VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

-POSTING RULES
-Advertise in here!
- Today's Posts | Insert Pics

Keep VAF Going
w/a Donation






VAF on Twitter:
@VansAirForceNet


Go Back   VAF Forums > Model Specific > RV-14
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-24-2018, 08:13 PM
iamtheari iamtheari is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: ND
Posts: 632
Default Control column installation and bearing stiffness (page 29-05 step 7)

I got the bottom fuselage skins riveted together tonight and proceeded to install the control column. There is almost no play when one side's hardware is installed so I do not think I need any shims. But when the hardware is torqued to spec, the bearings seem rather stiff. It moves smoothly without binding, but it resists movement and will easily hold itself in position against gravity. How freely should the control column move?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-24-2018, 08:51 PM
RV-14E's Avatar
RV-14E RV-14E is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Colorado
Posts: 172
Default

You may need to try different combinations of washers/shims to eliminate bearing load. I believe there ought not be a change in friction as you torque the nuts. Shim with care.

If it's any consolation, as I look at my time lapse from when I completed that task on 4-Jul-15, it took me 3 hours to find the right combination. I obtained very smooth movement in both axes with no noticeable friction. It was frustrating but worth the time invested. It's best to do this now when access is so easy.

Not everyone's will be the same as mine, however my ultimate washer stack ended up being two NAS1149F0363 on the left inboard and single 363 and 332 washers on the left outboard (top image). The right side had two 363 washers with a single F-14146A shim (sandwiched between the washers so it won't contact anything) on the outboard side and a single 363 with the same size shim on the inboard side (bottom image).



__________________
-E

http://rv-14a.blogspot.com/ Comprehensive build blog.

Go here for my free, public-domain, comprehensive GRT LOG and CSV flight data analysis program. Also swallows CSV files from Garmin, Dynon and AFS and GPX files from FlyQ EFT. Create complete and versatile graphs and Google Earth KMZ files based on your flight. And for GRT LOG files users, a near complete ADS-B picture.

My RV-14A's POH and checklists (condition inspection and flight) are here.

Last edited by RV-14E : 09-24-2018 at 08:58 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-25-2018, 07:41 AM
iamtheari iamtheari is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: ND
Posts: 632
Default

Thanks. I'll spend my weekend in that tedium, I guess, since it'll be worth it. My concern is that the bearings themselves are not working correctly but I don't know how to differentiate that from misalignment of the control column, nor how to fix them if they are sticking.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-25-2018, 07:57 AM
Tom Martin Tom Martin is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,614
Default

The RV 14 is a wonderful example of how new technology has improved the design, and quality of parts. I do have a concern about this particularly part of the airplane in terms of maintenance. If those bearings are ever to be replaced it is going to be a major job. The "bearing" holders are riveted to the fuselage and if I were to do it again I would use screws to fasten these parts to the airframe. This would allow you to easily remove those parts to replace the bearings. Airplanes can last a long time and 20 or 40 years down the road those bearings will need to be replaced.
__________________
Tom Martin RV1 pilot 4.6hours!
CPL & IFR rated
EVO F1 Rocket 1000 hours,
2010 SARL Rocket 100 race, average speed of 238.6 knots/274.6mph
RV4, RV7, RV10, two HRIIs and five F1 Rockets
RV14 Tail dragger

Fairlea Field
St.Thomas, Ontario Canada, CYQS
fairleafield@gmail.com
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-25-2018, 08:08 AM
iamtheari iamtheari is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: ND
Posts: 632
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Martin View Post
The RV 14 is a wonderful example of how new technology has improved the design, and quality of parts. I do have a concern about this particularly part of the airplane in terms of maintenance. If those bearings are ever to be replaced it is going to be a major job. The "bearing" holders are riveted to the fuselage and if I were to do it again I would use screws to fasten these parts to the airframe. This would allow you to easily remove those parts to replace the bearings. Airplanes can last a long time and 20 or 40 years down the road those bearings will need to be replaced.
I wonder if I would be better off drilling those rivets out and re-engineering the bearing bracket mounts now, before I install the side skins and age an additional 20-40 years. I'm 36 now and, if there's a tedious job that must be done, I'd rather do it now than in retirement.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-25-2018, 08:29 AM
kbalch's Avatar
kbalch kbalch is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Clermont, FL
Posts: 591
Default

As always, be careful with any reengineering, particularly of the "eyeball" type. If Van's hasn't OK'ed a change and you don't have the experience to do the math yourself, then any structural deviation from plans (including substituting screws for rivets) is a bad idea, even when it seems obvious that it'll work fine in a given situation.

