VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

-POSTING RULES
-Advertise in here!
- Today's Posts | Insert Pics

Keep VAF Going
w/a Donation






VAF on Twitter:
@VansAirForceNet

  #11  
Old 03-20-2023, 11:50 AM
Plummit's Avatar
Plummit Plummit is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,723
Default

It has to do with the type of primer used...

-Marc
__________________
RV-10
N814RV
2023 Donation Made
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-20-2023, 12:16 PM
Blw2 Blw2 is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: Saint Johns, FL
Posts: 135
Default

yeah, no....I feel like it's not yet into the folly territory at all.

MPH indication in vintage aircraft...sure. I've got many hours flying those. That used to be common of course....but those aircraft were firmly already vintage when I learned to fly back in the 1990's!!!
I always HATED flying those aircraft only for that reason. Otherwise they were great!

Other than situation where the operating limitations are all published in MPH (such as those vintage aircraft)...but even this seems like a weak reason to me...

or when the instrumentation is calibrated that way so your hand is forced

I can't imagine why anyone in modern aviation would choose to fly in statute miles
winds and pretty much all navigation are based on nautical. ATC works in nautical

oh, looking again I now see that they publish mph for all their aircraft. I was thinking before it was just the 12, for some reason and thought it might have something to do with the LSA regulations. Now I'm even more perplexed!

Why Vans? just why?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-20-2023, 12:18 PM
JonJay's Avatar
JonJay JonJay is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Battleground
Posts: 4,493
Default

Someone should ask Van.

Here's my WAG -

WWII Army aircraft used MPH. Navy used Knots.(there is some debate even within those circles, but this is thought)

Ray Stits was an Army Mechanic during the War. It is likely he used MPH in the Playboy. Van was an Airforce Signal man, post war. Although Van could have used whatever he wanted in the Playboy conversion, he chose MPH in the RV1 and that is what it had when I flew it.

So, my guess is, it is what Van was used to and that stuck from the RV1 on forward. ( although I am sure Van was equally proficient in pilotage either way)
__________________
Smart People do Stupid things all the time. I know, I've seen me do'em.

RV6 - Builder/Flying
Bucker Jungmann
Fiat G.46 -(restoration in progress, if I have enough life left in me)
RV1 - Proud Pilot.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-20-2023, 12:20 PM
gasman gasman is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sonoma County
Posts: 4,958
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Desert Rat View Post
The irony in this statement is that 200 mph is about 170 kts, not 160
The irony of THIS statement is it is actually (rounded off) 174 kts. not 170...
__________________
VAF #897 Warren Moretti
2022 =VAF= Dues PAID
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-20-2023, 12:22 PM
RV8JD's Avatar
RV8JD RV8JD is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 892
Default

Van's started producing kits in the mid 1970's. At that time MPH was pretty much the standard for GA airplanes. And apparently they just stuck with it. But use what you want. And the conversion between the two is not difficult.

Van's aircraft timeline:

__________________
Carl N.
RV-8
KAWO

Last edited by RV8JD : 03-20-2023 at 12:26 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-20-2023, 12:32 PM
David Paule David Paule is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 5,702
Default

Flying VFR and generally not in the ATC system, I can use whatever. Since my flying experience dates back to the '60s and my other airplane uses mph, my RV-3B will too.

My sailboat uses knots. You would be surprised how many it takes to hold that thing together.

Dave
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-20-2023, 12:35 PM
JonJay's Avatar
JonJay JonJay is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Battleground
Posts: 4,493
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blw2 View Post
yeah, no....I feel like it's not yet into the folly territory at all.

MPH indication in vintage aircraft...sure. I've got many hours flying those. That used to be common of course....but those aircraft were firmly already vintage when I learned to fly back in the 1990's!!!
I always HATED flying those aircraft only for that reason. Otherwise they were great!

Other than situation where the operating limitations are all published in MPH (such as those vintage aircraft)...but even this seems like a weak reason to me...

or when the instrumentation is calibrated that way so your hand is forced

I can't imagine why anyone in modern aviation would choose to fly in statute miles
winds and pretty much all navigation are based on nautical. ATC works in nautical

oh, looking again I now see that they publish mph for all their aircraft. I was thinking before it was just the 12, for some reason and thought it might have something to do with the LSA regulations. Now I'm even more perplexed!

Why Vans? just why?
My Bucker is in "Klicks" (KPH). Try that on for size.
I have a conversion table glued near the instrument panel. I can do most of it in my head, (close enough) but it comes in handy at times.
KPH, KTS, MPH chart with about 10 different airspeeds.
__________________
Smart People do Stupid things all the time. I know, I've seen me do'em.

RV6 - Builder/Flying
Bucker Jungmann
Fiat G.46 -(restoration in progress, if I have enough life left in me)
RV1 - Proud Pilot.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 03-20-2023, 12:40 PM
Pat Falley Pat Falley is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Encinitas, CA
Posts: 48
Default

A nautical mile is used for navigation because it is 1/60 degree of latitude. For anyone else still using sectionals, any vertical line of longitude will have mile tick marks that are to scale. It makes it easy to find distance quickly when flying, (but in nautical miles).
__________________
Patrick Falley
RV-4, 582M - bought 9/01 - sold 8/20
RV-6, 524JN - bought 8/20
SNJ-5C, 665C - 22 yr ground up restoration.
YAK-50, 50BY - rebuilding
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 03-20-2023, 01:09 PM
Mel's Avatar
Mel Mel is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dallas area
Posts: 11,758
Default

I fly from the left side and have everything set up in knots. My Wife flies from the right seat and has her side set up in MPH.

She goes faster than I do but has farther to go, so we both get there about the same time!
__________________
Mel Asberry, DAR since the last century. Over 1,100 certifications accomplished. Discount for Veterans, Law Enforcement, Fire Fighters.
EAA Flight Advisor/Tech Counselor, Friend of the RV-1, Lifetime EAA.
Recipient of EAA Tony Bingelis Award and Wright Brothers Master Pilot Award
USAF Vet, High School E-LSA Project Mentor.
RV-6 Flying since 1993 (sold)
<rvmel(at)icloud.com>
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 03-20-2023, 01:10 PM
Snowflake's Avatar
Snowflake Snowflake is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Sidney, BC, Canada
Posts: 4,486
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rolivi View Post
200 MPH sounds faster...
This is the real answer. But also, given the majority of the market is in the US, and most of those people understand what mph are because they drive their cars around in it.
__________________
Rob Prior
1996 RV-6 "Tweety" C-FRBP (formerly N196RV)
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:56 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.