VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics

  #11  
Old 06-03-2015, 11:40 AM
David Paule David Paule is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 4,428
Default

Would rounded entry shapes help, or nozzle shapes at the exit? After all, there's air moving through there.

Dave
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-03-2015, 11:54 AM
MarkW's Avatar
MarkW MarkW is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Edgewater, FL. KSFB
Posts: 1,116
Default

Great work Michael and I am surprised I am beating Dan to this comment.
I know it is more work but having cowl pressures before and after would help determine what is happening to overall mass flow.
__________________
Mark
RV9 - N14MW - Flying
G3X - ECI Titan I0-320
Catto three blade prop
http://www.mykitlog.com/MarkW
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-03-2015, 03:50 PM
BillL BillL is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Central IL
Posts: 5,514
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkW View Post
Great work Michael and I am surprised I am beating Dan to this comment.
I know it is more work but having cowl pressures before and after would help determine what is happening to overall mass flow.
Ya see - Dan has us trained!!

Nice work Michael, but as you know, higher pressure will force more air through remaining "leaks" like oil coolers, alternator and mag blast tubes. Do you have those and/or a plenum? Average rise = 10F, but drop was -27F. Balancing the airflows should reduce the rise to a drop and give extra speed too (lower mass flow).

It is good to be reminded (of the balance), though, as I was standing just yesterday looking at that area and wondering . . .

Looking forward to your progress, maybe round the edges of the risers as air won't just go straight down.
__________________
Bill

RV-7
Lord Kelvin:
“I often say that when you can measure what you are speaking about,
and express it in numbers, you know something about it; but when you
cannot measure it, when you cannot express it in numbers, your knowledge
is of a meager and unsatisfactory kind.”
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-03-2015, 06:54 PM
Toobuilder's Avatar
Toobuilder Toobuilder is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Mojave
Posts: 4,642
Default

I'm working with the asumption that most of the forward momentum of the incoming air (or is it better to say horizontal velocity?) is pretty low by the time it has made it past the front cylinders. I'm thinking most of the air in the upper cowl is essentially stagnant, but under ram pressure and looking for an easy way out. The rounded inlet I created by wrapping the pushrod tubes should be very inviting to air looking for an escape path. However, the shrouds do reduce volume quickly right down to fin height and remain that way for most of the circumference of the cylinder. Its this aspect that likely poses the most significant throttle to the system. With the heads retaining essentially the standard baffle configuration, the only other change is the fact that all other leaks were sealed - and that is always a good thing.

I believe that the cylinder wraps need more volume and yes, a better exit design.

Stay tuned!
__________________
WARNING! Incorrect design and/or fabrication of aircraft and/or components may result in injury or death. Information presented in this post is based on my own experience - Reader has sole responsibility for determining accuracy or suitability for use.

Michael Robinson
______________
Harmon Rocket II -SDS EFI
RV-8 - SDS CPI
1940 Taylorcraft BL-65
1984 L39C
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-04-2015, 07:37 PM
rfrost rfrost is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Hurricane, UT
Posts: 3
Default A useful? reference to optimal cooling design

This topic is timely for me, as I am working on improving the cooling on my 9A. I am currently reworking my plenum and haven't started on inter-cylinder baffles yet, but am very interested in your results. In reading about the issue, I came across the link below which references five NACA reports on engine cooling and also discusses what the author considers the high points. I found it his summary informative and thought you might also be interested.

Rick

http://x-jets.com/a_cooling_efficiency.html
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 06-04-2015, 08:18 PM
Toobuilder's Avatar
Toobuilder Toobuilder is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Mojave
Posts: 4,642
Default

Excellent!

Thanks for posting that info Rick... That has given me a few more pieces of the puzzle.

And if you do decide to stick with the stock intercylinder baffles, make sure you spend a pit of time tweaking them to seal better. A bit of bending, speed tape and RTV goes a long way towards plugging unwanted holes. Best to do this before the engine is hung.
__________________
WARNING! Incorrect design and/or fabrication of aircraft and/or components may result in injury or death. Information presented in this post is based on my own experience - Reader has sole responsibility for determining accuracy or suitability for use.

Michael Robinson
______________
Harmon Rocket II -SDS EFI
RV-8 - SDS CPI
1940 Taylorcraft BL-65
1984 L39C

Last edited by Toobuilder : 06-04-2015 at 08:22 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 06-04-2015, 08:31 PM
rfrost rfrost is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Hurricane, UT
Posts: 3
Default Glad you liked it!

Michael, Good advice about doing the intercylinder baffles before the engine is hung, but a little too late ... I'm just finishing up Phase 1.

Rick
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 06-07-2015, 05:30 PM
crabandy crabandy is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Ottawa, Ks
Posts: 2,188
Default

i'm at the point of piddling some more with my baffling as well. I put new lycoming nitrided steel cylinders on just over 10 hours ago. Oil consumption seems to have stabilized and I seem to run about 20-30 degrees hotter than my previous chrome cylinders that the rings never seated on.
When I put the new cylinders on I also added some silicone baffle wraps A-La-DanH. I think at this point the higher temps have more to do with the baffle wrap than the newer cylinders.

The wrap between cylinders 1/3...


The wrap on the front of 1...


I wondered if the square edges of the baffle wrap to fins cause some turbulence inhibiting air from entering the fins as well as less volume (140* top side exposure per Rick's post).

I'm thinking about adding a radius like this 1 inch aluminum tube between the cylinders and wrap the silicone baffle material over the top to help the air flow, it also exposes more area on top of the cylinder. From Rick's post my fins are .5 inch deep so my radius should be larger than .5, perhaps .75.




I'm also thinking of adding a radius at the front of the front cylinders and the rear of the rear cylinders with the tubing cut in half. I'm curious about using automotive heater hose/radiator hose with the right diameter, easier to source and shape than the aluminum tubing.
__________________
RV 7 400 hours and counting
19 donation done
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 06-07-2015, 05:47 PM
flyingriki's Avatar
flyingriki flyingriki is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: California
Posts: 697
Default

Made all my cylinder wraps from metal since they are parallel and easy to curl the ends.
Made all the head wraps with two layers of Bid wetted put with JB Weld for epoxy. Good to 550 degrees, can be trimmed and painted. Used an old cylinder for mold, covered it with packing tape.
If you're interested I can send you some photos.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 06-07-2015, 05:48 PM
BillL BillL is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Central IL
Posts: 5,514
Default

The rounded inlets for the cylinders don't have to be that strong, so I am considering using 1100 from the rack at the hardware store. It rolls around a 5/8" dwell just fine. Maybe even 1/2" with spring back.
__________________
Bill

RV-7
Lord Kelvin:
“I often say that when you can measure what you are speaking about,
and express it in numbers, you know something about it; but when you
cannot measure it, when you cannot express it in numbers, your knowledge
is of a meager and unsatisfactory kind.”
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:56 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.