VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Avionics / Interiors / Fiberglass > GPS
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-28-2014, 11:36 AM
walkman's Avatar
walkman walkman is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 875
Default GTN 650 vs 625

I'm doing another panel rebuild and am likely going with the Garmin touchscreen G3X, an SL-40, 496. I'm struggling with the decision for the primary com/nav.

I have decided GTN over the older 430W. I'm trying to decide if its worth about $1,200 more for a 650 vs the 625 to get VOR/ILS/LOC capability especially at the rate the older ground based equipment is being phased out and the rate of new GPS approaches.

Thoughts?
__________________
RV-8 IO-360 (Bought)
RV-6 O-360 C/S (Sold)
Walkman aka Flame Out
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-28-2014, 12:10 PM
BobTurner BobTurner is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Livermore, CA
Posts: 6,767
Default

Stein will chime in soon, and tell you that Garmin often has specials on the 650, but less often on the 625, which brings the price difference down.

IMHO, you should ask yourself: do you ever shoot ILS approaches to minimums? ILSs still have, in general, slightly lower minimums than LPV approaches, and I doubt they'll go away anytime soon. Every once in a while the ILS will get you in when the LPV won't. So my vote is to keep ILS capability, but it's your money.

PS there is also the redundancy question - although gps has proved to be quite reliable, I like having options.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-28-2014, 12:11 PM
rleffler's Avatar
rleffler rleffler is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Delaware, OH (KDLZ)
Posts: 4,194
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BobTurner View Post
Stein will chime in soon, and tell you that Garmin often has specials on the 650, but less often on the 625, which brings the price difference down.

IMHO, you should ask yourself: do you ever shoot ILS approaches to minimums? ILSs still have, in general, slightly lower minimums than LPV approaches, and I doubt they'll go away anytime soon. Every once in a while the ILS will get you in when the LPV won't. So my vote is to keep ILS capability, but it's your money.

PS there is also the redundancy question - although gps has proved to be quite reliable, I like having options.
I couldn't have stated it better myself.

bob
__________________
Bob Leffler
N410BL - RV10 Flying
http://mykitlog.com/rleffler
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-28-2014, 12:21 PM
MarkW's Avatar
MarkW MarkW is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Edgewater, FL. KSFB
Posts: 1,116
Default

Ditto plus a GTN is an investment. 650 will be worth more to most.
$1200 is cheap in comparison.
__________________
Mark
RV9 - N14MW - Flying
G3X - ECI Titan I0-320
Catto three blade prop
http://www.mykitlog.com/MarkW
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-28-2014, 12:38 PM
krw5927 krw5927 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 1,957
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkW View Post
Ditto plus a GTN is an investment. 650 will be worth more to most.
$1200 is cheap in comparison.
One could also argue that a Val Nav 2000 or even swapping that SL-40 for a SL-30 or GNC-255A would give you similar capability and a bit more robust redundancy, being separate boxes from your GPS navigator. All similarly-priced to the $1200 you mentioned, within a couple hundred dollars either way.

You would lose the ability to auto-sequence between gps and nav that you may have with the GTN650 however. And maybe some other things I'm not aware of.
__________________
Kurt W.
RV9A
FLYING!!!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-28-2014, 12:50 PM
bill@fusion4.net's Avatar
bill@fusion4.net bill@fusion4.net is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Suwanee, GA
Posts: 415
Default Go with the 650

Save some money and go with the GTR-200 for the radio instead of the SL-40
and add some features and save some money to pay for the upgrade to the 650.
__________________
Bill Thomasson
RV-10 - Flying - Phase II. 99.8% done... it's never really done!
http://sites.google.com/a/fusion4.net/rv10/
Suwanee, GA.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-28-2014, 01:16 PM
BobTurner BobTurner is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Livermore, CA
Posts: 6,767
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by krw5927 View Post
One could also argue that a Val Nav 2000 or even swapping that SL-40 for a SL-30 or GNC-255A would give you similar capability and a bit more robust redundancy, being separate boxes from your GPS navigator. All similarly-priced to the $1200 you mentioned, within a couple hundred dollars either way.

You would lose the ability to auto-sequence between gps and nav that you may have with the GTN650 however. And maybe some other things I'm not aware of.
In point of fact this is exactly what I did - SL30 plus G-420W. I did not want all my eggs in one box. But to be honest the net cost was well over $1K more than a second com + 430W.
There is no loss of auto sequencing from gps to IlS - my GRT HX does it for me. In fact, I would say operationally it is easier to know if I'm on the VOR/ILS or GPS. With the 430 there can be confusion.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-28-2014, 01:23 PM
flyinga flyinga is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Fredericksburg, TX
Posts: 662
Default

I'd like to offer a contrary opinion. I chose the GNS 420W over the 430W for my RV8. Since installing the 430W in my Bonanza in 2002, I have NEVER used the VOR. I have shot ILS's but the GPS approach would have gotten me in. Most of the places I fly do not have ILS or VOR approaches. Yes, the GPS system could possibly go down but then you have ASR approaches at some places.

Flying is all about risk management and I felt the odds of the GPS system going down whilst in IMC are pretty small. I do carry a backup handheld GPS in case the 420W fails. Of course with a total electrical failure neither the GPS, ILS, VOR or ASR will help (without a handheld).

My $.02
__________________
Jim Averett
RV-8
TS36 - Silver Wings
Fredericksburg, TX
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-28-2014, 01:40 PM
BobTurner BobTurner is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Livermore, CA
Posts: 6,767
Default

Part of the equation for me was operational, more than risk management. I carry battery operated, hand held VOR and gps, as well as the SL30 and 420W. If I were, say, 3 hours from home and in IMC, and either the SL30, or the 420W, died, I would most likely continue home. If I had only one box, the 430W, and it died, I would land as soon as practical (assuming vfr was not an option).
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-28-2014, 01:59 PM
MarkW's Avatar
MarkW MarkW is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Edgewater, FL. KSFB
Posts: 1,116
Default

The 650 will auto load the freq to the nav when selecting an ILS approach. I don't believe it will do that for the SL-30. And I love the auto sequence from GPS to VLOC. Still learning the box and I am not sure I like the Touch screen but I like the rest alot better than the 430.

I was also taught belts and suspenders. I tune in VOR's even though I am on a GPS fligh path. When I depart an airport even close to IFR I have the LOC tuned for a turn around if needed.
__________________
Mark
RV9 - N14MW - Flying
G3X - ECI Titan I0-320
Catto three blade prop
http://www.mykitlog.com/MarkW
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:12 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.