VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Avionics / Interiors / Fiberglass > Glass Cockpit
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #51  
Old 09-10-2013, 07:50 AM
GalinHdz's Avatar
GalinHdz GalinHdz is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: KSGJ / TJBQ
Posts: 2,039
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rzbill View Post
All the real stuff happened over at the Mechanical and Aerospace building.
But everybody knows the real engineers are made at the Electrical building.

Quote:
Originally Posted by rzbill View Post
Anybody that claimed they understood Maxwells equations was lying. (Navier-Stokes is a piece of cake however )
The only Maxwell I want to remember is Maxwell Smart, Agent 86. All those dead physicist (including Faraday, Kirckhoff, Thevenin and others) were erased from my memory a long time ago.

Last edited by GalinHdz : 09-10-2013 at 07:53 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 09-10-2013, 01:02 PM
BobTurner BobTurner is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Livermore, CA
Posts: 6,797
Default

One data point: a few years ago I ferried a 182 from CA to Wisconsin. It had both a vacuum AI and an electric AI (mechanical). By the time the trip was over neither worked!
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 09-10-2013, 04:18 PM
SteinAir SteinAir is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 2,473
Default

This has been an entertaining read at some points! I don't have a lot to add to the discussion, because to be quite blunt the entire subject of "steam vs. mechanical" when it comes to attitude indicators specifically is sort of dubious use of time. The reason being, no matter what we think, how much we may like or dislike spinning gyros, anecdotal discussions about glass, etc.. the fact is that a spinning gyro is a dinosaur and quickly going the way of the dodo. We've already crossed the point where it is cheaper to make a digital AI than it is to make a mechanical one and despite anecdotal evidence to the contrary, fact is the solid state units are many times more reliable than their spinning mass metal counterparts. They are also cheaper to build, lighter and more accurate.

Not only are spinning metal wheels on their way out, but so aneroid altimeters, bellows driven encoders, ASI's, etc.. All of it is just going away no matter what we say or how we discuss it. So while a number of us may like or dislike the round "steam instruments", the fact is that the world is just blowing past them. I'd surmise that any mfgr who sticks with making purely mechanical instruments will find themselves like Polaroid/Kodak while the rest of the world flies by them...and yes...I know there are still fans of actual film!

Lastly, if the FAR23 re-write goes through looking anything like it currently does it'll likely be the death knoll for the few surviving steam instruments on the market. I know some may find this post offensive, but I look at it as just being brutally blunt....and since somebody brought up Maxwell Smart, I'll quote Joe Friday: "just the facts, ma'am"!

Cheers,
Stein
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 09-10-2013, 06:42 PM
Snowflake's Avatar
Snowflake Snowflake is online now
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Victoria, BC, Canada
Posts: 3,932
Default

Finally a voice of reason.

On the other hand, if I took all of the steam gauges out of my panel, i'd have to install a constant-speed prop to correct the Aft CG condition i'd create... Hmmm... Stein doesn't sell props, do they?
__________________
Rob Prior
1996 RV-6 "Tweety" C-FRBP (formerly N196RV)
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 09-10-2013, 10:35 PM
rzbill's Avatar
rzbill rzbill is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Asheville, NC
Posts: 2,692
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SteinAir View Post
This has been an entertaining read at some points! I don't have a lot to add to the discussion, because to be quite blunt the entire subject of "steam vs. mechanical" when it comes to attitude indicators specifically is sort of dubious use of time. The reason being, no matter what we think, how much we may like or dislike spinning gyros, anecdotal discussions about glass, etc.. the fact is that a spinning gyro is a dinosaur and quickly going the way of the dodo. We've already crossed the point where it is cheaper to make a digital AI than it is to make a mechanical one and despite anecdotal evidence to the contrary, fact is the solid state units are many times more reliable than their spinning mass metal counterparts. They are also cheaper to build, lighter and more accurate.

Not only are spinning metal wheels on their way out, but so aneroid altimeters, bellows driven encoders, ASI's, etc.. All of it is just going away no matter what we say or how we discuss it. So while a number of us may like or dislike the round "steam instruments", the fact is that the world is just blowing past them. I'd surmise that any mfgr who sticks with making purely mechanical instruments will find themselves like Polaroid/Kodak while the rest of the world flies by them...and yes...I know there are still fans of actual film!

Lastly, if the FAR23 re-write goes through looking anything like it currently does it'll likely be the death knoll for the few surviving steam instruments on the market. I know some may find this post offensive, but I look at it as just being brutally blunt....and since somebody brought up Maxwell Smart, I'll quote Joe Friday: "just the facts, ma'am"!

