VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > RV General Discussion/News
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-13-2014, 11:46 PM
Ignition Ignition is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: South Coast, Australia
Posts: 22
Exclamation RV-6A Accident - Melbourne Australia - 14 Oct 2014

Approx 3 hours ago, an RV-6A crashed into a building in Melbourne's South East (Australia). The aircraft had just taken off from nearby Moorabbin Airport and was cruising down the coast at approx 3000ft at 1:26pm - unfortunately the pilot is deceased.

It appears on radar that in approx 5-6 seconds, the aircraft had lost 500ft, and a further 15 seconds later, impacted the ground. A loss of 3000 feet in 20 seconds - around 6-9000 fpm descent rate and increasing.

The ATSB are sending investigators to the scene to determine the cause - ATSB file can be found here: http://www.atsb.gov.au/publications/...-2014-164.aspx
__________________
Cameron
RV-3B (Building... slowly... very slowly )
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-02-2014, 06:32 PM
KRviator's Avatar
KRviator KRviator is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Sydney, Aust.
Posts: 820
Default

The ATSB Update (Part 1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by The ATSB
History of the flight

On 14 October 2014, at 1321 Eastern Daylight-saving time,[1] the pilot of an amateur‑built Van?s RV-6A aircraft, registered VH-JON and being operated in the ?Experimental Category?, reported taxiing for a local flight at Moorabbin Airport, Victoria. The aircraft was subsequently cleared by air traffic control for take-off from runway 17 Right at 1323 and to maintain runway heading to depart the control zone to the south. The aircraft was then observed on Airservices Australia surveillance radar climbing to 2,900 ft above mean sea level (AMSL) and tracking southbound via the coast, in accordance with the published departure procedures for Moorabbin Airport. After 1326:07 no further radar returns were received from the aircraft.

The aircraft was observed by witnesses descending rapidly before impacting the ground next to a house in the suburb of Chelsea, 8 km to the south of Moorabbin. The aircraft was destroyed by the impact and the pilot was fatally injured.

There were a number of small post-impact fires started by the accident that were subsequently extinguished by members of the public and the fire brigade. A number of houses and several cars also sustained significant damage as a result of the accident.

Pilot information

The pilot held commercial and private flight crew licences with an aeroplane category rating. The licences were endorsed with single- and multi-engine class ratings and design feature endorsements for manual propeller-pitch-control and retractable undercarriage. The licences were also endorsed with instrument flight with 3-dimensional and 2-dimensional instrument approach privileges and night visual flight operational ratings. Both ratings were restricted to single-engine aircraft.

The pilot held a current class 2 medical certificate, which meant that the pilot could only exercise the privileges of a private pilot licence. The certificate included restrictions that distance vision correction was to be worn by the pilot and reading vision correction was to be available while exercising the privileges of the licence. The pilot last underwent an aviation medical examination 12 days prior to the accident. During that examination the pilot reported a total of 1,659 flying hours, with 17 hours flown in the last 6 months.

It was reported that the pilot appeared to be well rested in the 72 hours prior to the accident. No medical or other issues were reported to family members by the pilot in that period.

Aircraft information

Civil Aviation Safety Authority records indicated that the aircraft was constructed in 1999. It was first registered as an amateur-built aircraft in 2003 by the pilot, who was also the registered owner and operator.

A search of the Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) occurrence database revealed that the aircraft was involved in two previous accidents. In 2007, the aircraft sustained an engine failure and damage during the resultant forced landing. The Honda V6 engine that was installed at the time was reportedly removed and a new Lycoming IO‑360 aircraft engine installed in its place. It was also reported that the damage was repaired and the aircraft returned to flying status.

The aircraft was again damaged during a landing accident in 2010 when the nose wheel collapsed and the propeller contacted the ground while the engine was running. The engine was reportedly replaced with another Lycoming IO‑360 engine, the damage repaired and the aircraft returned to flying status.

The aircraft was also reported to have been involved in an incident approximately 1 month prior to this October 2014 accident, when an engine fire occurred whilst the aircraft was taxiing at Moorabbin. The fire was extinguished with the assistance of other persons. It was reported that the engine and associated areas of the aircraft were inspected by the pilot, who reported to friends that there appeared to be no damage as a result of the fire.

Aircraft refuelling

None of the mobile refuelling agencies at Moorabbin reported supplying fuel to the aircraft on the day of the accident.

The Dynon EMS-D120 engine monitoring system fitted to the aircraft recorded data relating to the total amount of fuel on board (see the section titled Onboard recording devices). The last system-recorded date of an increase in the amount of fuel on board coincided with the last recorded date that the pilot purchased fuel (AVGAS 100 low-lead) from a self‑service bowser at Moorabbin.

