VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Model Specific > RV-10
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #31  
Old 04-05-2014, 02:37 PM
sailvi767 sailvi767 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Charlotte NC
Posts: 1,166
Default

The J85 would quite if it sucked a leaf down the intake or the fuel control was not trimmed perfect and the throttle moved to fast at altitude. Overall I think however you will find the mean time between failures much much better for turbines. 18gph at cruise does not sound good enough However to make this viable. Turbines really need a pressurized aircraft that can get high and go fast.

George
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 04-05-2014, 03:59 PM
jdearborn's Avatar
jdearborn jdearborn is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Kennesaw GA
Posts: 141
Default

The Vne of the RV10 is for its current structure. It can be be reengineered and the Vne can be increased. I'm doubtful Van will do it, but it can be done. It can also be pressurized. It is all about money and desire.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 04-05-2014, 11:48 PM
paul mosher
 
Posts: n/a
Default money

Quote:
Originally Posted by MossieJim View Post
The Vne of the RV10 is for its current structure. It can be be reengineered and the Vne can be increased. I'm doubtful Van will do it, but it can be done. It can also be pressurized. It is all about money and desire.
That's correct, you can do anything if you throw enough money at it or you could just buy a lancair.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 04-06-2014, 08:31 AM
rocketman1988 rocketman1988 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Sunman, IN
Posts: 2,186
Default

"...So much for the vaunted turbine engine reliability..."

Ok. So let's compare stats, shall we? Why not look at all of the piston engine failures with respect to total time in operation versus turbine engine failures with respect to their total time in operation...

Oh, and as for the other post about re-engineering the -10 for a turboprop and pressurization. Yes, it can be done, but as a previous post said, you could just buy the Lancair instead...
__________________
Bob
Aerospace Engineer '88

RV-10
Structure - 90% Done
Cabin Top - Aaarrghhh...
EFII System 32 - Done
297 HP Barrett Hung
ShowPlanes Cowl with Skybolts Fitted - Beautiful
Wiring...

Dues+ Paid 2019,...Thanks DR+
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 04-06-2014, 02:23 PM
N427EF N427EF is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,516
Default

For a meaningful comparison you would have to take into account the number of turn on and shut downs, something turbines don't like very much or at least significantly reduces their time between overhaul.
The vast number of hours on turbines are accumulated on long flights where most piston engines are accumulating time literally by the hour, sometimes with continuous inputs from the pilot as in training.
I am guessing here, but most of us probably fly an hour at the time give or take, with friends for lunch or sightseeing and return.
I can't see climbing up to 18000 feet for an hour flight and start a let down just about the time you get comfortable looking at your turbine fuel burn and it's time to let down.
I am sure a handful of people would have the means to invest in such a venture but for most of us the Lycoming will be cheapest and best option for a long time to come.
As to the fuel argument, Lycomings run happily on mogas, available everywhere in the world even when jet fuel is not available.
__________________
Ernst Freitag
RV-8 finished (sold)
RV-10 Flyer 600 plus hours
Running on E10 mogas
Don't believe everything you know.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 04-06-2014, 02:39 PM
chrispratt's Avatar
chrispratt chrispratt is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 752
Default Have you considered Rolls-Royce

I may have missed any mention of this, so apologies if I did. But there is a new Rolls-Royce RR300 turboprop/turboshaft engine out. It is currently used on the Robinson R66 helicopter but it has fixed wing applications also. I have no idea of the cost or if Rolls makes it available to the E-AB market. Its power output is around 240 hp equivalent. Based on the M250 of which about 30,000+ have been built, it should be pretty reliable. Might make an interesting install on RV10.

Chris
__________________
Chris Pratt (2020 VAF DUES PAID)
RV-8 Flying, 850+hours
N898DK
Lycoming O-360-A1A, Hartzell CS
52F (Northwest Regional, Aero Valley, Whatever, TX)
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 04-07-2014, 08:48 AM
rocketman1988 rocketman1988 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Sunman, IN
Posts: 2,186
Default RR 300

Yeah that would be cool but with a SFC of .675lb/hp/hr you would have to carry a ton of gas...

That would be after you pony up $100K or more for the engine and prop...
__________________
Bob
Aerospace Engineer '88

RV-10
Structure - 90% Done
Cabin Top - Aaarrghhh...
EFII System 32 - Done
297 HP Barrett Hung
ShowPlanes Cowl with Skybolts Fitted - Beautiful
Wiring...

Dues+ Paid 2019,...Thanks DR+
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 04-07-2014, 02:50 PM
JDRhodes JDRhodes is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Taylorsville, GA
Posts: 748
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rocketman1988 View Post
Yeah that would be cool but with a SFC of .675lb/hp/hr you would have to carry a ton of gas...

That would be after you pony up $100K or more for the engine and prop...
I'm not sure $100K would touch it. You might buy one for $100K out of an old wrecked helicopter.
__________________
Jeff Rhodes - Taylorsville, GA
RV-9, 7 - going fast
BC-12D - going slow
jrhodes@v1salesmgt.com
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 04-07-2014, 04:11 PM
rocketman1988 rocketman1988 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Sunman, IN
Posts: 2,186
Default

Yeah, I did a little checking and they were more like $150K...just for the engine...
__________________
Bob
Aerospace Engineer '88

RV-10
Structure - 90% Done
Cabin Top - Aaarrghhh...
EFII System 32 - Done
297 HP Barrett Hung
ShowPlanes Cowl with Skybolts Fitted - Beautiful
Wiring...

Dues+ Paid 2019,...Thanks DR+
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 04-07-2014, 04:57 PM
jcaplins's Avatar
jcaplins jcaplins is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Davis, CA, USA
Posts: 539
Default

Just thinking out loud.... In the spirit of experimentation.

I wonder how a small jet turbine would work to supplement an electric aircraft?
The folks at Jag and ladrover are (were?) working on a small turbine for and electric car. Example of engine here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PFnZJeHc-KY

I have also seen an old video (and for the life of me I can not find it) of a gentleman who build a jet turbine for an RC plane in his garage. And not one of those crappy beer can turbines or those things that use a car turbo. This guy even made his own banjo fittings and bearings on his lathe. It was impressive.

I would think someone could scale one up and build it in their garage for way less than the $150K of a production jet engine.

And now with much lighter batteries available today...go the RC engine / charger / electric motor /batteries route.
__________________
Jeff Caplins
California
RV7 N76CX
(started: Feb 2002 --> Completed: May 2016)
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:33 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.