Sorry that this is based on little experience, but I felt compelled to chime in.
First I am glad to hear of Roberts opinion, as his was exactly my first choice after doing a fair amount or research.
I actually ended up with ECI, non-tapered, Nickel carbide, 9:1 CR. I did not want to loose the weight offered by the experimental tapers.
I did go to Lycon for the porting. (Their recommendation was original Lycoming, but expressed no reservations with ECI and gladly took my bucks, quick service by the way)
Had I been able to get the hi-flow seats, I think I would have passed on the porting. (I could'nt talk ECI into putting the relieved seats in a non-experimental cylinder)
My results after 30 hrs - Great running engine and I think that the extra power is there. Still working out some kinks - make sure to confirm your timing is correct, especially if you increase CR. My CHT's were initially troublesome and getting the timing right (now 20 degrees advanced) helped a lot. I will probably be sending out my RSA/AFP injector to up the full power fuel flow. I have indications that the 17.5 gph that it is putting out right now at take off is not enough for the increased flow/HP that the engine is making.
Oil consumption is much improved and looks like it will be low.
The engine sound is "deeper" - suspect the porting here.
I chose these because I believe that ECI is working hard to advance the science of cylinder building. The fact that lots of reputable builders use them also influenced me. I think that the Ni carb has some advantage for us part time fliers.
Hope this helps. YMMV
__________________
Gary Reed
RV-6 IO-360
WW 200 RV now an Al Hartzell for improved CG
Last edited by gereed75 : 02-15-2014 at 02:27 PM.
|