4XX then the $2 gal savings at 7 gph is worth considering to me.
No ethanol for me though, not in an airplane - vapor pressure reasons.
__________________
Bill
RV-7
Lord Kelvin:
“I often say that when you can measure what you are speaking about,
and express it in numbers, you know something about it; but when you
cannot measure it, when you cannot express it in numbers, your knowledge
is of a meager and unsatisfactory kind.”
|

07-10-2014, 03:12 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 1,957
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BillL
No ethanol for me though, not in an airplane - vapor pressure reasons.
|
My take as well. Having designed and built a completely ethanol-tolerant fuel system, I found very early in Phase 1 testing that the higher Reid Vapor Pressure of mogas will likely prevent me from using any mogas in my airplane.
__________________
Kurt W.
RV9A
FLYING!!!
|

07-10-2014, 04:04 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Spring Hill, Florida; Flushing, Michigan
Posts: 105
|
|
Two cents worth
The second paragraph of Howells article defines Mogas as fuel with no ethanol. I have an STC for the Swift and have been running Mogas for several years with no problems. Test each batch for ethanol an haven't found any yet. I would never use automobile fuel (ethanol) for vapor pressure reasons. It is recommended to run a tankful of 100LL occasional to keep a little lead on the valve seats.
Using Mogas in the -7 with an IO360 is in our plans.
fly safely. 
__________________
Karl Bambas
1954 1st solo
1964 Mooney Statesman, 1979 C-172, 1948 Globe Swift (all sold)
RV-7 "Dream Weaver" N50KB
Empennage arrived 10/14
QB Wings & Fuselage arrived 06/15
Finish & FF kits arrived 11/15
Dual screen Garmin G3X instruments and harness delivered by Stein 01/16
First flight June 13th 2018
2020 Dues Paid
Builders Log
Family Blog
|

07-10-2014, 04:30 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 1,957
|
|
My vapor pressure problems were with ethanol-free mogas. Look at the ASTM specs for mogas. The Reid Vapor Pressures specified are, most times of the year in most locations, significantly lower than that specified for 100LL. Many people run mogas with no problems. I couldn't.
__________________
Kurt W.
RV9A
FLYING!!!
|

07-10-2014, 04:49 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Brisbane Qld. Aust.
Posts: 2,271
|
|
Gooday folks, I am not sure how many of you have actually done any real live testing of various fuels on an aero piston engine dyno, and certification testing for the FAA at that, but here are my thoughts on mogas in an IO320/360/540.
1. RVP is a problem and while one VAF member has built a system to mitigate against it I believe he still runs Avgas in one tank.
2. Latency, so with mogas and EI you get a peak pressure much higher and much closer to TDC than you do with the engines designed fuel and magneto's. Part of the reason those who do have extreme lengths to keep CHT's under control. They then get slightly better control of CHT but the ICP remains.
3. Gum buildup from much higher olefin content. Not worthy of the risk in my opinion. I have enough troll with my large HP outboards running good mogas.
4. No controls in place.
5. Finding, carting and storing (laws and by-laws, insurance) and the overall pain in the butt doing so.
6. Avgas is not going to vanish, it will become lead free, but it will remain.
You can run it in your carb engine as the RVP problem is less of a problem?..but the other factors remain.
These are not my opinions. These statements are from real data.
Pick your poison carefully, but do not buy one thing on the basis avgas will vanish, as 75-80% of the consumption is by folk who will not let that happen, and private O320 flyers are not in that bunch. The 80/20 rule applies here.
Hope that helps.
__________________
______________________________
David Brown
DYNON Authorised Dealer and Installer
The two best investments you can make, by any financial test, an EMS and APS!
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:03 PM.
|