VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > RV General Discussion/News
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-02-2006, 08:18 AM
otterhunter2 otterhunter2 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 60
Default Is this really real??

I don't know if this is a real tape of the Dover C-5 crash but if so then it is fascinating! Anyways take it for what it is worth.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_NqbT7ukUiI
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-02-2006, 08:34 AM
flyboykelly's Avatar
flyboykelly flyboykelly is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Port Orange, FL (7FL6)
Posts: 274
Default

From what I understand it is real. For all of the checkairmen out there please take note the position of the thrust levers after the control swap.
__________________
Flying as of 1-12-2016!!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-02-2006, 08:41 AM
otterhunter2 otterhunter2 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 60
Default

Actually it appears they turned a normal Three engine approach into a Two engine approach. No one noticed that they pulled the wrong throttle back!


JMHO
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-02-2006, 10:37 AM
TSwezey TSwezey is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 1,849
Default

It's amazing that with that many skilled people on board that they we able to drive it straight into the ground.
__________________
Todd
N110TD
RV-10 Vesta V8 LS2/BMA EFIS/One formerly flying at 3J1 Hobbs stopped at 150 hours
Savannah, GA and Ridgeland, SC
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-02-2006, 10:55 AM
Paul Eastham's Avatar
Paul Eastham Paul Eastham is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 506
Default

Wow, that's an eye-opener. Does anyone know...did they have the first engine inop'ed through some other means than the throttles (fuel cutoff maybe)? Hard to believe that they intentionally left 2 engines with the throttle out.

I wonder if they keep criteria for go-around during simulated emergency (like stick shaker, or terrain warning).
__________________
Paul Eastham - Mountain View CA
RV-9A standard build, flying! ~300 hrs
EAA Chapter 338 San Jose
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-02-2006, 12:02 PM
N916K's Avatar
N916K N916K is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Tehachapi, CA
Posts: 538
Default

It was the first flight or so of the AMP C-5. I guess that new glass panel that was telling them they were too slow and too heavy was just too much info for them.

I love how the copilot asked to fly so he could get credit for an emergency landing. Classic.
__________________
Cam
Santa Ana, CA
RV-9 at KFUL
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-02-2006, 01:30 PM
FlyerJumper FlyerJumper is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 201
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by N916K
It was the first flight or so of the AMP C-5.
Interesting statement. Are you sure about that?


On another note... I came across this: Investigation Results
__________________
Mark
RV-10
On again, Off again Building
...currently Off
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-02-2006, 02:52 PM
N916K's Avatar
N916K N916K is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Tehachapi, CA
Posts: 538
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyerJumper
Interesting statement. Are you sure about that?
Yes, my girlfriend is in the C130 AMP program.
__________________
Cam
Santa Ana, CA
RV-9 at KFUL
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-02-2006, 03:13 PM
FlyerJumper FlyerJumper is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 201
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by N916K
Yes...
So, did you mean it was the first flight (or so) for this particular aircraft because I thought the first AMP flight was at the end of '02(?) This incident was in April of this year.
__________________
Mark
RV-10
On again, Off again Building
...currently Off
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-02-2006, 03:25 PM
ferret ferret is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 58
Default C-5 Crash

I was a pilot flying C-5's out of Dover in the 70's. The two inboard engine thrust reversers are deployable in-flight. The Ramstein crash occured when an inboard thrust reverser deployed just after lift off killing the entire crew. This is why this latest crew shut the engine down as a precautionary. This was a total failure by all members of the crew, which is why they call them accidents. One thing is sure, this crew will never fly again.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:29 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.