|
-
POSTING RULES

-
Donate yearly (please).
-
Advertise in here!
-
Today's Posts
|
Insert Pics
|

01-11-2015, 06:59 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: STATEN ISLAND, NY
Posts: 44
|
|
What next?
Ready for the next step, what makes more sense, engine or avionics next?
|

01-11-2015, 07:33 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Coeur d'Alene, ID/Casa Grande, AZ
Posts: 654
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JOEPILOT
Ready for the next step, what makes more sense, engine or avionics next?
|
Work it forward.......
__________________
Ric Dickison
307 (CAB) Phantom
Search and Destroy (Can Tho RVN)
Distinguished Flying Cross Society Member
CH-47 & UH-1H "Driver"
Rotax 9 Series Service IRMT
RV-12 Kit#729 "N312RD" is now a full functioning fun machine!! Thanks Van for fulfilling my dream😎
2018 Dues Paid
|

01-11-2015, 08:03 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Riley TWP MI
Posts: 3,070
|
|
Engine next. Avionics last. The engine will take more time to install and while doing that, the avionics will change and be improved upon before you purchase them.
__________________
Joe Gores
RV-12 Flying
|

01-11-2015, 10:40 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Anacortes, WA
Posts: 823
|
|
Avionic first then engine last
Was wrestling with same question this year. An RV builder who is flying said, "The engine doesn't want to sit around while you finish the airplane. Avionics will be out of date shortly after you buy them anyway. Buy your engine last when you're within a year of flying relative to other parts."
__________________
Steve Lynn
RV-7A
Flying Phase I
Anacortes, WA
www.mykitlog.com/sglynn
|

01-12-2015, 01:50 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 1,647
|
|
Go with the engine first, then avionics.
__________________
rgmwa
RV-12LR 912ULS
120346
|

01-12-2015, 08:05 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 863
|
|
When it comes to building sequence, Vans knows best: follow the instructions. Some builders have deviate with success but keep in mind that the VANs recommended sequence has been tested by many more builders than the variations so in case of problems you will get more help being main stream.
Updates of avionics will never be as disruptive as the switch from D100 to Skyview which Vans handled pretty well nevertheless (I know, I was there). When working on the Avionics shelf, the access from the firewall is easier without the engine.
|

01-12-2015, 09:44 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 461
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JOEPILOT
Ready for the next step, what makes more sense, engine or avionics next?
|
Installing the avionics (if it works and you are not chasing bugs) should take you about a week (next to regular daytime work), so it really is the subkit with the least amount of work. The engine installation is fairly quick too, if it wasn't for the cowling work.
I don't think it matters much which one you pick next but if you want to spread out these sticker-shock items more evenly then I'd suggest to get the engine first as it will take you about 2 months (if you are a working man) to get it all installed before you really need another subkit.
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:53 AM.
|