VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > RV General Discussion/News
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-02-2013, 11:44 AM
jj_jetmech jj_jetmech is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Klgb
Posts: 125
Default Am I dimpling enough? Can a perfect flat surface really be achieved?

So I'm 90% done with my empennage and expect the Fuse kit to ship 12/9.. I'm looking at my finished work and wondering if it could be better I have dimpled everything possible with a c-frame standard dies on all parts, I have a full halo and what appear to be crisp dimples, rivets sitting down nice and flush...Once riveted it looks good but some distortion surrounds all rivets... Material is stretched and a rivet smashed into it....How can there not be? I've looked at many airplanes and build site photos.. Looks like my results are consistent with what I am seeing in others work... I've experimented with SS and tank dies on sample material (SS die on some 032 and normal die on overlying 020) same results. I have a Bonanza and a Cherokee in my hanger right now and everywhere there is a rivet on these airplanes there is minor skin distortion, when viewed at the proper angle.... Just like my 7 tail...

I see people making claims that their skins are perfect like glass and if not you probably don't know how to dimple?????? Or rivet? Can this be true?

Is it possible to have zero distortion? if so how do I achieve this ?

I've seen some bad RV tails and I don't think my work falls into that category but if I'm wrong now is the time to fix it...

Input appreciated!

Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-02-2013, 12:46 PM
TS Flightlines TS Flightlines is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Ridgeland, SC
Posts: 2,584
Default

I'm no expert, but I used the Hydro-Pneumatic crimper with dimple dies to make my dimples on everyplace the the head would reach. Easy, and repeatable. Going to make a fixture to attach it the the DRDT-2.
Tom
__________________
Tom Swearengen, TS Flightlines LLC, AS Flightlines
Joint Venture with Aircraft Specialty
Teflon Hose Assemblies for Experimentals
Proud Vendor for RV1, Donator to VAF
RV7 Tail Kit Completed, Fuse started-Pay as I go Plan
Ridgeland, SC
www.tsflightlines.com, www.asflightlines.com
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-02-2013, 01:04 PM
rvbuilder2002's Avatar
rvbuilder2002 rvbuilder2002 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Hubbard Oregon
Posts: 9,027
Default

Overall skin finish quality is based on two separate process...
Part prep and riveting technique (I.E. someone with a lower riveting skill level can make perfectly prepped parts look bad - a pro riveter can't make poorly prepped parts look great).

Your description of a full halo doesn't tell the entire story because that means different things to different people.
Basically, a properly formed dimple will result in the entire footprint / contact area of the dimple die being scuffed/discolored on the skin surface.
If you only have a scuffed ring around the outer perimeter, the dies did not fully seat.
The best thing to do is learn how to read the skin for flatness using the skin reflection as described in the latest rev. of Section 5

My personal list of tools for dimpling in order of finish quality are
1. C-frame tool (particularly on larger dimples and/or thicker skins)
2. Pneumatic squeezer (only use it if I have to)
3. hand squeezer (never use it on exterior skins)

I know many people use the DRDT-2 tool. My experience is that it is not quite as good as the c-frame (particularly on thicker skins), but it may have been the particular tool I used.

If you are able to determine that your dimples are well formed using the skin reflection, then riveting technique would be evaluated.
__________________
Opinions, information and comments are my own unless stated otherwise. They do not necessarily represent the direction/opinions of my employer.

Scott McDaniels
Van's Aircraft Engineering Prototype Shop Manager
Hubbard, Oregon
RV-6A (aka "Junkyard Special ")
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-02-2013, 01:41 PM
Sid Lambert Sid Lambert is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: North Atlanta
Posts: 1,120
Default

I picked up a set of the Economy dimple dies from ACS for use on my current project. I dimpled my first skin, a horizontal stab skin, and the skin was completely bowed using the c-frame and a deadblow hammer like I have many times before. I pulled out my trusty 10 year old Avery dimple dies and redid the skin. It came out perfect as usual.

So far in my experience these are the do's & don't of dimpling...

Use a c-frame with a deal blow hammer whenever possible.
Use 2 solid blows per dimple. If you can't get a solid hit on it then multiple softer blows is fine.
Never use a framing hammer.
Never let the return spring on the c-frame allow a space between the skin and die before hitting it. I just removed the return spring.
Don't be scared to modify the outside diameter of a die to allow proper fit. It's better to buy another set than put stress on the web-to-flange radius.
Always c-frame dimple tank skins.
__________________
Sid Lambert

RV-7 Sold
RV-4 - Flying - O-320 Fixed Pitch - Red over Yellow

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-02-2013, 02:15 PM
jj_jetmech jj_jetmech is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Klgb
Posts: 125
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rvbuilder2002 View Post
Overall skin finish quality is based on two separate process...
Part prep and riveting technique (I.E. someone with a lower riveting skill level can make perfectly prepped parts look bad - a pro riveter can't make poorly prepped parts look great).

