VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics

  #1  
Old 07-27-2014, 01:56 PM
acam37's Avatar
acam37 acam37 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Lufkin Tx
Posts: 689
Default Dynafocal Bushings Misaligned

I've been rebuilding a -4 for nearly a year now. It came time to re-mount the engine using new Lord Mounts with the same part # as the old ones. No matter what we do they will not align properly. I didn't pay much attention to the old mounts when removed but by looking at them it appears they were also mis-aligned. This engine is an older 0-320-E2G. It appears the engine mount might not be the right one for this engine, but not being the original builder I have no idea what was ordered with the kit. Comments or advise would be greatly appreciated.
[IMG][/IMG]
[IMG][/IMG]
[IMG][/IMG]
[IMG][/IMG]
Notice there is a spacer between the engine and bushing. We thought of removing it, but that would place the fuel pump right against the firewall and the engine mount itself would hit the engine, so that is no longer an option.
__________________
Arlie Conner (A&P)
RV-4 (N124TT) Sold
RV-8 (N269CP) Sold
RV-4 (N684ML) completed 3-17-19
KOCH Nacogdoches
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-27-2014, 02:45 PM
az_gila's Avatar
az_gila az_gila is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: 57AZ - NW Tucson area
Posts: 10,011
Exclamation

The spacers shouldn't be there.

Given the angles involved they would make the bushings push outwards from the center of the mount - which is what seems to be happening.
__________________
Gil Alexander
EAA Technical Counselor, Airframe Mechanic
Half completed RV-10 QB purchased
RV-6A N61GX - finally flying
Grumman Tiger N12GA - flying
La Cholla Airpark (57AZ) Tucson AZ
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-27-2014, 02:55 PM
Master Designs's Avatar
Master Designs Master Designs is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: United States
Posts: 263
Default

FYI.....Mine doesn't have the spacers. Relocate the fuel pump?? I wonder if the cowl fits with the spacers installed?
__________________
Robert Kramar
Gilbert, Arizona
  • Vans RV-6A
  • Bell 47 D-1 H-13 Sioux Army/Mash Helicopter - Fully Restored and Flying!
  • Vans RV-4 (being upgraded to new panel, firewall, weldments and long gear legs)
Yearly VAF dues paid to date.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-27-2014, 03:46 PM
Mel's Avatar
Mel Mel is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dallas area
Posts: 10,775
Default

Looks like it could possibly be a Dynafocal 2 mount that somebody "made" work?
The angles are different on that mount.
__________________
Mel Asberry, DAR since the last century.
EAA Flight Advisor/Tech Counselor, Friend of the RV-1
Recipient of Tony Bingelis Award and Wright Brothers Master Pilot Award
USAF Vet, High School E-LSA Project Mentor.
RV-6 Flying since 1993 (sold)
<rvmel(at)icloud.com>

Last edited by Mel : 07-27-2014 at 03:48 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-27-2014, 04:01 PM
acam37's Avatar
acam37 acam37 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Lufkin Tx
Posts: 689
Default Spacers

If you remove the spacers (3/4") as mentioned, then it looks like the fuel pump will hit the firewall. Also there would be interference with the cabin heater bracket. It looks like we may have to do some major surgery to make this work. I need to look at another RV-4 to compare the position of the engine components to see if there is anything that can be done to remove the spacers. I would most definitely have to re-work the cowl, but because it's not yet gone to paint it shouldn't be a problem.
__________________
Arlie Conner (A&P)
RV-4 (N124TT) Sold
RV-8 (N269CP) Sold
RV-4 (N684ML) completed 3-17-19
KOCH Nacogdoches
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-27-2014, 04:10 PM
az_gila's Avatar
az_gila az_gila is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: 57AZ - NW Tucson area
Posts: 10,011
Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mel View Post
Looks like it could possibly be a Dynafocal 2 mount that somebody "made" work?
The angles are different on that mount.
Can you check to see if there is a 12 degree difference from the plane of the engine mount "sockets" and the "ears" on the engine?

__________________
Gil Alexander
EAA Technical Counselor, Airframe Mechanic
Half completed RV-10 QB purchased
RV-6A N61GX - finally flying
Grumman Tiger N12GA - flying
La Cholla Airpark (57AZ) Tucson AZ
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-27-2014, 05:11 PM
DanBaier's Avatar
DanBaier DanBaier is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Rochester NY
Posts: 670
Default

As others have suggested, the first step is to determine whether the engine and the mount are Dyna 1 or 2 and possibly mis-matched.

It will be interesting to see what the problem turns out to be. But, the spacers definitely don't belong. At most, there might be a washer on the engine side of the bottom mounts - but nothing like those spacers.

If they were there before you started, and you remove them (assuming you solve the interference problems you mention), you'll probably also have to deal with some changes to the cowl.

Dan
__________________
RV7A (N7101) - Flying 10/2008
CFI- SE/ME/Inst
A&P
KC2ZEL
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-27-2014, 08:35 PM
southtarnation's Avatar
southtarnation southtarnation is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Punta Gorda, Fl
Posts: 325
Default

The fuel pump over flow fitting is usually what would rub on -4's unless the firewall is pinged/dented in a bit to clear it and/or the installation of the vans fitting they make and sell. This was the case on mine with a conical mount and the same when I switched to the dynafocal mount.The heater box was probably placed where it is when the engine was mounted with those spacers and may have cleared then but when you correct the spacer. Issue you will most likely need to relocate it. It's very tight in there as you know. I used The Lord dampeners too and they call out for a washer (for eventual sag) on the lower to donuts only. No spacers. I'd put money on having miss matched mount to motor as mentioned.

Your -e2g appears to be a Type 1 dynafocal mount from what I read on Wikipedia

Type 1 (30°) dynafocal mount attachment and Type 2 (18°) mount attachment (angle to crank)
__________________
Jesse
'89 RV-4, N2626C - purchased flying
Converted to Fastback - Sliding Canopy - Tall Gear
Dynon Skyview w/ acc. & VP-x Sport
Catto 3-Blade (gen. 1)
Based: KPGD

Last edited by southtarnation : 07-27-2014 at 08:46 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-27-2014, 09:22 PM
lr172 lr172 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Schaumburg, IL
Posts: 5,315
Default

Your last picture shows both of the bushing havles are pushing in an outward condition relatively equally. This would indicate that the bolt angle is on the same plane as the mount and it is consistent with extending the angled fittings away from each other (in this case the spacers). If you were dealing with different angles on the engine and mount, you would expect the two bushings halves to be bulging in opposite directions or one in one direction and the other appearing normal.

Larry
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-27-2014, 10:03 PM
aerhed aerhed is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Big Sandy, WY
Posts: 2,567
Default

Also, if you remove the spacers your spinner will hit your cowl for sure.
__________________
Actual repeat offender.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:41 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.