|
-
POSTING RULES

-
Donate yearly (please).
-
Advertise in here!
-
Today's Posts
|
Insert Pics
|

02-28-2012, 09:18 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 78
|
|
Lizard Skin Sound and Thermal insulation
Watching TV last week end I saw this product.
http://www.lizardskin.com/
It looks like a pretty good product. Not toxic, weight? (about 17 lbs. for 30 square feet), easy to apply, can be painted. I have not heard of anyone using this stuff but I am considering it. But like anything else we use in an airplane it needs to be thought through carefully. So what do others think?
Thanks
Brian
|

03-02-2012, 06:26 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: 1T7, Kestrel Airpark , Texas
Posts: 773
|
|
I don't know of anyone who has used that product.
I have sprayed the firewall and interior of my plane with this.
http://silentcoating.com/sr_500.html
Not flying yet so cannot say there. You can definitely tell the difference in the way the skin or firewall vibrates when struck before and after. I had some overspray to remove and I can also say it is **** hard to remove. But it does add weight as any product would, about 6 - 7 lbs.
__________________
Wade Lively
-8, Flying!
N100WL
IO-360A3B6D, WW 200RV
|

07-16-2014, 06:27 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Greenback, TN
Posts: 534
|
|
Update?
Quote:
Originally Posted by RV8RIVETER
I don't know of anyone who has used that product.
I have sprayed the firewall and interior of my plane with this.
http://silentcoating.com/sr_500.html
Not flying yet so cannot say there. You can definitely tell the difference in the way the skin or firewall vibrates when struck before and after. I had some overspray to remove and I can also say it is **** hard to remove. But it does add weight as any product would, about 6 - 7 lbs.
|
Just wondering.... Is the 6-7 lbs for the total cockpit area and do you find it was helpful now that you are flying?
Thank you
__________________
Marvin McGraw, 5TN4
RV-14. #140039 Complete
Flight hours: 500+
2020 Dues Paid
The Dues Paid note is a reminder for me
|

07-16-2014, 07:21 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 08A
Posts: 9,476
|
|
Apply what you want on sidewalls, but there are very few products suitable for the cabin side of a firewall. Both Lizard Skin and SR500 look like genuine Darwin Award materials to me.
__________________
Dan Horton
RV-8 SS
Barrett IO-390
|

07-17-2014, 08:52 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Lake Country, B.C. Canada
Posts: 2,416
|
|
testing needed?
the MSDS makes these sound a lot like an acrylic paint, no doubt a spin-off of the spray-on boxliner industry.
Seems to be relatively 'safe', as in, not combustible when dry....but it's behavior at high temps IS in question.
__________________
Perry Y.
RV-9a - SOLD!....
Lake Country, BC
|

07-17-2014, 09:55 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Tuttle, Oklahoma
Posts: 2,563
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanH
Apply what you want on sidewalls, but there are very few products suitable for the cabin side of a firewall. Both Lizard Skin and SR500 look like genuine Darwin Award materials to me.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by flyboy1963
the MSDS makes these sound a lot like an acrylic paint, no doubt a spin-off of the spray-on boxliner industry.
Seems to be relatively 'safe', as in, not combustible when dry....but it's behavior at high temps IS in question.
|
I don't think combustibility is the real concern when using these type of products inside the cockpit. The real danger is the 'off-gassing' that will occur when the product is heated. What will you be breathing during an emergency when the firewall starts getting hot?
|

07-17-2014, 11:07 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: PORT ARANSAS
Posts: 419
|
|
One honest question for the sound-proofers: Why go to such great lengths to attenuate noise, when a good pair of Lightspeed ANR headsets is proven to be more effective?
It just seems like the risks of corrosion and weight gain cannot be justified.
__________________
Jay Honeck
RV-8A N14EG
Port Aransas, TX
|

07-17-2014, 11:34 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Denver
Posts: 564
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjhoneck
One honest question for the sound-proofers: Why go to such great lengths to attenuate noise, when a good pair of Lightspeed ANR headsets is proven to be more effective?
It just seems like the risks of corrosion and weight gain cannot be justified.
|
Agreed. I went to some effort to sound proof my -10, from firewall to baggage bulkhead. It is noticeably quieter than uninsulated -10s, but still way too noisy to fly without a good ANR headset. In retrospect, it was not worth the time, effort or expense.
Jim Berry
RV-10
|

07-17-2014, 11:53 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: NC
Posts: 112
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjhoneck
One honest question for the sound-proofers: Why go to such great lengths to attenuate noise, when a good pair of Lightspeed ANR headsets is proven to be more effective?
It just seems like the risks of corrosion and weight gain cannot be justified.
|
This is perhaps the best small airplane perspective I've seen to date on this subject. Shave ounces by cutting lightening holes then add soundproofing pounds. Bite the ANR bullet - I remember my first experience with a set in the C-130 coming back from deployment. My third or fourth trip over, so I knew the effects of several days of 8-hour flying and was shocked how much better I felt after each day of flying this trip. Those were David Clark's - now using Bose in the Herk and modding DC's for the -4.
Enjoyed the post JJHoneck.
Patrick
__________________
P.B.
Privileged to explore the world in the venerable Lockheed C-130 and the regions around NC in a work-in-progress RV-4, kit #2614, while paying the bills aboard an Airbus A-330.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:19 PM.
|