VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

-POSTING RULES
-Advertise in here!
- Today's Posts | Insert Pics

Keep VAF Going
Donate methods

Point your
camera app here
to donate fast.

  #11  
Old 02-09-2022, 11:42 AM
M5fly's Avatar
M5fly M5fly is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 300
Default

Following along!
__________________
Cole Melby
RV-6A bought flying, sold
RV-10 dreamer
Exemption waived, 2022 donation made
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-04-2022, 10:57 AM
Flandy10 Flandy10 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Fayetteville, GA
Posts: 161
Default TDI Update

For those that are interested.....

Here are some initial performance numbers from a flight a few days ago.

They are Max Continuous power (230HP =12.5gph), recommend cruise (185HP=10.0gph) and econ cruise(150HP=8.2gph). FF is (as I said before) difficult to read with a turbine meter system due to the engine lift pump is a mechanical piston pump pulling fuel at 66gph in flight. So these FF numbers were calculated using the factory information. I did develop a system that will read it pretty accurately but the computer that translates Marine language to Garmin has a problem right now. I'm not sure if it is worth the complexity and weight because fuel flow on this type engine is a fixed number related to the high pressure pump rack position.

The following was recorded from the GTN650 while flying on autopilot and letting speed stabilize for several minutes at each altitude/power setting. GW about 2600# on this flight

5000ft. Max 169Ktas Rec 160Ktas Econ 145Ktas
7500ft. Max 176Ktas Rec 162Ktas Econ 147Ktas
10000ft. Max 180Ktas Rec 169Ktas Econ 150Ktas
12500ft. Max 184Ktas Rec 177Ktas Econ 158Ktas

Engine is rated at 230HP to 10000Ft and drops off to about 170HP at 20000Ft (its max certified altitude). I don't have an oxygen system yet, so anything higher will come later.
__________________
Scott Flandermeyer
Rv-10 TDI 372 hrs
Fayettevile, GA

2022 VAF Donation complete
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-04-2022, 12:17 PM
BTG1996 BTG1996 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 64
Default

Awesome project- very cool to see the bleeding edge stuff- thanks for posting!
__________________
RV12is #121441
Wing Kit received 7/11/22
Currently flying C-172M, 180hp Airplains
Dues paid 12/21
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-04-2022, 01:26 PM
1001001's Avatar
1001001 1001001 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Just Minutes from KBVI!
Posts: 1,418
Default

Very interesting to see this! I missed it when you first posted it. Keep the information flowing, please!
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-04-2022, 07:46 PM
rv6ejguy's Avatar
rv6ejguy rv6ejguy is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 6,327
Default

Thanks for posting these numbers Scott.
__________________

Ross Farnham, Calgary, Alberta
Turbo Subaru EJ22, SDS EFI, Marcotte M-300, IVO, Shorai- RV6A C-GVZX flying from CYBW since 2003- 460.7 hrs. on the Hobbs,
RV10 95% built- Sold 2016
http://www.sdsefi.com/aircraft.html
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCiy...g2GvQfelECCGoQ


Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-05-2022, 08:42 AM
Canadian_JOY Canadian_JOY is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 2,581
Default

I'm curious to learn about the "seat of the pants" experience. In the automotive world cars are rated on a scale for NVH - noise, vibration and harshness. How does this powerplant combination "feel" as compared to a typical Lycoming? How does it compare with respect to perceived noise and vibration levels? Are there any parts of the power band which just "feel" better?

When I look at those cruise numbers I'm thinking that's a lot of speed on not a lot of fuel. Yes, the RV10 is slippery to start with, but still, these numbers are compelling.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-05-2022, 09:01 AM
rv6ejguy's Avatar
rv6ejguy rv6ejguy is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 6,327
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Canadian_JOY View Post

When I look at those cruise numbers I'm thinking that's a lot of speed on not a lot of fuel. Yes, the RV10 is slippery to start with, but still, these numbers are compelling.
Looks like about 1 gph less than a 540 running LOP at similar altitudes/ speeds. The non-turbo 540 can't match the high altitude/ high power setting speeds of course.
__________________

Ross Farnham, Calgary, Alberta
Turbo Subaru EJ22, SDS EFI, Marcotte M-300, IVO, Shorai- RV6A C-GVZX flying from CYBW since 2003- 460.7 hrs. on the Hobbs,
RV10 95% built- Sold 2016
http://www.sdsefi.com/aircraft.html
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCiy...g2GvQfelECCGoQ


Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 03-05-2022, 06:54 PM
Flandy10 Flandy10 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Fayetteville, GA
Posts: 161
Default

First—-I haven’t spent any recent time in a four cylinder Lycoming or a six cylinder for that matter so…..

Initial idle can feel a little rough when the engine is cold at 800rpm (not terrible) and there is a band between 900 and 1000 that I avoid (only have 11 hrs on this one, but the TD 300 was similar), above that it seems pretty smooth to me. It runs at a constant 2200 rpm from takeoff till landing power reduction.

As for performance, the cowling I have is just what I was using with the TD300 and it was more oil temperature sensitive 235F in climb and around 205F in cruise. Both were with cowl flaps open year round. Initially, this one cools much better. Climb and cruise with cowl flaps closed is 195F and 185F. CHTs are not above 335F climb and 300F cruise with a 392F red line. So some aerodynamic improvements are in the works.
__________________
Scott Flandermeyer
Rv-10 TDI 372 hrs
Fayettevile, GA

2022 VAF Donation complete

Last edited by Flandy10 : 03-05-2022 at 09:51 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 03-05-2022, 07:09 PM
CamTom12 CamTom12 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Newport News, VA
Posts: 40
Default

Great job keeping the project alive!
__________________
Ruppe Racer
E-AB PA-22/20-160
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 03-05-2022, 09:59 PM
BobTurner BobTurner is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Livermore, CA
Posts: 8,432
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rv6ejguy View Post
Looks like about 1 gph less than a 540 running LOP at similar altitudes/ speeds. The non-turbo 540 can't match the high altitude/ high power setting speeds of course.
Remember that diesel fuel is about 10% heavier per gal, and has about 10% more energy per gal, than Avgas. Honestly, I thought it should do a little better than that.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:45 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.