VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > RV General Discussion/News
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-22-2013, 07:26 PM
tkatc's Avatar
tkatc tkatc is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,747
Default Making the major decisions...

I've come to the point of my build where I have to make the major decisions about engine and prop. I find myself overwhelmed and unarmed. There are several companies to choose from and most of the websites are not very informative. At least not for the amateur builder. There are sooo many options to choose from. How do you guys make these decisions? Where do you even start? Upgraded rollers? Cold air sump? What is the difference between B1B and an M1S? Do you go with ECI components or opt for Superior? And why?

I do have some of the basic choices narrowed down but still need help. The engine will be new. The engine will be fuel injected so some systems require a return line plumbed in. I currently fly with a purge valve but is that really needed? I would love to have a lot of HP but I don't feel the need to spend $5000 plus extra for 20 hp. I want to ensure the setup can handle mogas... I worry the EPA will win out and rid us of 100LL. This means I want to avoid higher compression pistons right? I will be going with dual PMags. Why doesn't Lycoming offer options on the experimental engine line? I will also go constant speed although I don't like the extra cost I am currently spoiled and don't want to go back.

So next you have to choose a manufacturer. Where is the complete list of engine builders? Where is the engine buying guide? There are some great reviews from people on this site but what does that really mean? Does it mean personal support during setup and break in? Does it mean they have a great warranty and will take care of you? How would they do that exactly? All these companies are FAR from me meaning the engine will have to be shipped to them for service. Doesn't sound all that feasible to me. So does that great warranty really hold value?

After you get all those decisions made....you start all over with prop choice. Ugh! Venting over....for now!
__________________
My ATC opinion is NOT an official FAA recognized opinion, so any advice you get from me is ONLY my opinion.

Track my RV7A!!

Bought my flying -7A
Building an -8! (Fuse)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-22-2013, 07:54 PM
hydroguy2's Avatar
hydroguy2 hydroguy2 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Townsend, Montana
Posts: 3,179
Default

Grab a piece of paper and first list what you want. At the top of the list put your budget. I think most of us went through this same torture.

If all out horsepower isn't a must(or doesn't fit in the budget) Start with a 180hp 360 build up. This means parallel valves. Stock compression, but up to 9:1 will be okay with mogas. Fuel injection is your choice, happy campers with most systems. I like my AFP. Cold sump adds a bit of power and also complexity.

Send your wish list to several of the big shops.....Aerosport, Barrett, Eagle engines, etc. You'll see the prices are close, but each has something to offer different than the others.

Finally, for ease of build you could just select a M1B Lyco from Vans and sell the mags and install Pmags.

Same choice for the prop...What do you want and what do you want to spend.
__________________
Retired Dam guy. Life is good.
Brian, N155BKsold but bought back.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-22-2013, 08:09 PM
David Paule David Paule is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 4,428
Default

Especially with the prop, there's another variable and that's weight. Just something to bear in mind.

Dave
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-22-2013, 08:34 PM
ArVeeNiner's Avatar
ArVeeNiner ArVeeNiner is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,125
Default App?

Isn't there an app for that?
__________________
Kelly Johnson
San Jose, CA
RV-9A

Pink slip issued: 5/7/12

First flight: 5/28/12, Memorial Day.

Phase I Complete: 8/18/12!

2020 donation: complete
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-23-2013, 05:23 AM
Louise Hose's Avatar
Louise Hose Louise Hose is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Dayton, Nevada --- A34
Posts: 1,464
Default Try Kitplanes

Quote:
Originally Posted by tkatc View Post
So next you have to choose a manufacturer. Where is the complete list of engine builders? Where is the engine buying guide? :
Kitplanes magazine publish such a guide each year. I think it was in March or April this year. Also, the website has a searchable website.
__________________
Louise Hose, Editor of The Homebuilder's Portal by KITPLANES
RV3B, NX13PL "Tsamsiyu" co-builder, TMXIO-320, test platform Legacy G3X/TruTrak avionics suite
RV-6 ?Mikey? (purchased flying) ? Garmin test platform (G3X Touch, GS28 autopilot servos, GTN650 GPS/Nav/Comm,
GNC255 Nav/Com, GA240 audio panel)
RV8, N188PD "Valkyrie" (by marriage)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-23-2013, 05:34 AM
SmilingJack's Avatar
SmilingJack SmilingJack is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Hilton Head Island
Posts: 1,087
Default

TK,

I thinking the same as others. IO360/180HP.

