VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Model Specific > RV-7/7A
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-17-2014, 08:32 AM
wirejock's Avatar
wirejock wirejock is online now
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Estes Park, CO
Posts: 3,930
Default Plans error?

Has anyone noticed this? On DWG 12 the plans show holes to be left open for the bottom skin attachment (first pic). On DWG 38 it's a different set of holes (second pic). The top skin holes match on both drawings but on the bottom skin, they are different. I suspect DWG 38 is correct. Or am I missing something?
Sorry about the orientation of the photos.
Also, if you didn't install the platenuts before the skin, how did you dimple the multiple layers for the platenut rivets? Will a squeezer and dimple dies make an adequate dimple for the screw and rivets?



__________________
Larry Larson
Estes Park, CO
http://wirejockrv7a.blogspot.com
wirejock at yahoo dot com
Donated 12/03/2019, plus a little extra.
RV-7A #73391, N511RV reserved (2,000+ hours)
HS SB, empennage, tanks, wings, fuse, working finishing kit
Disclaimer
I cannot be, nor will I be, held responsible if you try to do the same things I do and it does not work and/or causes you loss, injury, or even death in the process.

Last edited by wirejock : 08-17-2014 at 08:47 AM. Reason: edit
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-17-2014, 09:11 AM
DougJ's Avatar
DougJ DougJ is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Prather, CA
Posts: 191
Default

Sahrens on the board ran into this on a day I went over to help. He also had QB wings with all the holes filled. He had noticed this error on the plans, and that his wings had some extra rivets, and was concerned. After stepping back and looking at it, and looking at my RV-6, he concluded that it's an error but not a big deal.

We drilled the extra rivets out of the wings, decided that the hole pattern wasn't going to match either plan, and moved on.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-17-2014, 09:14 AM
wirejock's Avatar
wirejock wirejock is online now
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Estes Park, CO
Posts: 3,930
Default Search

Thanks Doug. I should have done a search first. There is a wealth of knowledge here.
Moderators, feel free to delete the thread.
__________________
Larry Larson
Estes Park, CO
http://wirejockrv7a.blogspot.com
wirejock at yahoo dot com
Donated 12/03/2019, plus a little extra.
RV-7A #73391, N511RV reserved (2,000+ hours)
HS SB, empennage, tanks, wings, fuse, working finishing kit
Disclaimer
I cannot be, nor will I be, held responsible if you try to do the same things I do and it does not work and/or causes you loss, injury, or even death in the process.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-17-2014, 09:20 AM
aviator68 aviator68 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Germany
Posts: 11
Default

Hi,

why Vans's doesn't change the plans?

Bye
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-17-2014, 10:33 AM
BillL BillL is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Central IL
Posts: 5,514
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aviator68 View Post
Hi,

why Vans's doesn't change the plans?

Bye
Some things just are what they are - this is one. They are a small operation to keep costs down and they use their people to answer the same questions and focus on making new planes.

This is just an observation - not being critical. I am just happy they answer questions pretty well, costs are low, and stay in business for future support.

Hopefully the 14 people realize this behavior and some enterprising person is gathering a list of defects to post/sell to future builders. 14 guys listening?
__________________
Bill

RV-7
Lord Kelvin:
“I often say that when you can measure what you are speaking about,
and express it in numbers, you know something about it; but when you
cannot measure it, when you cannot express it in numbers, your knowledge
is of a meager and unsatisfactory kind.”
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-17-2014, 10:37 AM
SkyFlorida's Avatar
SkyFlorida SkyFlorida is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 74
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wirejock View Post
Thanks Doug. I should have done a search first. There is a wealth of knowledge here.
Moderators, feel free to delete the thread.
Delete the thread? Larry, I'm a bit behind you on the 7 wings and this stuff is really important. I get a few 'gotchas' from a local builder, but I wish there was somewhere we could go to find the occasional misleading plans and directions.
__________________
Michael Albert
RV-7
Fuse.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-17-2014, 10:43 AM
ArVeeNiner's Avatar
ArVeeNiner ArVeeNiner is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,125
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BillL View Post
Some things just are what they are - this is one. They are a small operation to keep costs down and they use their people to answer the same questions and focus on making new planes.

This is just an observation - not being critical. I am just happy they answer questions pretty well, costs are low, and stay in business for future support.

Hopefully the 14 people realize this behavior and some enterprising person is gathering a list of defects to post/sell to future builders. 14 guys listening?
BUT if they just spent the time correcting the plans once and posting the revisions online, wouldn't the number of phone calls reduce allowing them to keep their costs down even lower and focus on making even more new planes?

My lack of trust in the plans after hitting the first gotcha slowed down my build considerably. Before I did anything I searched on VAF for errors and gotchas and I still got "Vandalized". I love my plane and I'm thankful that Vans is around but it sure would have been nice to hang my hat on the plans and directions.
__________________
Kelly Johnson
San Jose, CA
RV-9A

Pink slip issued: 5/7/12

First flight: 5/28/12, Memorial Day.

Phase I Complete: 8/18/12!

2020 donation: complete

Last edited by ArVeeNiner : 08-17-2014 at 10:49 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-17-2014, 11:08 AM
wirejock's Avatar
wirejock wirejock is online now
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Estes Park, CO
Posts: 3,930
Default Gotchas

Quote:
Originally Posted by SkyFlorida View Post
Delete the thread? Larry, I'm a bit behind you on the 7 wings and this stuff is really important. I get a few 'gotchas' from a local builder, but I wish there was somewhere we could go to find the occasional misleading plans and directions.
I'm with you Michael.
This is a little one. I would love a gotcha page.
If I can help, feel free to e-mail.
__________________
Larry Larson
Estes Park, CO
http://wirejockrv7a.blogspot.com
wirejock at yahoo dot com
Donated 12/03/2019, plus a little extra.
RV-7A #73391, N511RV reserved (2,000+ hours)
HS SB, empennage, tanks, wings, fuse, working finishing kit
Disclaimer
I cannot be, nor will I be, held responsible if you try to do the same things I do and it does not work and/or causes you loss, injury, or even death in the process.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-17-2014, 11:12 AM
russ-e russ-e is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: brighton co.
Posts: 35
Default

Hi, Larry
I had not noticed the different rivet spacing in the plan`s. With respect to dimpling 2 layer`s the inboard skins are .032 and you could machine countersink them. Ask Ryan and see what he says.
Russ Emick,Jr.
building RV-8A
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-17-2014, 02:24 PM
az_gila's Avatar
az_gila az_gila is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: 57AZ - NW Tucson area
Posts: 10,011
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by russ-e View Post
Hi, Larry
I had not noticed the different rivet spacing in the plan`s. With respect to dimpling 2 layer`s the inboard skins are .032 and you could machine countersink them. Ask Ryan and see what he says.
Russ Emick,Jr.
building RV-8A
Another option used by the early -6 builders was to use a small 0.032 plate/shim between the rib and the nutplate.

This allows a complete countersink for the #8 screw and lets you use the usual K-1000 nutplate instead of the countersunk K-1100 nutplate version.

Essentially the extra metal layer duplicates the -6 plans call out for the upper nutplates in the area of the wing walk stiffener plate.
__________________
Gil Alexander
EAA Technical Counselor, Airframe Mechanic
Half completed RV-10 QB purchased
RV-6A N61GX - finally flying
Grumman Tiger N12GA - flying
La Cholla Airpark (57AZ) Tucson AZ
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:32 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.