-POSTING RULES

-Advertise in here!
-
Today's Posts
|
Insert Pics
Keep VAF
Going
Donate methods

Point your
camera app here
to donate fast.
|

01-08-2021, 11:30 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Cement City
Posts: 48
|
|
Panel changes
So while waiting on tools, workshop setup etc. I've been screwing around in Solidworks. Is the panel a structural component? can you change the shape of it? This is what I've been thinking of.
|

01-08-2021, 02:51 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 929
|
|
Panel Changes
No, the panel is not "structural" in that the airplane flight loads are not carried through/by it. I categorize aircraft structure as "primary" and "secondary", and I would say the panel is a secondary structure. It carries the weight of the avionics attached to it.
So as far as the changes you illustrate in your Solidworks model, I would say it would be OK. However, you appear to have the support ribs from the firewall for the slider canopy, and these are structural. So be careful where you put your avionics in the panel so you don't have to compromise (ie. cut and then have to reinforce) the ribs.
Also, the panel is not very wide, and angling the avionics toward the pilot may not be necessary. It's easy in Solidworks to forget the actual size of things. I plotted mine out on an E size drawing full size and then got a blueprint shop to plot it full size. In my case, I fastened it to the actual panel in the fuselage and tried out the ergonomics from the pilot seat. If you're not that far along, you can still do a quick physical mockup to check the switch throws, radio buttons etc.
__________________
Terry Edwards
RV-9A (Fuselage)
2020/2021 VAF Contribution Sent
|

01-09-2021, 11:18 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Stoughton, WI
Posts: 483
|
|
No need to angle items in center of panel
The center of the panel is less than 12" offset from the center of the pilot seat and does not pose a view limitation for the pilot. My avionics stack center is offset from the center of the panel 4" to the right and has posed no problem viewing or reaching the far side controls on a panel mounted 296 in 11 years of flying. I plan to install a GPS 175 at the top of the stack in place of the 296 and it easily meets Garmin angle of view. IMHO you are adding a lot of unnecessary work trying to angle the radio stack. I suggest you sit in an RV to get a feel for reach and view before committing.
__________________
Frank Smidler
N96FS, RV-6
Flying 1/11/09
1085 hr
2WI6 Stoughton, WI
Formally of Lafayette, IN
|

01-09-2021, 08:28 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Cement City
Posts: 48
|
|
Thanks for the input, it is hard to judge size looking at a computer screen.
|

01-12-2021, 01:29 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: fort myers fl
Posts: 1,010
|
|
the question of the panel being structural can only be answered by vans. I do know that the RV-4 panel is considered structural because it contributes to the stiffness of the longerons and the forward boot cowl.
|

01-12-2021, 02:17 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Estes Park, CO
Posts: 4,310
|
|
Panel
I asked Vans. On my 7, they said it was structural. I kept it stock.
That said, there's a lot of folks with multi part panels so might want to ask about your specific solution.
__________________
Larry Larson
Estes Park, CO
http://wirejockrv7a.blogspot.com
wirejock at yahoo dot com
Donated 01/01/2021, plus a little extra.
RV-7A #73391, N511RV reserved (2,000+ hours)
HS SB, empennage, tanks, wings, fuse, working finishing kit
Disclaimer
I cannot be, nor will I be, held responsible if you try to do the same things I do and it does not work and/or causes you loss, injury, or even death in the process.
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:48 AM.
|