VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Model Specific > RV-7/7A
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-20-2014, 05:38 PM
Ottertrack Ottertrack is offline
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Grand Marais
Posts: 33
Default Hartzell CS Prop comparison

I am ready to "pull the trigger" on my engine/propeller combo purchase from Vans. I plan to order the (I)O-360-M1B engine with a Hartzell constant speed prop. I am building a 7A and according to Vans I could install the C2YR-72 inch or the 74 inch. They are both the same price of $7300.00. Does anyone know which one would be the best choice, or is the difference negligible?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-20-2014, 06:09 PM
BillL BillL is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Central IL
Posts: 5,516
Default

Well, I have the composite 72" because that was the only length recommendation for the taildragger. I asked this question of a Hartzell guy once and he said, use the 74" if you can because the minimum permissible length for that blade is 72" So if damage occurs, you have some margin.

You should verify this yourself with Hartzell and the brain trust here. Good luck, that is a very efficient blade!
__________________
Bill

RV-7
Lord Kelvin:
“I often say that when you can measure what you are speaking about,
and express it in numbers, you know something about it; but when you
cannot measure it, when you cannot express it in numbers, your knowledge
is of a meager and unsatisfactory kind.”
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-20-2014, 06:43 PM
DanBaier's Avatar
DanBaier DanBaier is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Rochester NY
Posts: 669
Default

Running a 7A with the 74 blended airfoil prop. Works very well.

Dan
__________________
RV7A (N7101) - Flying 10/2008
CFI- SE/ME/Inst
A&P
KC2ZEL
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-20-2014, 07:11 PM
Ottertrack Ottertrack is offline
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Grand Marais
Posts: 33
Default Hartzell prop

Thanks guys. I'm planning on selling the mags that come with the engine on Craig's List or eBay. I asked Van's if I could order the engine minus the mags and they said no. I am planning on using the Lightspeed Plasma III ignition and I think this combination will be really good. Tomorrow I will call Hartzell and ask them about the 72" vs 74". I appreciate your input!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-20-2014, 07:12 PM
Neal@F14's Avatar
Neal@F14 Neal@F14 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Wichita Falls, TX
Posts: 2,182
Default

The 74" prop can be trimmed down to 72" if at some point in the future a prop overhaul needs that much metal removed to clean up the blades. Yes it does reduce prop clearance by 1 inch but if you're nosed over that far in a bad landing you're already in more trouble than an extra inch of clearance is likely to help. My opinion only. My Sensenich GA prop is 72" and I have an abundance of clearance on a RV-6.
__________________
Neal Howard
Airplaneless once again...

Last edited by Neal@F14 : 08-23-2014 at 10:30 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-20-2014, 07:21 PM
Neal@F14's Avatar
Neal@F14 Neal@F14 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Wichita Falls, TX
Posts: 2,182
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ottertrack View Post
Thanks guys. I'm planning on selling the mags that come with the engine on Craig's List or eBay.
Advertise them here on the VAF classifieds too... there's always somebody somewhere looking for mags.
__________________
Neal Howard
Airplaneless once again...
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-20-2014, 08:32 PM
petersb petersb is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 328
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ottertrack View Post
I am ready to "pull the trigger" on my engine/propeller combo purchase from Vans. I plan to order the (I)O-360-M1B engine with a Hartzell constant speed prop. I am building a 7A and according to Vans I could install the C2YR-72 inch or the 74 inch. They are both the same price of $7300.00. Does anyone know which one would be the best choice, or is the difference negligible?
I went through the same dilemma. The argument is that the 72" is slightly faster while the 74" improves climb. I think either difference is marginal.

I went with the 72" for the additional ground clearance in my 7A.

Although the 74" gives an additional 1" to trim if the tip is damaged, it was suggested that if the tip was damaged it would normally be more than 1 inch.

No way to make a logical decision
__________________
RV7A New Dec 2013 - 360, C/S, slider
RV6 - 1600 Hours ---- Sold

Last edited by petersb : 08-20-2014 at 09:44 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-21-2014, 10:00 AM
Ottertrack Ottertrack is offline
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Grand Marais
Posts: 33
Default Hartzell 74" Prop

I called Hartzell this morning and Alex, one of the techs, said there is not much difference between the 72" & the 74". He did say the 74" should give a slightly better climb capability. He encouraged me to order the 74" as long as I have adequate ground clearance which I do with the 7A. This I will do. As others pointed out on this thread, in case of a nick at the tip, I would have some extra prop to file off. Thanks again for your thoughts. I live in the wilderness of northern Minnesota, 50 miles from the nearest airport and probably a hundred miles at least from the nearest builder, so I find this forum very valuable for advice.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-22-2014, 08:49 PM
Captain Avgas Captain Avgas is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,868
Default Go for clearance

Prop clearance is like money....you just can't have enough of it.

But builders who buy the 74" prop rather than the 72" prop just sort of feel like they're getting something extra for the same price...a bonus of 1" of metal at either tip...something for free....but what they're really getting is the higher likelihood of a prop strike. And possibly lower speed as well.

A prop strike is an insurance claim (if you have hull insurance...which you probably should). So what would you prefer in the event of a prop strike....that the insurance company is forced to replace your 72" prop with a nice new unit or save themselves a few bucks and do a major repair of your mangled 74" prop.

I know what I'd prefer.

Incidentally, anecdotal evidence suggest that the 74" prop will climb a bit better but that the shorter 72" prop will go a bit faster.
__________________
You’re only as good as your last landing
Bob Barrow
RV7A

Last edited by Captain Avgas : 08-22-2014 at 08:55 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-23-2014, 12:53 PM
David Z David Z is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
Posts: 335
Default

If you fly off gravel runways, or even runways that aren't kept clean, then you will be able to dress out a lot of rock damage on a 74" that you won't be able to on a 72".

Although, if you are experienced and use good gravel techniques, shouldn't need to dress the prop much either
__________________
RV-8
Empennage Passed Pre-close Inspection
Wings mostly done
Fuselage is "in the mail"
83126
Dash 8 day job is financing the RV-8
Donation till September 2021
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:09 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.