VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > RV General Discussion/News
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-23-2014, 06:43 AM
Saville's Avatar
Saville Saville is offline
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: KBVY Massachusetts
Posts: 1,100
Default Upgrading Engine in a -4 vs -8 - which is harder?

Hi all,

I'm in the market for a -4 or a -8. There are a lot of variables in my mind and I'm trying to sort them out/eliminate them by getting answers to questions. This particular question is a big one:

There is a "Build or buy?" thread in the -4 forum. The consensus seems to be that if you are going to buy, find a good airframe and then customize it the way you want.


If I buy an a/c with an O-320 FP, and I want to upgrade to an O-360 C/S, the questions are:

1) Is there any difference in the amount of work and/or expense doing this in a -4 vs a -8?

2) In either case, would I need a new engine mount? New cowling? New anything else?

3) Aside from routing the prop control to the cockpit and modifying the throttle quadrant, is this sort of engine upgrade a difficult proposition if you have not built an airplane?

Thanks for any insight.

Last edited by Saville : 07-23-2014 at 08:46 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-23-2014, 08:15 AM
southtarnation's Avatar
southtarnation southtarnation is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Punta Gorda, Fl
Posts: 325
Default

That change on a -4 would require:
New gear legs matched to new motor mount
New cowl and obviously prop and spinner
The governor would need a recess cut into the firewall.
Relocation of the battery and any other tricks to move the c of g back away from the nose.
__________________
Jesse
'89 RV-4, N2626C - purchased flying
Converted to Fastback - Sliding Canopy - Tall Gear
Dynon Skyview w/ acc. & VP-x Sport
Catto 3-Blade (gen. 1)
Based: KPGD
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-23-2014, 08:25 AM
Low Pass's Avatar
Low Pass Low Pass is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,012
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by southtarnation View Post
That change on a -4 would require:
New gear legs matched to new motor mount
New cowl and obviously prop and spinner
The governor would need a recess cut into the firewall.
Relocation of the battery and any other tricks to move the c of g back away from the nose.
You sure the mount would change?? I just changed my -8 from -320 to -360 (parallel, Dynafocal to Dynafocal). Only substantial change was the baffling. I did keep the same CS prop. Just put the cowl back on and go.

The dimensional change was the width of the engine. This would likely be a slightly greater concern with a -4 (stuffing everything into the smaller cowling space).

Whether or not one has built a kit plane isn't really the measure, IMO. Whether or not you're familiar with maintaining/installing/modifying things forward of the firewall in a small plane is. And a swap as you describe puts you back in the complexity of original firewall forward kit construction.

Last edited by Low Pass : 07-23-2014 at 08:27 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-23-2014, 08:52 AM
Saville's Avatar
Saville Saville is offline
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: KBVY Massachusetts
Posts: 1,100
Default

Low Pass,

From what you write, you make it sound as if it's easier in a -8 than a -4.

And yes there is also the question as to what an O 360 really buys you in a -4. According to Van's performance charts, we're talking a little over 7 mph difference.

Thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-23-2014, 09:06 AM
Guy Prevost's Avatar
Guy Prevost Guy Prevost is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: albuquerque, nm
Posts: 1,167
Default

In addition to the comments above:

There is very little room between the engine and the firewall on an RV-4.

There is a lot of room between the engine and the firewall on an RV-8. The 8 doesn't need a recess for the governor--In fact there is probably 6-8" between my governor and the firewall.

Best,
Guy
__________________
Guy Prevost
Albuquerque, NM
RV-8a Built, Enjoyed, Sold
Two Kids: Built, Enjoying
RV-10, Bought, Rebuilt, Enjoying
Build / First Flight Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8f9HXzZT1dE
Build Log: http://websites.expercraft.com/geprevo/

Arguing on the internet is like having a competition to see who can hit a brick wall the hardest. You may win, but you're still an idiot.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-23-2014, 10:00 AM
Mel's Avatar
Mel Mel is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dallas area
Posts: 10,768
Default

The -4 also used a different cowling for F/P vs C/S.
F/P cowlings were designed for a 4" extension. Later the cowlings were changed to use a shorter extension so the same cowling could be used for both.
__________________
Mel Asberry, DAR since the last century.
EAA Flight Advisor/Tech Counselor, Friend of the RV-1
Recipient of Tony Bingelis Award and Wright Brothers Master Pilot Award
USAF Vet, High School E-LSA Project Mentor.
RV-6 Flying since 1993 (sold)
<rvmel(at)icloud.com>
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-23-2014, 10:05 AM
rbibb's Avatar
rbibb rbibb is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Freericksburg, VA
Posts: 624
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mel View Post
The -4 also used a different cowling for F/P vs C/S.
F/P cowlings were designed for a 4" extension. Later the cowlings were changed to use a shorter extension so the same cowling could be used for both.
Not sure when this change was made but I expect the majority of kits for sale out there have the latest cowl that uses the 2.25" extension for the FP prop.

I expect the change would be easier on an -8 given it has more room but there are a ton of -4s fling with an O-360 up front so it ain't rocket science to cam one in there.
__________________
Richard Bibb
RV-4 N144KT
Fredericksburg, VA
KEZF
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-23-2014, 04:25 PM
southtarnation's Avatar
southtarnation southtarnation is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Punta Gorda, Fl
Posts: 325
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Low Pass View Post
You sure the mount would change?? I just changed my -8 from -320 to -360 (parallel, Dynafocal to Dynafocal). Only substantial change was the baffling. I did keep the same CS prop. Just put the cowl back on and go.

The dimensional change was the width of the engine. This would likely be a slightly greater concern with a -4 (stuffing everything into the smaller cowling space).

Whether or not one has built a kit plane isn't really the measure, IMO. Whether or not you're familiar with maintaining/installing/modifying things forward of the firewall in a small plane is. And a swap as you describe puts you back in the complexity of original firewall forward kit construction.
Yes you are right, I'm not thinking clearly. Motor mount and therefor legs could be reused, sorry bout that.
__________________
Jesse
'89 RV-4, N2626C - purchased flying
Converted to Fastback - Sliding Canopy - Tall Gear
Dynon Skyview w/ acc. & VP-x Sport
Catto 3-Blade (gen. 1)
Based: KPGD
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:25 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.