VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

-POSTING RULES
-Advertise in here!
- Today's Posts | Insert Pics

Keep VAF Going
Donate methods

Point your
camera app here
to donate fast.


Go Back   VAF Forums > Model Specific > RV-10
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-09-2020, 07:17 AM
bgrandorff bgrandorff is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 82
Default Slow Build Time - Which is quicker wings or fuselage?

With the quick build kits 7 months - 12 months out (just in talking with Vans on the phone), I'd like to use that wait time to work on a kit.

With that in mind, which tends to take longer, wings or fuselage? Just what's included with the kit, meaning fuselage minus the electronics, interior and so on.

I'd like to order one or the other and then work on it for those 5+ months in difference.

Hope this isn't too loaded of a question. My guess is wings would take less but it's been years since I've studied this.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-09-2020, 08:10 AM
jeffw@sc47's Avatar
jeffw@sc47 jeffw@sc47 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Simpsonville, SC (SC47)
Posts: 364
Default RV14A-Wings vs Fuselage

Wings, slow-build; took me about one year at a reasonable pace, 10-15 hrs / week, mostly by myself except for bottom skins needed help to buck rivets.

Fuselage, quick-build; took about 120 hrs to substantially finish up. I was hearing that the fuselage slow-build was taking other builders between 1200 to 1800 hours, for me that would be close to two years - so went quick build fuselage.
__________________
Jeff Warren
Simpsonville, SC (@SC47 > 10nm NW Triple Tree)
1946 Bellanca Cruisair 14-13-2 (74 YRS OLD 8/1/20)
RV14A (N14ZT), Ser#140195, Start 10/11/14
Contribution made 12/2/20 (USArmy 2/67-2/70)
www.mykitlog.com/jeffw@sc47
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-09-2020, 09:05 AM
UnPossible's Avatar
UnPossible UnPossible is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Granbury, TX
Posts: 547
Default

I know everyone works at a different speed, but I received my slow build fuselage in October and I had it to quick build stage by mid-February. I don't keep track of my hours, but it seemed to go together pretty quickly.
__________________
Jason Tremble
RV-7A (Flying and Sold)
RV-10 in process (@#$$%# Cabin Top & Doors)
Paid for 2020
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-09-2020, 09:13 AM
wirejock's Avatar
wirejock wirejock is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Estes Park, CO
Posts: 4,205
Default Wijgs

The wings go fasted to QB stage. Fuse to QB stage doesn't take much longer. It's the other stuff that slows the project. Finishing kit canopy!
__________________
Larry Larson
Estes Park, CO
http://wirejockrv7a.blogspot.com
wirejock at yahoo dot com
Donated 01/01/2021, plus a little extra.
RV-7A #73391, N511RV reserved (2,000+ hours)
HS SB, empennage, tanks, wings, fuse, working finishing kit
Disclaimer
I cannot be, nor will I be, held responsible if you try to do the same things I do and it does not work and/or causes you loss, injury, or even death in the process.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-09-2020, 12:41 PM
gfb gfb is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 734
Default

Can't talk to speed but I found the fuse much more enjoyable to build than the wings. If I were to pick one QB kit I'd buy the QB wings and have fun building a SB fuse while I waited.
__________________
---
RV-9A - started 01/2015, completed 07/19/2018, 500hrs 03/14/2020
RV-10 - started 04/2020
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-09-2020, 01:18 PM
tims88 tims88 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Arvada, CO
Posts: 104
Default

I haven't started my fuselage yet so I can't compare the time for both with any personal experience, but if I were to build another one I would seriously consider quick build wings. I'm building both of the wings at the same time and building each component twice is extremely tedious. Plus, once I finish a component for one wing my excitement really drops off when it's time to go finish the same component for the other wing so a lot of the time the second one actually takes me longer than the first.
__________________
Tim
Arvada, CO
RV-10 In Progress
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-09-2020, 02:04 PM
leok leok is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Clarkston, MI
Posts: 403
Default QB wings

I did both fuselage and wings slow build. I am not sure of the time differential to QB stage, but can absolutely state that I if I were to choose one or the other for QB it would be the wings. In fact I would wait on ordering the QB wings until later in the project as the vast majority of build time is in the fuselage. As mentioned in my Kitlog I saved the wings until last excepting FWF. That way I did not have a $10K bill hanging from the wall as I completed the balance of the aircraft systems.

I found the fuselage and the many systems that had to be installed by far and away the most fun of the build.
__________________
Building started Oct 5th 2014, Flying since 1/16/2020
http://www.mykitlog.com/leok
RV Hotel, come by and visit if you're in town
Dues paid 2020
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-09-2020, 02:11 PM
BrianDC's Avatar
BrianDC BrianDC is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 279
Default

Recommend wings for the quick build. Fuse was much more fun as each step was new. Wings just sucked the fun out of the build as it was a lot of repetition.
__________________
Brian Lester
Dues Paid - 2020
RV10 Slow Build - #41778
Finish Kit - in progress
RV10builder.com
KVKX / KHEF
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-09-2020, 02:44 PM
jacoby jacoby is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: WNC
Posts: 290
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianDC View Post
Recommend wings for the quick build. Fuse was much more fun as each step was new. Wings just sucked the fun out of the build as it was a lot of repetition.
Currently on wings. Agree 100%. Wings are like building the horizontal stabilizer.. except bigger. Like deburring ribs? do it 30 times! Like countersinking? You get to do it 800+ times in the spar! Like cutting stiffeners out of stock? You get to do it 30ish times for the ailerons alone! Oh and you get the fun of trying to decipher the aileron SB and how it fits into the existing plans (don't forgot those countersinks.. i sure did!).

And the fuel tank instructions are incomplete AND incorrect, which makes things even more "fun".
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-09-2020, 07:54 PM
bpattonsoa bpattonsoa is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Indepenence, Oregon
Posts: 359
Default

I did the slow fuselage and quick wings, perhaps for different reasons.

The wings are boring, period. Plus the infamous tank sealant that will destroy at least several pants and shirts. One set of tanks in my non prepunched -6 was more than enough. (If you do make the mistake and build tanks, look up the sticky thread on the building tips forum)

The fuselage is fun, something different every day. You won?t get tired of dimpling huge skins, and you will be amazed to watch it grow from a (big) pile of parts into a wonder in the home builder world.
__________________
Bruce Patton
Rans S-20 Raven 796S flying since 2019 (slowly)
RV-6A 596S flying since '89 (Sold)
HP-18 5596S flying since '83
RV-10 996S flying since 2014, quick build wing and slow build fues., - dual Skyviews with complete system, two radio and not much else. Interior completely finished with Zolatone. CF plenum. 1624 lbs, FLYING after a 21.5 month build.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:37 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.