The EMS-D120 data showed that the aircraft completed three separate flights over a period of about a month after that refuelling, totalling 2.1 hours. This did not include the accident flight.

Weather information

The weather conditions at the time were reported to include a moderate to strong southerly wind at 17 kt, with some mid-level cloud in the area. Visibility was reported to be greater than 10 km. These conditions were consistent with the forecasts for Moorabbin and the greater Melbourne area.

Communications

Examination of the recorded air traffic control radio transmissions for Moorabbin Tower and the associated flight information service frequency to the south of Moorabbin revealed no emergency broadcast from the pilot. There was no evidence of any partial transmissions, open‑microphone transmissions[2] or over-transmissions[3] during the flight.

Aircraft wreckage information

Wreckage examination


The aircraft impacted a house fence and adjoining laneway in a significant nose-down attitude at high speed. The initial impact was to the left wing, which indicated a left wing‑down attitude of about 10? at the time. Witness marks on the fence indicated a descent angle of about 35?.

The aircraft commenced breaking up after the initial impact, with the left wing remaining at the initial impact point and the remainder of the aircraft continuing along the laneway. The propeller and engine separated from the fuselage and came to rest approximately 48 m and 68 m respectively from the point of impact.

The vertical and horizontal tail surfaces also separated from the fuselage and from each other and were located along the wreckage trail. The right wing and remainder of the fuselage came to rest approximately 95 m from the impact point but remained largely intact.

The remainder of the aircraft, including the cockpit, was destroyed during the impact sequence. Items associated with the aircraft were located in the laneway up to 130 m from the point of impact.

All flight controls and major aircraft components, including the cockpit canopy, were identified at the accident site.

Examination of the fuselage revealed considerable oil coating on the external surfaces. Oil was also found on the upper surface of the right wing and right horizontal stabiliser (Figure 1). There was very little oil coating on the left horizontal stabiliser and none on the left wing. Examination of recovered fragments of the cockpit canopy also showed oil coating on their internal and external surfaces.

Figure 1: Horizontal stabilisers displaying right stabiliser oil coating

Source: ATSB

The engine and propeller were recovered for later technical examination under the supervision of the ATSB.
__________________
Once you have tasted flight you will forever walk the earth with your eyes turned skywards, for there you have been and there you will long to return - Leonardo DaVinci

My Flickr gallery: http://www.flickr.com/photos/35521362@N06/

RV-9A - Finished on 10th February 2016 after 4 years, 9 months and 19 days! The 1020th RV-9 flying.

First flight 26th March 2016. Essential specs 145KTAS @ 2400RPM, 8000', 24.2LPH, Initial RoC 1800FPM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-02-2014, 06:33 PM
KRviator's Avatar
KRviator KRviator is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Sydney, Aust.
Posts: 820
Default

The update - Part 2.

Quote:
Originally Posted by The ATSB
Recovered items

A number of aviation-related items were reported recovered at distances of up to 3 km from the accident site by members of the public and handed in to Victoria Police (Figure 2). These items included the pilot?s flight crew licence and aviation medical certificate, an aircraft pitot cover and warning flag, a flight bag, an En Route Supplement Australia (ERSA)[4] and a very high frequency (VHF) handheld transceiver and antenna.

Figure 2: Location of recovered aviation-related items relative to the accident site

Source: ATSB

Recorded information

Onboard recording devices


A number of electronic devices were recovered from the aircraft wreckage with the capability to record in-flight data. These included two Garmin global positioning system (GPS) units, a Dynon EFIS-D100 electronic flight information system and a Dynon EMS‑D120 engine monitoring system.

GPS units

Initial examination of the GPS units revealed significant damage. Further detailed examination is required to establish if any data can be recovered from either GPS.

EFIS-D100

Examination of the EFIS-D100 unit revealed that it was not configured for data logging. No relevant data was recovered from this unit.

EMS-D120

The EMS-D120 unit logged data from the accident flight. This included the aircraft?s GPS ground track and derived ground speed (Figure 3). When compared to the recorded radar data, the GPS ground track was consistent with the aircraft?s recorded radar track. No altitude or airspeed information was logged by the unit.

A number of engine operating parameters were also recorded by the EMS-D120.These parameters revealed that the engine appeared to be performing normally during the take‑off, climb to altitude and short cruise period. Work is ongoing to explain a decrease in the engine oil pressure about 7 seconds before the end of the recorded data.

