To follow-up on Mark Truemper remarkable experimental work I mentioned earlier in this thread (
http://pointsforpilots.blogspot.com/...2-voltage.html) I finally got to investigate the efficiency of the cooling of the Voltage Regulator by the blast tube.
I fabricated a home made manometer with 1/4" clear vinyl tubing. I shaped the tube in a U with about 2" of water at the bottom and fastened it on a board. One end of the tube is free, the other end is shaped like a pitot with the help of a thick wire. I located the board inside the cockpit in front of the passenger seat and ran two tests with the upper cowl off and the canopy crack open to allow the tube to go into the engine compartment without being crushed.
For the first test I squeezed the pitot between the radiator and the lower cowl duct and then rotated the head to have it facing the air flow to measure the dynamic pressure. I ran the engine between 2000 and 2500 rpm which is the rate we use to start the engine cold and to taxi around the airport.
For the second test I cut a slit into the blast tube, inserted the pitot to face the air stream and sealed the tube around the pitot with electric tape.
Results:
Air pressure in the lower cowl duct: 3/16" (5mm) of water
Air pressure in the blast tube: zero.
I did not try higher rpm rates because the issue, as explained in Klaus Truemper study is cooling of the regulator on ground during taxiing. When flying, the ram air provides plenty of pressure to provide a good flow of air in the blast tube. Klaus relocated his blast tube in the stream of the propeller and he solved his problem of multiple voltage regulator failures.
In the case of the RV-12, the inlet of the duct on which the blast tube is connected is close to the root of the propeller while the opening of the lower cowl duct is facing the middle of the blades.
Conclusion: As some elements of the RV-12 depend on the workmanship, it is difficult to generalize. For example different builders may have adjusted the cooling shroud in a way that creates more resistance to the air cooling the cylinders which may result in a higher static pressure upstream, where the blast tube is connected. More tests like this one would be needed to find out if this absence of airflow in my blast tube in the 2,000 to 2,500 rpm range is common. If it is, it is likely that overheating of the Voltage Regulator is occurring when operating in warm weather with an engine already hot (for example on a refueling stop) and taxiing a long time on the ground. One may imagine that VANs red RV-12 that is used for transition training and demos may have been stressed this way.
What to do?
I think that VANs decision to relocate the regulator inside the cockpit has a good chance to solve the problem. If you (as I) don't like the new location, we have several options:
- Remove the blast tube and let the air flow inside the engine compartment take care of the cooling. There is plenty of air blowing from the radiator at 2,000 rpms, even if it is not cold air it's better than no air at all under an aluminum helmet.
- Relocate the blast tube's inlet into the radiators cooling duct and have the tube inlet facing the air flow (will require a way to disconnect the tube when removing the lower cowl)
- Switch to the JD regulator as shown in previous posts on this thread
- Switch to
Silent Hektik regulator as discussed in this thread