VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > RV General Discussion/News
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-01-2014, 06:57 PM
markscogg markscogg is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 306
Default Differential compression tester w/master

Just got a DIFFERENTIAL CYLINDER PRESSURE TESTER MODEL E2M with the .040 master orifice. This is to be used on a Lycoming.
When testing the master orifice, it only holds 44/80. Does that seem correct?
Thanks
__________________
Mark Scoggins
Charlotte, NC
RV-6 bought,flown and sold.
Rv-4 bought, flown and sold.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-01-2014, 07:06 PM
C-FAH Q's Avatar
C-FAH Q C-FAH Q is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 464
Default

Yep, that's correct. When in testing mode, the gauge reads the lowest allowable reading.
__________________
Gary Wilcox
St.Thomas, Ontario. CYQS
RV7 Sold
www.Facebook.com/Purplehillair
www.purplehillair.com
C-FAH Q now N281CT
gwilcox3 @ gmail.com
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-02-2014, 07:43 AM
markscogg markscogg is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 306
Default 44/80 ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by C-FAH Q View Post
Yep, that's correct. When in testing mode, the gauge reads the lowest allowable reading.
You could keep flying a plane if it tested 44/80?
I thought 60/80 was the lowest allowed.
Thanks
__________________
Mark Scoggins
Charlotte, NC
RV-6 bought,flown and sold.
Rv-4 bought, flown and sold.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-02-2014, 08:02 AM
az_gila's Avatar
az_gila az_gila is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: 57AZ - NW Tucson area
Posts: 10,011
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by markscogg View Post
You could keep flying a plane if it tested 44/80?
I thought 60/80 was the lowest allowed.
Thanks
Below 60/80 "...removal of the cylinder should be considered..."

http://www.lycoming.com/Portals/0/te...ompression.pdf
__________________
Gil Alexander
EAA Technical Counselor, Airframe Mechanic
Half completed RV-10 QB purchased
RV-6A N61GX - finally flying
Grumman Tiger N12GA - flying
La Cholla Airpark (57AZ) Tucson AZ
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-02-2014, 08:40 AM
cfiidon's Avatar
cfiidon cfiidon is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: California
Posts: 652
Default Big Bore Continentals

I can't speak to other applications, but I have a Bonanza with a Continental IO-550. Continental considers a cylinder "airworthy" if the cylinder compression is greater than the reading of the master orifice.

Don
__________________
RV-8 QB Titan ECi 191HP XIO-360
WW200RV Dynon D180 HS34 AP74
GNS430 SL30 GTX327 PS8000B Uavionix Echouat
"Pilots are alchemists... we turn gold into lead."
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-03-2014, 08:02 AM
AK4x4's Avatar
AK4x4 AK4x4 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: PAWS (Wasilla, Alaska)
Posts: 136
Default Lycoming SI 1191A

The low number with the master orifice open only applies to Continental engines and in my opinion is not a good idea. Lycoming SI 1191A gives the procedures and recommendations for compression test. My experience agrees with the service instruction guidance. I typically don't see a 320/360 with a hot compression below 70/80, even with times well over TBO, unless something is malfunctioning, worn out, or broken. Good Luck, Russ
__________________
Russell Brown
A&P/IA
"Happiness may never be sensibly pursued as an end in itself, because happiness is the by-product of achievement." -- Northcote Parkinson (paraphrase)
Wasilla, Alaska
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-03-2014, 08:36 AM
DanBaier's Avatar
DanBaier DanBaier is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Rochester NY
Posts: 669
Default

Quote:
You could keep flying a plane if it tested 44/80? I thought 60/80 was the lowest allowed.
Basically the answer to your question is yes.

Lycoming SI 1191A gives the Lycoming view. Continental SB03-3 gives their view. If a single cylinder is below 60/80 - something is going on and the engine is trying to tell you something. The Continental SB is a little more explicit about a borescope inspection (which is a really good idea).

My own feeling (admittedly and anecdotal sample of one) is that a compression check by itself is important, but not complete. Coupling the compression check with a visual inspection (as in the Continental SB) is a really good way to go.

My experience is that brand C and brand L engines have about the same failure percentages, but I agree with an IA who once observed to me that the difference is the brand L will usually get you home and the brand C is more of an "event."

So, for example, if I had a few years of all cylinders checking in the range of mid-70s and one year at the condition inspection one of them was in the range of 65, that's not so good. That it's over 60 is not a good reason to just sign off and keep flying. Similarly, if it were 58, it wouldn't mean that I'd just pull the cylinder (as per the Lycoming SI) solely on the basis of the compression test reading without doing some more analysis and inspection first (and the Continental SB is a really good source of info on how to approach this).

Dan
__________________
RV7A (N7101) - Flying 10/2008
CFI- SE/ME/Inst
A&P
KC2ZEL

Last edited by DanBaier : 05-03-2014 at 08:38 AM. Reason: Corrected for big thumbs
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-03-2014, 09:38 AM
Toobuilder's Avatar
Toobuilder Toobuilder is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Mojave
Posts: 4,643
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DanBaier View Post
...So, for example, if I had a few years of all cylinders checking in the range of mid-70s and one year at the condition inspection one of them was in the range of 65, that's not so good. That it's over 60 is not a good reason to just sign off and keep flying. Similarly, if it were 58, it wouldn't mean that I'd just pull the cylinder (as per the Lycoming SI) solely on the basis of the compression test reading without doing some more analysis and inspection first...
Agreed. The compression test is similar to the "punch test" done on fabric aircraft in the respect that the test itself is not definitive -it is merely a piece of evidence. The compression test is further compromised as definitive by the fact that your "58 PSI problem child" of today might be back in the 70's after the next flight. While that's admittedly a big swing and is indicative of an acute (and possibly temporary) problem, looking at my logbooks shows that I routinely get a few PSI swing from year to year.
__________________
WARNING! Incorrect design and/or fabrication of aircraft and/or components may result in injury or death. Information presented in this post is based on my own experience - Reader has sole responsibility for determining accuracy or suitability for use.

Michael Robinson
______________
Harmon Rocket II -SDS EFI
RV-8 - SDS CPI
1940 Taylorcraft BL-65
1984 L39C
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-03-2014, 11:08 PM
SHIPCHIEF SHIPCHIEF is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,412
Default

It's important to know where that air is leaking out of the cylinder.
If you get a low reading, take a listen at the exhaust pipe, air filter inlet and oil fill tube. The telltale hiss lets you know if you have a leaky exhaust valve, intake valve, or piston rings. This determines what you do next. Engines that have not been run for a while may give a poor compression check but return to good after being flown a few hours.
Although very rare, Intake valve problems scare me the most.
Every now & then the head or cylinder will be cracked, so a soot or oil stain may be observed on the outside as well. No way out, the cylinder comes off.
I advocate getting the full service life out of everything, especially your life.
__________________
Scott Emery
http://gallery.eaa326.org/v/members/semery/
EAA 668340, chapter 326 & IAC chapter 67
RV-8 N89SE first flight 12/26/2013
Yak55M, and the wife has an RV-4
There is nothing-absolute nothing-half so much worth doing as simply messing around with Aeroplanes
(with apologies to Ratty)
2019
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:35 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.