Home > VansAirForceForums

-Advertise in here!
- Today's Posts | Insert Pics

Keep VAF Going
w/a Donation

VAF on Twitter:

Old 05-02-2023, 11:32 AM
David Paule David Paule is offline
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 5,702

When casual sailors want to go faster, they buy a bicycle.

Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2023, 03:36 PM
RV8JD's Avatar
RV8JD RV8JD is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 892

Originally Posted by rgmwa View Post
Are those range values right? The 912iS is a lot more fuel efficient than the ULS. The POH says 493/368 nm and 547/440 nm for the iS/ULS respectively.
That question came up awhile back in the RV-12 forum. IIRC, 'rvbuilder2002' (Scott M.) addressed it and explained it. Maybe he or an RV-12 folk can point us to the post with the explanation.

EDIT: This is the thread that discusses the range numbers:
Carl N.

Last edited by RV8JD : 05-02-2023 at 04:40 PM.
Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2023, 10:49 PM
rgmwa rgmwa is offline
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 1,751

Yes, I recall that thread. What I was querying was the figures in post #68 that show very little difference in range in between the iS and ULS. That doesn't look right. Maybe a typo?
RV-12LR 912ULS 120346
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:45 PM.

The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.