VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > RV General Discussion/News
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-18-2014, 09:12 AM
aggie1998 aggie1998 is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 8
Default Why did you choose the RV-12?

For those of you who are private pilots and could fly any of the Vans designs, why did you choose the RV-12?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-18-2014, 01:01 PM
John-G John-G is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Northeast Ohio
Posts: 682
Default

Aggie - For me, the MAIN reason for choosing the RV-12 was that I can build the entire airplane virtually by myself. Have had help flipping wings and rolling the fuselage, but so far all major construction has been done solo. I don't need to do aerobatics or have a 200 mph cross country cruiser. To quote a friend of mine ... "I like flying. Why would I want to get there sooner?".


The RV-12 kit is complete and almost turnkey ? flip the last page in the plans and the airplane is virtually ready to fly. Doubt I will be doing any night flying, so although a licensed pilot, plan to fly as a sport pilot and forgo the hassle of taking the medicals considering the way I will be flying the RV-12.

Other factors - the RV-12 kit is relatively inexpensive yet complete. It has a good avionics package, complete wiring harnesses for the most part, fuel cost efficient and backed by Van?s years of experience producing quality kits which have parts that fit like ?OJ?s gloves?. Plus, it flies nice ... so overall, you get a lot of bang for the buck which is hard to come by these days.
__________________
John
www.dogaviation.com
RV-12 Wings, Empennage, Fuselage, Finishing, Avionics and Powerplant kits all completed
Now Flying!!

Donation paid until September 2021
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-18-2014, 01:27 PM
bhassel's Avatar
bhassel bhassel is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 963
Default

Total operating costs are lower than the other Van's models but really the first issue was the LSA non-medical. Once I got beyond that I realized I haven't flow in decades. Finishing off my 9 and flying around at 185 would probably mean I'd be behind the plane for awhile when my flying skills were weak.

Flying around at 125 to 135 isn't bad either. for a while I was thinking about just getting a really old 172 for half the price. Looking at operating costs, upkeep costs and that smell in the cockpit that reminded me of a grandma's old cloth couch, I decided new, updated and modern was the way to go.

I may still complete that 9A, but for now I'll be finishing the 12. My wife will be getting her license in the 12 and I'll be sharpening my skills all on 4 to 6 gallons an hour of auto gas.

The 12 is a lot easier to build than the 9 was (only worked on the 9 emp before life detoured my plans). I like being led by the hand through the building process. My life skills and experiences are in other arena's that don't include the necessary skills and experience to blindly go where no builder has gone before. Er...actually, that's probably exactly what would happen

Bob
__________________
Bob Hassel
NM


Subscription Paid for 2020

Home is where the hanger is...
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-18-2014, 03:43 PM
rgmwa rgmwa is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 1,647
Default

Some of my reasons for choosing an RV-12 over the RV-9 (my next preferred choice) or other manufacturer's kits:

1. Complete kit with all the hard parts - engine, avionics and wiring included. That got a big tick.
2. Total cost known up front. Another big tick.
3. Cheaper than other 2-place RV's (assuming all new parts).
4. One-person build due to pulled rivets. No need to find a helper for riveting and no rivet gun noise to bother the neighbours.
5. Removable wings make transportation, storage and maintenance easy.
6. Engine designed to run on relatively cheap unleaded but can also use 100LL if necessary.
7. LSA meant that both recreational and GA pilots could fly it, hence more sales opportunities should I ever decide to sell it, or keep flying it myself should I lose my medical.
8. Good enough speed and range for cross country flying with a reasonable amount of cargo capacity.
9. Excellent handling and flying qualities (according to all the reports I could find).
10. Great plans- easy to follow, plus very solid support from the company.
11. I always wanted an RV!

My plane is almost finished now (being painted). I've enjoyed every minute of it and haven't regretted my decision for a moment.
__________________
rgmwa
RV-12LR 912ULS
120346

Last edited by rgmwa : 03-18-2014 at 04:09 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:46 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.