|
-
POSTING RULES

-
Donate yearly (please).
-
Advertise in here!
-
Today's Posts
|
Insert Pics
|

04-05-2014, 10:34 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Vancouver Island
Posts: 4
|
|
Turbocharged
Hey everyone. Very early stages for me. Pondering a -14 and wondering about the viability/wisdom of a turbocharged engine. There seems to be very few if any examples of a turbo'd engine application in RVs. Is it too complicated? Runs too hot? Does Vans recommend against it? I'd love to tap your collective knowledge and experience on this subject and hear the pros and cons.
Thanks,
John
|

04-06-2014, 05:25 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Brisbane Qld. Aust.
Posts: 2,271
|
|
Bang for buck.
I would love to Turbo Normalise our RV10, and I could but it is going to be a tight squeeze and expensive. You need to engineer inter coolers and exhaust plumbing, and I have the best mates in that exact business. But I am still NA.
If there were 50-100 firm orders for -10 owners I reckon we could do a good job, but that would be a minimum. As for -14 well there is not yet that many ready to fly. No doubt it will not be long, but how many would want to TN them?
Cheers.

__________________
______________________________
David Brown
DYNON Authorised Dealer and Installer
The two best investments you can make, by any financial test, an EMS and APS!
|

04-06-2014, 06:34 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: 8I3
Posts: 3,562
|
|
Its because RV's perform well enough without turbos, and there's not an abundance of room in the cowling which makes the task of putting a turbo on difficult.
__________________
Please don't PM me! Email only!
Bob Japundza CFI A&PIA
N9187P PA-24-260B Comanche, flying
N678X F1 Rocket, under const.
N244BJ RV-6 "victim of SNF tornado" 1200+ hrs, rebuilding
N8155F C150 flying
N7925P PA-24-250 Comanche, restoring
Not a thing I own is stock.
|

04-06-2014, 07:17 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: SoCal
Posts: 391
|
|
John:
Welcome aboard!
Bob's statement ("...RV's perform well enough without turbos...)" covers lots of ground; increasing the horsepower available at altitude makes it easier to approach, or exceed, VNE. Vans is against turbomormalizing the RV10, as seen in this article: https://www.vansaircraft.com/pdf/hp_limts.pdf
A search of this site will lead you to a number of discussions on VNE, turbos, and other speed mods to the RV line, many opinions, and some theories.
Good question!
__________________
______
VAF dues paid though exempt
RV-9A sold (I miss that bird!)
RV10 sold (miss that one too!)
RV-14A build underway
|

04-06-2014, 07:49 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 5,745
|
|
Lycoming offers the relatively modern TIO-360-EXP which is a pretty nice setup. I believe cooling can be addressed fairly easily. Not complicated. More expensive and heavier though.
Van's does not recommend turbos due mainly to Vne concerns.
You'd be hard pressed to make a good case for the turbo 360 vs. the atmo 390 in an RV unless you are based above 5000 feet and regularly fly high or have to fly high in the mountains. Due to the low Vne on most RVs, you can't really take advantage of the extra speed the turbo offers at altitude.
It isn't so much that it's hard to stay below Vne up high with some attention, it's more that if you hit turbulence near those speeds, bad things could happen and flying in the mountains can mean some rough air.
|

04-08-2014, 11:07 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Vancouver Island
Posts: 4
|
|
Thanks for the replies, fellas. Your input is pretty much on the mark of what I was thinking.
Cheers.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:34 PM.
|