VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > RV Firewall Forward Section > Traditional Aircraft Engines
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-05-2015, 06:08 PM
hohocc hohocc is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Posts: 187
Default Old baffle kit vs new

I've been offered a baffle kit from 2003 which presumably is what I have seen referred to as the old baffle kit.
Would anybody who has used the older kit care to comment on whether the new is a bit less work, or a lot less work, or in a totally different league from the old? I'm not opposed to using the older kit but would welcome opinions.
Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-05-2015, 07:54 PM
Ironflight's Avatar
Ironflight Ironflight is offline
VAF Moderator / Line Boy
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dayton, NV
Posts: 12,243
Default

Many people have built from the old baffle kit - no doubt about it (and I am one of them. I have also built or been part of building several of the new ones. Totally different league in terms of ease of building IMHO.

We needed a baffle kit for another (non-RV) project - we bought a kit from Van's because it fits the motor so well - we'll just trim it to fit the cowl (the same way you do for the RV's).

Paul
__________________
Paul F. Dye
Editor at Large - KITPLANES Magazine
RV-8 - N188PD - "Valkyrie"
RV-6 (By Marriage) - N164MS - "Mikey"
RV-3B - N13PL - "Tsamsiyu"
A&P, EAA Tech Counselor/Flight Advisor
Dayton Valley Airpark (A34)
http://Ironflight.com
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-06-2015, 04:17 AM
hohocc hohocc is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Posts: 187
Default

Thanks Paul, that's exactly the sort of info I needed.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-06-2015, 08:35 PM
rightrudder rightrudder is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Laguna Hills, CA
Posts: 1,805
Default

Are you mounting the oil cooler on the baffles in the standard location? I believe the newer kits have a tougher aluminum alloy for this section that may help to reduce/prevent cracking.
__________________
Doug
RV-9A "slider"
Flew to Osh in 2017, 2018 & 2019!
Tail number N427DK
Donation made for 2020
You haven't seen a tree until you've seen its shadow from the sky -- Amelia Earhart
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-07-2015, 10:30 AM
BillL BillL is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Central IL
Posts: 5,514
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rightrudder View Post
Are you mounting the oil cooler on the baffles in the standard location? I believe the newer kits have a tougher aluminum alloy for this section that may help to reduce/prevent cracking.
This might be so - three things I found from research are 1. Angle on the vertical corner at the LR of the baffles, 2. Strong link on the left side from the vertical angle over the the top rocker cover screw, and 3. a brace from the inboard flange of the cooler either to the back of that same rocker screw, or over to the case.

OP - If/when you get that kit, let me know and I will send the metal thicknesses from the "new" kit for that cooler corner.
__________________
Bill

RV-7
Lord Kelvin:
“I often say that when you can measure what you are speaking about,
and express it in numbers, you know something about it; but when you
cannot measure it, when you cannot express it in numbers, your knowledge
is of a meager and unsatisfactory kind.”
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-07-2015, 10:43 AM
grayforge's Avatar
grayforge grayforge is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 886
Default

When was the crossover from old to new version?

Thanks,
Russ
__________________
Speed Is Life

VAF Donation made: 1/28/2020, My RV-7A Build Log
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-07-2015, 02:55 PM
hohocc hohocc is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Posts: 187
Default

Thanks for the info folks.
I'm not yet decided on the oil cooler location, but have read plenty on the rear baffle cracks when no reinforcement is used, so that's a good point on the material thickness and type.
If I do end up buying this kit I'll report back on that area.

Last edited by hohocc : 06-07-2015 at 02:56 PM. Reason: Added a few words.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-07-2015, 06:31 PM
N941WR's Avatar
N941WR N941WR is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: SC
Posts: 12,887
Default

I've done both baffle kits and didn't find the older set that confusing. I had to modify the old set to fit on an O-290, which is different than an O-320 or -360.

