|
-
POSTING RULES

-
Donate yearly (please).
-
Advertise in here!
-
Today's Posts
|
Insert Pics
|

10-02-2006, 08:18 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 60
|
|
Is this really real??
I don't know if this is a real tape of the Dover C-5 crash but if so then it is fascinating! Anyways take it for what it is worth.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_NqbT7ukUiI
|

10-02-2006, 08:34 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Port Orange, FL (7FL6)
Posts: 274
|
|
From what I understand it is real. For all of the checkairmen out there please take note the position of the thrust levers after the control swap.
__________________
Flying as of 1-12-2016!!!!!
|

10-02-2006, 08:41 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 60
|
|
Actually it appears they turned a normal Three engine approach into a Two engine approach. No one noticed that they pulled the wrong throttle back!
JMHO
|

10-02-2006, 10:37 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 1,849
|
|
It's amazing that with that many skilled people on board that they we able to drive it straight into the ground.
__________________
Todd
N110TD
RV-10 Vesta V8 LS2/BMA EFIS/One formerly flying at 3J1 Hobbs stopped at 150 hours
Savannah, GA and Ridgeland, SC
|

10-02-2006, 10:55 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 506
|
|
Wow, that's an eye-opener. Does anyone know...did they have the first engine inop'ed through some other means than the throttles (fuel cutoff maybe)? Hard to believe that they intentionally left 2 engines with the throttle out.
I wonder if they keep criteria for go-around during simulated emergency (like stick shaker, or terrain warning).
|

10-02-2006, 12:02 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Tehachapi, CA
Posts: 538
|
|
It was the first flight or so of the AMP C-5. I guess that new glass panel that was telling them they were too slow and too heavy was just too much info for them.
I love how the copilot asked to fly so he could get credit for an emergency landing. Classic.
__________________
Cam
Santa Ana, CA
RV-9 at KFUL
|

10-02-2006, 01:30 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 201
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by N916K
It was the first flight or so of the AMP C-5.
|
Interesting statement. Are you sure about that?
On another note... I came across this: Investigation Results
__________________
Mark
RV-10
On again, Off again Building
...currently Off
|

10-02-2006, 02:52 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Tehachapi, CA
Posts: 538
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by FlyerJumper
Interesting statement. Are you sure about that?
|
Yes, my girlfriend is in the C130 AMP program.
__________________
Cam
Santa Ana, CA
RV-9 at KFUL
|

10-02-2006, 03:13 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 201
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by N916K
Yes...
|
So, did you mean it was the first flight (or so) for this particular aircraft because I thought the first AMP flight was at the end of '02(?) This incident was in April of this year. 
__________________
Mark
RV-10
On again, Off again Building
...currently Off
|

10-02-2006, 03:25 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 58
|
|
C-5 Crash
I was a pilot flying C-5's out of Dover in the 70's. The two inboard engine thrust reversers are deployable in-flight. The Ramstein crash occured when an inboard thrust reverser deployed just after lift off killing the entire crew. This is why this latest crew shut the engine down as a precautionary. This was a total failure by all members of the crew, which is why they call them accidents. One thing is sure, this crew will never fly again.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:29 AM.
|