The last valid data logged was time stamped at 1326:00.[5] The corresponding GPS position showed the aircraft approximately 640 m to the north of the accident site at that time.

Figure 3: Recovered data from the EMS-D120

Source: ATSB

Closed-circuit television footage

Closed-circuit television (CCTV) footage of the aircraft as it taxied at Moorabbin that day revealed no apparent anomalies with the aircraft. The aircraft?s cockpit canopy was in the lowered position at that time.

Other CCTV security cameras at Chelsea captured the last seconds of the flight. Analysis of that footage confirmed a steep nose-down flight path and an aircraft speed of approximately 200 kt (370 km/hr) leading up to the impact with terrain.

Radar data

Examination of the recorded radar data showed the aircraft climbing out of Moorabbin on runway heading at 1323:53. Twenty-eight valid radar returns were recorded for the aircraft, which was transmitting radar transponder code 3000.[6] The last valid return was at 1326:07 and indicated an altitude of 2,500 ft. Other traffic in the vicinity was detected by radar at altitudes as low as 1,100 ft.

Further investigation

The investigation is continuing and will include examination of the:
?engine and propeller
?cockpit canopy locking mechanisms in a number of similar aircraft
?construction, maintenance and repair history of the aircraft
?viability of recovering additional data from the accident‑damaged GPS units
?radar data from a number of additional radar heads to determine if any further returns were recorded from the aircraft
?pilot?s medical and flying history.
__________________
Once you have tasted flight you will forever walk the earth with your eyes turned skywards, for there you have been and there you will long to return - Leonardo DaVinci

My Flickr gallery: http://www.flickr.com/photos/35521362@N06/

RV-9A - Finished on 10th February 2016 after 4 years, 9 months and 19 days! The 1020th RV-9 flying.

First flight 26th March 2016. Essential specs 145KTAS @ 2400RPM, 8000', 24.2LPH, Initial RoC 1800FPM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-02-2014, 07:05 PM
Infidel's Avatar
Infidel Infidel is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: WV22
Posts: 849
Default

Very sad to read and seems to me, that -6 had some bad mojo. Not that I'm superstitious but, sometimes we have to wonder.
__________________
RV-4 0320\D3G 160, Whirlwind 200GA 70".
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-03-2014, 09:28 AM
ijustwannafly's Avatar
ijustwannafly ijustwannafly is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Colorado
Posts: 243
Default

Very sad indeed and unfortunately we may never know what really happened
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-04-2014, 11:41 PM
aarvig's Avatar
aarvig aarvig is offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: KANE, Hugo, Minnesota
Posts: 765
Default

Wow, both the Canadian and Australian accident reporting authorities put out very through reports. Especially relative to the NTSB. I wonder why that is?
My thoughts and prayers to all involved in this crash.
__________________
Aaron Arvig
RV-9A
Empennage Done
Wings-In Progress
N568AK Reserved
SOLD?but I'll be back
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-05-2014, 12:21 AM
E. D. Eliot E. D. Eliot is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: San Pedro
Posts: 1,013
Default Guess that I missed it!

There was a fatal accident of an RV-12 in Australia on its first flight about a year ago. Guess that I missed the definitive report on the 'why' of this accident. Since I will build a 12, I'm very interested to hear the final Australian report if it is out.

Please advise - my info on this accident is about 6 months old.
__________________
Building finally
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-05-2014, 01:50 AM
Richard Connell Richard Connell is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 220
Thumbs down Here you go.

http://atsb.gov.au/media/4469487/AE-2013-069_Final.pdf
__________________
Richard
RV7 VH-XRC Sold :-(
RV10 in progress.
Sydney, AUS
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-05-2014, 03:19 AM
PIN 37 PIN 37 is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Adelaide Australia
Posts: 218
Default

Not actually sure I know what that says, can anyone dissect that and tell me what happened. Here in Oz we have heard rumours, .... but lets talk about it.

PS. I have made a changes to the trim on my RV7 based on the "rumours" about what caused the RV12 crash
__________________
Phil
LAME (Aust)
RV7 99% finished

Last edited by PIN 37 : 12-05-2014 at 03:25 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-05-2014, 04:14 AM
RV10inOz's Avatar
RV10inOz RV10inOz is offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Brisbane Qld. Aust.
Posts: 2,271
Default

The RV12 was nothing but showboating/ cowboying and predictable

Don't worry about yours though.
__________________
______________________________

David Brown

DYNON Authorised Dealer and Installer


The two best investments you can make, by any financial test, an EMS and APS!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:03 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.