2 sides of the fence...
In most every subject there's 2 sides of the fence.
The 'A' model nosegear is no exception.
First off, I haven't read any post that is asking for a mandatory nosegear correction for existing/future 'A' models.
What I have heard is a recognition of repetitve accidents that could be lessened if corrective action opportunities are executed. Some of this is design, some of this is pilot technique, some of it may be presently unknown.
In any case, nobody has suggested that anyone be mandated into modifying their 'A' model if they choose not to.
The reason that the nosegear conversation keeps surfacing is the lack of options to improve the situation. Sure, we can improve our technique and avoid any grass strip if we choose to. However, the nosegear design request is a message to VANs that there are many pilots that love the 'A' model AND want to utilize grass strips in a SAFE reliable manner.
Slider/Tipup, Taildragger/Nosedragger, 150HP/180HP... Vans RVs has always been about options directed to the desires of pilots.. ALL P-I-L-O-T-S.. So, how is requesting a turf-friendly reliable nosewheel as an 'option' perceived as an infringement on 'A' models owners that choose not to modify?
I'll even concede that most of the 'A' pilots that are not concerned with the frequency of nosewheel failures 'may' execute better landing/TO techniques. But, that should not defer the opportunity to improve the nosegear for the remaining pilots. Simply put, accidents DO happen. If not, we would still be driving cars with solid bumpers (minus airbags and restraint systems)
We still have accidents however, the survivability rate has greatly improved.
Improvement requires change, otherwise expect the same results.
Finally, as we review the accident events (and comments from the pilots that DID experience a nosegear collapse) there was one comment that sticks in my mind. "I never had a problem before, and it happened so fast"
Amazing how a pilot's perspective changes when he finds himself inverted on the runway". Those shoulda/coulda/woulda-s come back full circle.
So, for the 'A' model lovers that also desire safe grass strip access. Don't concede into a taildragger (unless you really want it). Keep talking about the nosegear failure trends, and any suggestions that may improve it. Repetition exposure of the problem WILL eventually evolve a solution.
For 'A' model owners that are satisfied with the nosegear as-is. We respect your opinion and are very happy for you. If the on-going discussion of designing a nosegear option offends you, we deeply apologize and respectively remind you that you have the option to skip this subject by the power of your left index finger.
(Are they gone yet?..
)
Now, let's get back to the improvement process..
Anyone took a closer look at the RV10 nosegear. Wonder how much performance reduction it generates compared to the others.
(VANs definately beefed it up to handle more load in comparison).
Just a thought...