VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

-POSTING RULES
-Advertise in here!
- Today's Posts | Insert Pics

Keep VAF Going
Donate methods

Point your
camera app here
to donate fast.


Go Back   VAF Forums > Model Specific > RV-14
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-17-2021, 03:02 PM
Bernie Bernie is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Mountain Green. UT
Posts: 7
Default RV-14 Wt & Balance as affect by engine and prop choice

As my research on propellers for the IO-390-EXP119 for a tailwheel RV-14 progresses, another question has surfaced. The EXP119 is supposedly 10 lbs lighter that the stock 390. One propeller option is the new Whirlwind 300 72" 3 bladed carbon fiber prop which weighs in at 36 lbs (10 lbs or so lighter than the Hartzell 72" blended airfoil prop). Overall aircraft weight loss is generally a good thing. But is a weight loss of 20 or so lbs from the nose going to help or hinder the overall weight and balance decisions about where to install certain components? Again thoughts and comments from those ins the know would be appreciated.

Thanks, Bernie

RV-14, 140587, N914BF reserved, building for 2 years
RV-4, SN3630, modified for my 6'7" frame, flying since 5/2020
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-17-2021, 03:42 PM
MED MED is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Aiken, SC
Posts: 759
Default

I have the “old” I0390 Thunderbolt engine, the Hartzell 2-blade composite prop, and a B&C stand-by alternator in my RV-14A. With full fuel and just me aboard, I am just behind the forward cg limit. Losing 10 pounds on the nose would be a good thing for me. Might not be so good for the 14 taildragger.
__________________
MED
140236
N435MD
Miss March 2020
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-17-2021, 04:31 PM
Av8rRob's Avatar
Av8rRob Av8rRob is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Rescue, CA. KROB
Posts: 387
Default

I agree that prop weight is a real concern for a taildragger if you want maximum usability with pax and cargo loads. Personally if I had a new exp 119 engine I would stick with the heavy prop.
__________________
Rob Lasater
Rv-14 flying baby, yeah.
Paid Dec 2020
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:37 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.