I'm not sure you need the extra weight and HP.

Working it backwards a little - you said you NEED a C/S prop. Just go with the Hartzell Blended Airfoil. If you go composite you will spend double

Of course, I nice composite 3 blade would look cool
__________________
John Mastro
RV-8
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-23-2013, 07:02 AM
turbo's Avatar
turbo turbo is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Stuart, FL /Hartford, CT/Virgin Gorda,BVI
Posts: 3,122
Default

When I bought my last engine in 07 I added the flowed head option. I can lean it till it stops and never feel any roughness. I like it. Another thing to think about. this is a lycoming thunderbolt, old school, carbed, mags.
__________________
TURBO YES =VAF= Payed Jan2019
Ed D'Arcy
RV6-A 5,200+ hrs, R-44 1,600 hrs, Helicycle 320 hrs, gyro sold,35,000 miles flown in 2015
Stuart, Fl / S WINDSOR,Ct / Virgin Gorda, BVI - under major repair from hurricane damage
VAF #840 EAA AOPA FAC FABA QB SPA
addicted pickle ball player
https://i.postimg.cc/tn3h4svg/IMG-3101.jpg

Last edited by turbo : 07-23-2013 at 07:48 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-23-2013, 07:06 AM
ColoRv's Avatar
ColoRv ColoRv is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Tampa (BKV)
Posts: 926
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmilingJack View Post
TK,

I thinking the same as others. IO360/180HP.

I'm not sure you need the extra weight and HP.

Working it backwards a little - you said you NEED a C/S prop. Just go with the Hartzell Blended Airfoil. If you go composite you will spend double

Of course, I nice composite 3 blade would look cool
The delta between whirlwind and hartzel was nowhere near double on my calculator. YMMV
__________________
RV-8 Flying
1,235th flying RV8
SARL Race#95
SnF Homebuilt Judge

2015 Sun n Fun Kit Built Reserve Grand Champion
2015 Oshkosh Kit Built Champion
2015 Jeffco Kit Built Grand Champion
2014 Oshkosh Outstanding Workmanship Award

Broken Warrior of the Jarhead Clan
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-23-2013, 07:12 AM
BillL BillL is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Central IL
Posts: 5,515
Default

I did the same dance about 18 months ago and spent a lot of time investigating.

I spent decades in the engine design world for heavy diesel engines and even spent a couple of years at Contintenal , but my head was spinning with the options for this Lyc engine.

$ per HP led me to the 180 hp.
-warranty and total cost, led me to Vans. (financial crash dried up many options at the time)
-Show discount sealed the deal after getting some quotes.
- investigation of efficiency, leads to the Hartzell blended airfoil. I chose composite for reduced weight, knowing what i do now, probably should have saved the money.
-AWI 4 into 1exhaust for future potential of shrinking the exit area. (like DanH, only for a 7)
-IO just cause I wanted it, and did not have to have carb heat. Not a good reason, so for $, carbs are great.

I might go with electronic ignition later, but sticking with mags for now. I will break it in first. Advanced timing pushes more heat into the pistons and this engine does not have cooling jets. (thinking too much again)

I met and talked to some great people, the Barretts' are tops, although I did not go that way. Extremely knowledgable and nice people.

YMMV Happy decision making.
__________________
Bill

RV-7
Lord Kelvin:
“I often say that when you can measure what you are speaking about,
and express it in numbers, you know something about it; but when you
cannot measure it, when you cannot express it in numbers, your knowledge
is of a meager and unsatisfactory kind.”
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:02 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.