Your description of a full halo doesn't tell the entire story because that means different things to different people.
Basically, a properly formed dimple will result in the entire footprint / contact area of the dimple die being scuffed/discolored on the skin surface.
If you only have a scuffed ring around the outer perimeter, the dies did not fully seat.
The best thing to do is learn how to read the skin for flatness using the skin reflection as described in the latest rev. of Section 5

My personal list of tools for dimpling in order of finish quality are
1. C-frame tool (particularly on larger dimples and/or thicker skins)
2. Pneumatic squeezer (only use it if I have to)
3. hand squeezer (never use it on exterior skins)

I know many people use the DRDT-2 tool. My experience is that it is not quite as good as the c-frame (particularly on thicker skins), but it may have been the particular tool I used.

If you are able to determine that your dimples are well formed using the skin reflection, then riveting technique would be evaluated.
I have all those tools and getting a full footprint from the dimple.... Rivets look to be properly seated...gauged by overlaying a straightedge or razor blade....I am using the C frame.... First and When able, second is a large hand squeezer last the pneumatic.. The skin is perfectly flat until riveted... When riveted it will draw itself the skin to the structure this is where I believe the slight distortion occurs... Not sure this can be avoided? Without a lot of additional work to understructure?

I would be interested to see pictures of these perfect dimpled, rivet rows... Now that I'm finally building my own airplane I am certainly looking at things a bit different... Maybe over critical.... I can walk outside my hanger and look at Gulfstream's, BBJ's etc. and they certainly aren't to worried about slight distortions from the process....

Thanks for you comment's
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-02-2013, 02:31 PM
David Paule David Paule is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 4,428
Default

Here's a shot of David Howe's Rocket. This plane has the best riveting I've seen thus far. In fact, the whole airplane was so interesting I plumb forgot to ask about his riveting technique - although I did get to see some of his custom frames, including one extremely stout one that used the 6,000 lb. pneumatic squeezer (the common squeezer is only half that).

There's no filling on his wings.



Dave
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-02-2013, 03:05 PM
WAM120RV WAM120RV is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Coventry. England
Posts: 614
Default Back rivetting.

The best way to achieve that flat finish is to back rivet everything you can. I have the offset back rivet set for getting behind the ribs to achieve the best result I can.
__________________
http://www.aerobuilder.blogspot.com


Steve Arnold
England

In completion stage of Loehle P5151
Built and now Flying G.BVLR Vans RV4
Rebuilt G.BDBD Tailwind
Rebuilt G BVTN Kitfox
Built G CDCD RV9A with WAM120
Riveted wings on Glastar G.LEZZ Now (G. SKUA)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-02-2013, 04:15 PM
jthocker's Avatar
jthocker jthocker is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 1,060
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sid Lambert View Post
I picked up a set of the Economy dimple dies from ACS for use on my current project. I dimpled my first skin, a horizontal stab skin, and the skin was completely bowed using the c-frame and a deadblow hammer like I have many times before. I pulled out my trusty 10 year old Avery dimple dies and redid the skin. It came out perfect as usual.

So far in my experience these are the do's & don't of dimpling...

Use a c-frame with a deal blow hammer whenever possible.
Use 2 solid blows per dimple. If you can't get a solid hit on it then multiple softer blows is fine.
Never use a framing hammer.
Never let the return spring on the c-frame allow a space between the skin and die before hitting it. I just removed the return spring.
Don't be scared to modify the outside diameter of a die to allow proper fit. It's better to buy another set than put stress on the web-to-flange radius.
Always c-frame dimple tank skins.
This is great advice, along with Scott's. I always use the c-frame with 2 good blows with the dead blow hammer. I'm not sure you can get as good a dimple with a DRDT, as you can with 2 solid blows with a c frame.
Besides the c frame is a lot quicker in my opinion.
__________________
Jon Thocker
Habitual Offender
RV4, RV4, RV6A, RV8, RV8, RV8,RV8, RV8, RV8, RV12
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-02-2013, 08:13 PM
Ron RV8's Avatar
Ron RV8 Ron RV8 is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Okanagan Valley BC, Canada
Posts: 482
Default

I'm no pro but there always seems to be a slight amount of distortion along the rivet lines. I used a DRDT2 and hand held squeezer both with the hydropneumatic system from Cleaveland Tools for dimpling and am pretty pleased with the results. I also used their tank dies. For riveting I back riveted where possible, used the hydropneumatic squeezer when I could and used a rubber surrounded swivel mushroom set for the rest of the flush riveting.

When I needed a helper for riveting I spent a bit of time with them driving "practice" rivets before we got into the expensive stuff. Where possible I tried to start about the middle of a rivet line, and work towards the free ends of a panel. My thoughts were trying to avoid trapping any sort of bulge in the middle...

As far as speed goes, once I got in the swing of it, I found I could dimple at a rate of about 1 per second with the DRDT2 with the hydropneumatic head.

Here's a few shots of my far from perfect (first time builder) results as a data point... A lot of credit goes to some pretty careful (though inexperienced) helpers...





__________________
Ron Townson
Okanagan Valley BC, Canada
RV-8 Completed Dec 2013

Membership renewed Sept 8, 2019
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-02-2013, 08:51 PM
aerhed aerhed is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Big Sandy, WY
Posts: 2,567
Default

http://s954.photobucket.com/user/aer...tml?sort=3&o=0
These were done using a 3/4 thick plate with a male dimple set in a hole. The female in a 6 x 3/4 handset and a 12oz ball peen. So, it's not just the size of the tool. It's also how you use it.
__________________
Actual repeat offender.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:54 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.