The new baffle kit I installed went on an O-360 and since I had done the older kit, it was pretty straightforward. The new style kit has better instructions and CAD drawings rather than some copies of a copy of a copy of some old hand drawings. If you can read a drawing, which by the time to you get to this point you can, you won't have a problem with the older baffle kit.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BillL View Post
This might be so - three things I found from research are 1. Angle on the vertical corner at the LR of the baffles, 2. Strong link on the left side from the vertical angle over the the top rocker cover screw, and 3. a brace from the inboard flange of the cooler either to the back of that same rocker screw, or over to the case.

OP - If/when you get that kit, let me know and I will send the metal thicknesses from the "new" kit for that cooler corner.
I would disagree with some of these.

1. Yes, on the angel on the vertical corner by the #4 cylinder.

2. Yes, on a brace from the right side of the oil cooler to a stiffener on the side baffle of the #4 cylinder. (Disregard the nyloc fastener, that was changed before the first engine run.)

3. NO on any brace that spans more than one cylinder or goes from a cylinder baffle to the engine case. The cylinders are not part of the case and move around a good bit so anything that ties one cylinder to another or from one cylinder to the engine case has a good chance of experiencing cracking issues. (Note, fiberglass plenums give enough that they do not experience this problem but I have seen aluminum plenums with cracks.)

If you go with #1, which I like much better than the other options, you will have to file down the corner of the angle aluminum so it nestles in the corner of baffles. Not a big deal but something you will have to do.
__________________
Bill R.
RV-9 (Yes, it's a dragon tail)
O-360 w/ dual P-mags
Build the plane you want, not the plane others want you to build!
SC86 - Easley, SC
www.repucci.com/bill/baf.html

Last edited by N941WR : 06-07-2015 at 06:38 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-07-2015, 08:47 PM
BillL BillL is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Central IL
Posts: 5,514
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by N941WR View Post
I've done both baffle kits and didn't find the older set that confusing. I had to modify the old set to fit on an O-290, which is different than an O-320 or -360.

The new baffle kit I installed went on an O-360 and since I had done the older kit, it was pretty straightforward. The new style kit has better instructions and CAD drawings rather than some copies of a copy of a copy of some old hand drawings. If you can read a drawing, which by the time to you get to this point you can, you won't have a problem with the older baffle kit.


I would disagree with some of these.

1. Yes, on the angel on the vertical corner by the #4 cylinder.

2. Yes, on a brace from the right side of the oil cooler to a stiffener on the side baffle of the #4 cylinder. (Disregard the nyloc fastener, that was changed before the first engine run.)

3. NO on any brace that spans more than one cylinder or goes from a cylinder baffle to the engine case. The cylinders are not part of the case and move around a good bit so anything that ties one cylinder to another or from one cylinder to the engine case has a good chance of experiencing cracking issues. (Note, fiberglass plenums give enough that they do not experience this problem but I have seen aluminum plenums with cracks.)

If you go with #1, which I like much better than the other options, you will have to file down the corner of the angle aluminum so it nestles in the corner of baffles. Not a big deal but something you will have to do.
I think we are on the same page, Bill. I tied the brace to the center of the cooler to prevent twisting. It seem others have had success with a brace back to the case too. I like the short connection.


__________________
Bill

RV-7
Lord Kelvin:
“I often say that when you can measure what you are speaking about,
and express it in numbers, you know something about it; but when you
cannot measure it, when you cannot express it in numbers, your knowledge
is of a meager and unsatisfactory kind.”
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-07-2015, 09:17 PM
Ironflight's Avatar
Ironflight Ironflight is offline
VAF Moderator / Line Boy
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dayton, NV
Posts: 12,243
Default

I've got 1800 hours on the Val's baffles, and my brace goes to a boss on the case Bill. The inboard side of the oil cooler is about half-way out the cylinder, so it is kind of a coin flip which way it should go - remember that the baffle just inboard of that point is tied to the case.

In any case, I believe that brace does a lot to enhance baffle life!
__________________
Paul F. Dye
Editor at Large - KITPLANES Magazine
RV-8 - N188PD - "Valkyrie"
RV-6 (By Marriage) - N164MS - "Mikey"
RV-3B - N13PL - "Tsamsiyu"
A&P, EAA Tech Counselor/Flight Advisor
Dayton Valley Airpark (A34)
http://Ironflight.com
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:41 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.