I have been having high fuel flows on my RV-12 during the first 25 hours. They have been 6.2 gph at 5000 rpm economy cruise, and up to 8.2 gpm at takeoff climb power. To get 5.5 gph I would have to cut back to 4400 rpm or so.
So today I changed my oil and my sparkplugs are uniformly dark, just like a moderately rich engine. Both sides were the same color, so the carb balance was not the problem.
Today after seeing that 8.2 gpm (and yes, my flowscan is calibrated pretty well) I asked my CFI/A&P what could be wrong. We started thinking the gas level in the carbs could be high from too much fuel pressure, it would act like heavy floats because it would take more pressure (higher gas level= richer main jet) to seat the needle against high pressure, where a low pressure fuel system would cause a lower (Rotax normal)fuel level in the carb.
Then I remembered I flew a Tecnam Sierra in which you used a electric pump for takeoff. ( and landing) Then the rich mixture is good detonation insurance as well as mechanical pump failure insurance.
So I got back in, climbed to altitude, and pulled the fuse. Fuel consumption went to zero while it ran off the excess level of gas in the bowls, and then it stabilized at normal Rotax fuel flows.
When I put the fuse back in, the flow went to 10gph, alarms sounded for a bit, while it filled the carbs up to the artificially high level.
I tried it back and forth several times, same results.
Does the Rotax factory test engines with the mechanical fuel pump?
I think Larry Geiger had a good idea with the switch.
Please correct me if I am wrong about a technical detail above.
Ken at Vans said the Rotax bulletin didn't cover our engine S/N but it would seem to be physics.
My fuel pressure is 2.7 psi with the mechanical pump and 6 or so with both.
John
So today I changed my oil and my sparkplugs are uniformly dark, just like a moderately rich engine. Both sides were the same color, so the carb balance was not the problem.
Today after seeing that 8.2 gpm (and yes, my flowscan is calibrated pretty well) I asked my CFI/A&P what could be wrong. We started thinking the gas level in the carbs could be high from too much fuel pressure, it would act like heavy floats because it would take more pressure (higher gas level= richer main jet) to seat the needle against high pressure, where a low pressure fuel system would cause a lower (Rotax normal)fuel level in the carb.
Then I remembered I flew a Tecnam Sierra in which you used a electric pump for takeoff. ( and landing) Then the rich mixture is good detonation insurance as well as mechanical pump failure insurance.
So I got back in, climbed to altitude, and pulled the fuse. Fuel consumption went to zero while it ran off the excess level of gas in the bowls, and then it stabilized at normal Rotax fuel flows.
When I put the fuse back in, the flow went to 10gph, alarms sounded for a bit, while it filled the carbs up to the artificially high level.
I tried it back and forth several times, same results.
Does the Rotax factory test engines with the mechanical fuel pump?
I think Larry Geiger had a good idea with the switch.
Please correct me if I am wrong about a technical detail above.
Ken at Vans said the Rotax bulletin didn't cover our engine S/N but it would seem to be physics.
My fuel pressure is 2.7 psi with the mechanical pump and 6 or so with both.
John