Be aware, too, that any such deviation from plans is a likely focal point for future legal action by a new owner (even should you document and fully disclose all such deviations, which you're absolutely going to do, right?) or his estate's attorney.

I build with the intention of enjoying the plane (or car, bike, etc.) for a few years and then selling it and moving on to the next project. I couldn't possibly care less about maintenance issues 20-40 years down the road. Your mileage, of course, will very likely vary.
__________________
Ken

RV-8 N118KB (#81125) - Sold
RV-14A N114KB (#140494) - Sold

RV-14A.com
N114KB Build Site
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-25-2018, 08:40 AM
rvbuilder2002 rvbuilder2002 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Hubbard Oregon
Posts: 10,193
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by iamtheari View Post
I got the bottom fuselage skins riveted together tonight and proceeded to install the control column. There is almost no play when one side's hardware is installed so I do not think I need any shims. But when the hardware is torqued to spec, the bearings seem rather stiff. It moves smoothly without binding, but it resists movement and will easily hold itself in position against gravity. How freely should the control column move?
As freely as as it does when only one side is torqued up.

The fact that it tightens up is an indicator that you do need shims.

Any noticeable friction at his point in the system will have an influence on flight characteristics. Most notably... pitch stability, and the ability for the airplane to return to trimmed flight after even a slight upset.
__________________
Opinions, information, and comments, are my own unless stated otherwise.
You are personally responsible for determining the suitability of any tips, ideas, etc. obtained from any post I have made in this forum.


Scott McDaniels
Hubbard, Oregon
Formerly of Van's Aircraft Engineering Prototype Shop
FAA/DAR, A&P, EAA Technical Councelor
RV-6A (aka "Junkyard Special ")
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-25-2018, 08:44 AM
iamtheari iamtheari is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: ND
Posts: 632
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rvbuilder2002 View Post
As freely as as it does when only one side is torqued up.

The fact that it tightens up is an indicator that you do need shims.

Any noticeable friction at his point in the system will have an influence on flight characteristics. Most notably... pitch stability, and the ability for the airplane to return to trimmed flight after even a slight upset.
Thanks. I'll loosen one side at a time and see how that goes. I agree that any friction between my hand and the control surfaces would be best to avoid. My main concern is whether I somehow messed up the bearings themselves when sandwiching them into the bracket assemblies.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-25-2018, 08:46 AM
rvbuilder2002 rvbuilder2002 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Hubbard Oregon
Posts: 10,193
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Martin View Post
The RV 14 is a wonderful example of how new technology has improved the design, and quality of parts. I do have a concern about this particularly part of the airplane in terms of maintenance. If those bearings are ever to be replaced it is going to be a major job. The "bearing" holders are riveted to the fuselage and if I were to do it again I would use screws to fasten these parts to the airframe. This would allow you to easily remove those parts to replace the bearings. Airplanes can last a long time and 20 or 40 years down the road those bearings will need to be replaced.
I have been working on RV's for almost 30 years now (and work on the oldest side by side RV flying ) and have never had to replace one of these bearings.
If the control column is shimmed properly so that there is no side load on the bearing, and they are lubricated occasionally, they will last. That is the main reason that even though design effort is typically made to make things reasonably maintainable,maintainability was compromised in this instance because it is unheard of to have one of these bearings fail.
__________________
Opinions, information, and comments, are my own unless stated otherwise.
You are personally responsible for determining the suitability of any tips, ideas, etc. obtained from any post I have made in this forum.


Scott McDaniels
Hubbard, Oregon
Formerly of Van's Aircraft Engineering Prototype Shop
FAA/DAR, A&P, EAA Technical Councelor
RV-6A (aka "Junkyard Special ")
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-25-2018, 08:47 AM
rvbuilder2002 rvbuilder2002 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Hubbard Oregon
Posts: 10,193
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by iamtheari View Post
Thanks. I'll loosen one side at a time and see how that goes. I agree that any friction between my hand and the control surfaces would be best to avoid. My main concern is whether I somehow messed up the bearings themselves when sandwiching them into the bracket assemblies.
These bearings can tolerate no side load without there being a large increase on friction.
That is the reason for the emphases on using shims and it is likely the cause of your friction as well.
__________________
Opinions, information, and comments, are my own unless stated otherwise.
You are personally responsible for determining the suitability of any tips, ideas, etc. obtained from any post I have made in this forum.


Scott McDaniels
Hubbard, Oregon
Formerly of Van's Aircraft Engineering Prototype Shop
FAA/DAR, A&P, EAA Technical Councelor
RV-6A (aka "Junkyard Special ")
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:12 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.