Cheers,
Stein
Hold on while I record this on my BetaMax...
__________________
Bill Pendergrass
ME/AE '82
RV-7A: Flying since April 15, 2012. 850 hrs
YIO-360-M1B, mags, CS, GRT EX and WS H1s & A/P, Navworx
Unpainted, polished....kinda'... Eyeballin' vinyl really hard.
Yeah. The boss got a Silhouette Cameo 4 Xmas 2019.
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 09-11-2013, 04:19 AM
pierre smith's Avatar
pierre smith pierre smith is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Louisville, Ga
Posts: 7,840
Default Thumbs up for Stein.

I'm too old to take chances and Stein's remarks could have been mine. I have two old, legacy Dynons, a 100 and a 120. They're going on six years old and 600 hours and have never missed a beat. They've kept me right side up in blinding rain (that removed some paint) and under leading-edge ice.

Over my 46 years of flying, I've had my share of DG and AI failures and have read of many fatals as a result of this.

Best,
__________________
Pierre Smith
RV-10, 510 TT
RV6A (Sojourner) 180 HP, Catto 3 Bl (502Hrs), gone...and already missed
Air Tractor AT 502B PT 6-15 Sold
Air Tractor 402 PT-6-20 Sold
EAA Flight Advisor/CFI/Tech Counselor
Louisville, Ga

It's never skill or craftsmanship that completes airplanes, it's the will to do so,
Patrick Kenny, EAA 275132


Dues gladly paid!
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 09-11-2013, 05:55 AM
rzbill's Avatar
rzbill rzbill is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Asheville, NC
Posts: 2,692
Default

Y'know, after seeing the comments about failed mechanical gyro's I wanted to say sure I agree with that. I have a TT backup attitude instrument so I don't have a leg to stand on argument wise. The backups I have trouble giving up are the barometric ones that are bone simple. ASI, VSI , ALT

We'll see, maybe a future panel upgrade gets a Gemini and a rack of AA batteries or something
__________________
Bill Pendergrass
ME/AE '82
RV-7A: Flying since April 15, 2012. 850 hrs
YIO-360-M1B, mags, CS, GRT EX and WS H1s & A/P, Navworx
Unpainted, polished....kinda'... Eyeballin' vinyl really hard.
Yeah. The boss got a Silhouette Cameo 4 Xmas 2019.
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 09-14-2013, 11:52 PM
Finley Atherton Finley Atherton is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: AUSTRALIA
Posts: 749
Default

I have been flying VFR behind an EFIS and a traditional ASI for years and was happy with the EFIS altitude display although I always looked at the traditional ASI for airspeed rather than the EFIS.

Recently I upgraded the panel to IFR and added another EFIS. CASA, our regulator in Australia required me to also install a TSO'd altimeter so I installed a traditional altimeter. Naturally I was annoyed about this requirement as I already had two independent altimeters. However I will admit that that the traditional altimeter is now the one I automatically look at. I find the EFIS altimeters are just not as intuitive as the traditional round instrument.

Fin
9A
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 09-15-2013, 11:06 PM
dutchroll dutchroll is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 123
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Finley Atherton View Post
CASA, our regulator in Australia required me to also install a TSO'd altimeter so I installed a traditional altimeter.
I can't find anywhere in the legislation where an uncertified aircraft is required to have a TSO'd altimeter. However the new amendment to CAO 100.5 which dictates testing requirements for pitot static instruments is pretty arduous, so it would probably pay to have a TSO'd one anyway, from a reputable manufacturer.

None of this is surprising, as what CASA inspectors say and what the legislation actually says can be difficult to reconcile. In fact even the opinion between inspectors can be quite different, as I've found out! I suspect our brethren in the USA probably find much the same with the FAA!
__________________
Mike
Down Under
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 09-16-2013, 12:29 AM
Finley Atherton Finley Atherton is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: AUSTRALIA
Posts: 749
Default

My answer below concerns Australian regulations but USA RVers should take note that CASA our regulator is currently reviewing the use of non TSO'd instruments in experimental aircraft (see Project CS13/01). Any changes would most likely only effect IFR experimental aircraft but who knows what draconian and expensive rules they will come up with. We supposedly have similar experimental regulations to the USA - so be warned!

Quote:
Originally Posted by dutchroll View Post
I can't find anywhere in the legislation where an uncertified aircraft is required to have a TSO'd altimeter.
Mike,
I don't pretend to have a deep understanding of this but I think in theory you are correct about not requiring a TSO'd altimeter, however I was told there is some catch all regulation that somehow allows CASA to basically specify whatever they think is necessary to ensure safety.

The bottom line is that my AP (Authorised Person) could not get the particular person he was dealing with in CASA to approve my IFR Airworthiness Certification unless I had a TSO'd altimeter installed.

What was particularly galling is that a friend with an RV10 and virtually the same equipment as me used a different AP and got IFR Certification at pretty much the same time as me without needing a TSO'd altimeter. So it seems different rules depending on who you are dealing with in CASA!

Fin
9A

Last edited by Finley Atherton : 09-16-2013 at 12:39 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:56 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.