Arie
Well Known Member
Good day all,
I posted this under general discussion ,and not under model spesific as I think this relates to most RV models. I have read here about the rivets that attach the baffle to the skin have a tendancy to sometimes set a bit skew, I think it might be that, when the skin gets countersink with the baffle in place during initial asselbly ,the holes in the skin might enlarge slightly ,as the skin is only .032in thick and cause some allignment problems when the baffle is then finally installed.
My plan with the rear baffle on the tanks is not to countersink the fuel tank skin before the baffle is finally installed and prosealed and then 100% clecod in place. The assembly would then be left for a few days to cure. After the proseal has set only then remove every second cleco, countersink and rivet in place and then repeat the process for the remaining clecos still left over.
What do you guys think of this idea? Good ,or a waste of time ,causing some other problems.
Regards
Arie
I posted this under general discussion ,and not under model spesific as I think this relates to most RV models. I have read here about the rivets that attach the baffle to the skin have a tendancy to sometimes set a bit skew, I think it might be that, when the skin gets countersink with the baffle in place during initial asselbly ,the holes in the skin might enlarge slightly ,as the skin is only .032in thick and cause some allignment problems when the baffle is then finally installed.
My plan with the rear baffle on the tanks is not to countersink the fuel tank skin before the baffle is finally installed and prosealed and then 100% clecod in place. The assembly would then be left for a few days to cure. After the proseal has set only then remove every second cleco, countersink and rivet in place and then repeat the process for the remaining clecos still left over.
What do you guys think of this idea? Good ,or a waste of time ,causing some other problems.
Regards
Arie