VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics

  #1  
Old 04-20-2015, 01:11 AM
Ghost two-six's Avatar
Ghost two-six Ghost two-six is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Sunny Florida
Posts: 26
Default Quick Build Question

I'm considering an RV-7 but can only afford one Quick Build item. Which would you recommend - the wings or the fuselage ?
Thanks,
Randy
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-20-2015, 06:53 AM
Mel's Avatar
Mel Mel is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dallas area
Posts: 10,761
Default

If time is your factor, I would recommend the fuselage QB over the wing QB.
The wing is very simple and has nothing in it that you haven't already done on the tail.
The fuselage is quite complex compared to the wing.
__________________
Mel Asberry, DAR since the last century.
EAA Flight Advisor/Tech Counselor, Friend of the RV-1
Recipient of Tony Bingelis Award and Wright Brothers Master Pilot Award
USAF Vet, High School E-LSA Project Mentor.
RV-6 Flying since 1993 (sold)
<rvmel(at)icloud.com>
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-20-2015, 08:25 AM
Arie's Avatar
Arie Arie is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Dubai
Posts: 134
Default

Welcome to VAF Randy!! Basically what Mel said, but the fuselage is more fun to build compared to the wings which is quite boring and repetitive, and not to mention the missing out on pro- sealing the fuel tanks.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-20-2015, 09:35 AM
dweyant dweyant is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: 07TS
Posts: 472
Default

Or, for a different option...

I went slow build on my 9A. I saved about $11k over the cost of the quick build.

I used some (most) of the money I would have spent on the QB to hire someone to help me with the canopy and the FWF.

For me at least I felt that was a MUCH better use of my money. I've seen people spend a year on the canopy and it still not be quite right. Having someone that had done one before help me was huge.

On the FWF plumbing. I could have done it by myself, but having someone with some expertise double check everything and make sure it was done correctly was a huge time saver.

Just another option to think of.

-Dan
__________________
Dan Weyant
RV-9A N96KD
Done and Flying 4/30/2015
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-20-2015, 09:47 AM
bruceh's Avatar
bruceh bruceh is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Ramona, CA
Posts: 2,367
Default

I did the slow build and it took me 6 months to get the tail and wings done. Getting the fuselage to the quickbuild stage took me about a year and a half.
And I was putting in plenty of hours every week! So to answer your question, the biggest time saving is definitely getting the quickbuild fuselage.

As others have mentioned here in the forums, some of the quickbuild fuel tanks have been problematic with leaks and paint bubbling. I'm glad I was able to be super meticulous when I built the fuel tanks and so far have not had any issues (don't skimp on the proseal). You can also upgrade the fuel caps and senders by doing the slow build.

The canopy was definitely the hardest part of the build, just because of the ever changing nature of the parts and having to trim everything repeatedly to get a good enough fit. The fiberglassing part isn't bad, but it is very iterative - apply, sand, fill, repeat. Once the canopy is done, it is all downhill and tailwinds to the end.
__________________
Bruce Hill
RV-9A N5771H flown over 800 hours!
http://www.overthehills.com/RV-9A-Project
APRS Tracking for KJ6YRP and New Flying Blog
2020 VAF donator
EAA Tech Counselor, Build assistance - canopy/tanks/fiberglass/electrical/repairs
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-20-2015, 12:42 PM
Ghost two-six's Avatar
Ghost two-six Ghost two-six is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Sunny Florida
Posts: 26
Default

Thanks for the education guys, I'm sure I'll think of some more questions.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-20-2015, 12:50 PM
Mike S's Avatar
Mike S Mike S is online now
Senior Curmudgeon
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Dayton Airpark, NV A34
Posts: 15,408
Default Welcome to VAF!

Randy, aboard the good ship VAF.
__________________
Mike Starkey
VAF 909

Rv-10, N210LM.

Flying as of 12/4/2010

Phase 1 done, 2/4/2011

Sold after 240+ wonderful hours of flight.

"Flying the airplane is more important than radioing your plight to a person on the ground incapable of understanding or doing anything about it."
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-21-2015, 07:08 AM
Ghost two-six's Avatar
Ghost two-six Ghost two-six is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Sunny Florida
Posts: 26
Default thanks

Thanks Mike
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:34 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.